Her entire argument is that sentencing should be lighter on internet child porn because it makes it easier to do.
You know, like treating murder lighter if they use a gun because guns are easier to kill something with
imagine defending the child porn team.. the left always is
"I can't fix my life, but I can fix the world" said the socialist
I would call bull****. Unless you know where to look ahead of time you wont find child porn in 15 minutes. The dark web has pretty much anything illegal you want to find
Not sure how active that is anymore. Also torrents are the other source.
There are cases where I think a very light sentence is warranted but those are also cases I dont think should be brought in the first place. Like a minor charged with child porn of himself.
Last edited by cajunrevenge; 03-23-2022 at 11:52 AM.
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.
What an embarrassment that a POS like this is being nominated, and will most likely get seated, to the SC.
Leftism is a mental disease.
Natural Immunity Croc
Justice Clarence Thomas missing 3rd straight day.
What gives?
Is he dying, fishing or on his way to Dubai?
Are you unaware of his hospitalization or are you one of the many piece of **** libs who are rooting for his death?
There is laughable irony that Ms Lindsay is the one that had the exchange.Originally Posted by sturg33
zitothebrave (03-23-2022)
I don’t think downlaoading a file that you don’t distribute and didn’t produce really merits decades in prison. I think the old rules were related to people who had physical collections. To have that many images pre-digital it would probably have taken some serious collecting and to actually know the people distributing it.
I’m not rooting for his death but I’m not going to pretend I don’t think the country would be better off without him on the bench. The longest tenured justice He went on the bench 31 years ago. Democrats have held the presidency for 17 of those years but have appointed one third of the court. I wouldn’t cry about anything that shifted the court our way.
Wow you want the only black person off the court for your political agenda.
Racists gonna racist
rooting for his death ?
from the tone and frequency of his questions from the bench -- believe if in fact I did, I'd be late to the party
still doesnt answer the question, where is he and what is his illness
HRC coughed
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Was he asked to define a "woman" ?
Or testify to his faith ?
But he did tell pubic hair jokes to young staffers.
You were saying about deviants and pedophiles ...
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
stone surprised none of our crack Johnny come lately " epidemiologists" - " or " eastern European historical experts" missed the fact that
the process of even having SCOTUS nomination hearings only began because someone (FDR) had the audacity to nominate a Jew.
You can look it up
He though didn't have to define " woman" to a woman
I used to wonder where sturg got his stupid questions. Now I know
Marsha Blackburn.
You know Rand Paul in a skirt, high heels, 80s hair and backwards
Last edited by 57Brave; 03-24-2022 at 06:43 AM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
VirginiaBrave (03-25-2022)
You (to use a sturg term) clapping seals realize that the reason she's not answering is because she is being asked a question that isn't relevant to what she believes is the law. Right? Like no matter what answer she would give, republicans would be calling for her to be recused from basically any reproductive rights trial, and transgendered trial, etc. By making the lawyer response, she gets to walk away from this and sure the meme trolls of the right like Cheong will have a field day but it's a victory in the court of law even if it's a loss in the court of public opinion for her.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Full on anecdote coming, a long time ago when I was somewhere between 18-20 and doing online dating. I chatted with a girl who said she was 18 she sent me nudes. Skip ahead a bit of the story found out she's 16. Which isn't illegal for sex (didn't do it mind you, just pointing out some other facts here). But if let's say right after she sent them my computer was hacked and those images were released, would I have been charged with distributing child pornography when at that point I didn't think anything was wrong at all. I thought I was talking to someone else who just graduated high school. Let's add a layer. I delete those files anyway because I wasn't attracted to this person in the end. Everything goes on as it was. Those images are released and tracked back to my PC via IP and MAC information. Am I liable? Is she liable for creating child pornography? When she wasn't being exploited she was willingly taking nudes and sending them.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
lol. I think the only person who believes that is you.
you must not have been paying attention to anything politicians have been doing for the last 20 years or so. Especially the right. They're all about gotcha ****. By answering as a legal expert would, she cannot be asked to be recused. By saying she won't define it because she's not an expert, that's exactly what happens in high profile cases across the country. For example, a cop cannot say that the DNA matches, an expert would have to say it either in court or with a legal document presented to the court as evidence. COunterint it would take an expert, not just someone saying "That's not how DNA works, I read an article online saying...."
You can choose to believe in the right wing troll side of the internet, we know it's where you go to live. What she said is what a lawyer would say or advise their client to say while underoath.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Lol
Zito, how do you define a woman?
Did they ever ask her why she raped me?
In what regards? In regards to who can use certain toilets? In regards to who can play certain sports? in regards to who can have access to certain types of medical procedures? I could keep asking. But I know the attempt at bad faith you're doing here.
If you go hard line definition. Does a person who was born with 2 x chromosomes, live their lives perhaps has some kids, so on so forth, has a hysterectomy, she's no longer a woman because a woman is an adult female, and a female in regards to memalia is "as the of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes." so she cannot bear offspring or produce eggs, she's not a woman.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
Wow we finally found a.word that has no definition!!
Feminists have been so effective they have effectively erased women from our vocabulary.
They are birthing people now. Bleeders. Etc
TLHLIM
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote