Page 77 of 154 FirstFirst ... 2767757677787987127 ... LastLast
Results 1,521 to 1,540 of 3063

Thread: Legal/scotus thread

  1. #1521
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    RBG hospitalized in B'more with "chills and a fever." Fortunately her name is not Molly Malone.

  2. #1522
    It's OVER 5,000! Runnin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    12,786
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,946
    Thanked in
    2,064 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    RBG hospitalized in B'more with "chills and a fever." Fortunately her name is not Molly Malone.
    Praying for her recovery.
    FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR

  3. #1523
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Legal eagles: what happens if Mulvaney is called as a witness during the Senate trial. How does Roberts rule? Can his ruling be appealed to the courts?
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  4. #1524
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,330
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,494
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,818
    Thanked in
    2,730 Posts
    Why would he appear in the Senate trial when he hasn't for the House? Republicans control the process. In a sense it will be Trump through McConnell writing the rules for his own trial. I am not sure how much Chief Justice Robert's had a say in it but Trump is going to go off on him at some point. Pretty sure he will go back to the Nevertrumper well.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  5. #1525
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunrevenge View Post
    Why would he appear in the Senate trial when he hasn't for the House? Republicans control the process. In a sense it will be Trump through McConnell writing the rules for his own trial. I am not sure how much Chief Justice Robert's had a say in it but Trump is going to go off on him at some point. Pretty sure he will go back to the Nevertrumper well.
    The Chief Justice presides and makes rulings. Senate can override his rulings with 51 votes. If Mulvaney is called, I would imagine the Chief Justice would rule that he is a relevant fact witness.

    It is a no lose move by the Democrats. Either they get their witness or they don't. And if they don't it certainly looks like suppression of relevant information.

    I think they will also ask the Chief Justice to rule on document requests. Such requests are a routine part of most trials.

    This could be an important part of the trial. How Roberts rules on those requests. And whether the Senate votes to override him if he rules favorably on them.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 11-24-2019 at 03:51 PM.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  6. #1526
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    The Chief Justice presides and makes rulings. Senate can override his rulings with 51 votes. If Mulvaney is called, I would imagine the Chief Justice would rule that he is a relevant fact witness.

    It is a no lose move by the Democrats. Either they get their witness or they don't. And if they don't it certainly looks like suppression of relevant information.

    I think they will also ask the Chief Justice to rule on document requests. Such requests are a routine part of most trials.

    This could be an important part of the trial. How Roberts rules on those requests. And whether the Senate votes to override him if he rules favorably on them.
    And is there any way the GOP could spin overruling a GOP Chief Justice on evidentiary rulings to not be a political disaster?
    Last edited by Snowman; 11-25-2019 at 08:45 AM. Reason: Stupid fingers

  7. #1527
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    And there is any way the GOP could spin overruling a GOP Chief Justice on evidentiary rulings to not be a political disaster?
    It would be hard. And if 3 GOP senators defected they couldn't muster the 51 votes needed to overrule the Chief Justice's rulings.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  8. #1528
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    RBG hospitalized in B'more with "chills and a fever." Fortunately her name is not Molly Malone.
    If she died tomorrow there would be idiots on the right celebrating her death. I find that repugnant. I don't care if you think she's the worst judge that ever lived and has been complicit in the destruction of countless lives, no one should celebrate at her death. It was despicable when the left celebrated Scalia's death and it will be despicable if the right celebrates Ginsburg's.

    I hope she recovers and returns to the bench. I disagree with much of her judicial philosophy but I don't wish her ill.

  9. #1529
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,330
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,494
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,818
    Thanked in
    2,730 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    And is there any way the GOP could spin overruling a GOP Chief Justice on evidentiary rulings to not be a political disaster?

    Trump will insist he is a NeverTrumper as soon as he does anything that isnt heavily biased in favor of Trump.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  10. #1530
    It's OVER 5,000! Runnin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    12,786
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,946
    Thanked in
    2,064 Posts
    McGhan cleared/ordered to testify. Isn't he just going to take the Fifth?
    FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR

  11. #1531
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Runnin View Post
    McGhan cleared/ordered to testify. Isn't he just going to take the Fifth?
    DOJ appealing the decision.

  12. #1532
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Runnin View Post
    McGhan cleared/ordered to testify. Isn't he just going to take the Fifth?
    Appeal and run out the clock
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  13. #1533
    It's OVER 5,000! Runnin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    12,786
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,946
    Thanked in
    2,064 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    DOJ appealing the decision.
    Indict the WH.
    FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR

  14. #1534
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    The SCOTUS returns to the bench today to hear cases. The first case up is an interesting one. It's a great example of how public rhetoric and legal arguments are often vastly different. The case centers on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. This is a proposed natural gas pipeline that will run up part of the east coast. The public arguments are over the benefits and costs of such a project. Proponents argue it will reduce energy costs in the mid-Atlantic region and provide cleaner energy. Opponents say it is a commitment to a future of fossil fuels, puts people at risk of leaks, and will require compression stations that will release toxic fumes.

    The legal arguments are quite different. The path of the pipeline runs through a National Forest. Under the Mineral Leasing Act, the US Forest Service has the power to grant mineral leasing rights in National Forests. This pipeline would qualify under that and so the company building it sought and received rights to build the pipeline through the National Forest.

    However, also running through that forest is the Appalachian Trail and the path of the pipeline crosses the trail. When the Appalachian Trail was created, the administration of the trail was given to the Park Service. The Park Service does not have the power to grant mineral leasing rights. So suit was brought saying the rights to build the pipeline through the National Forest do not grant the pipeline company rights to build the pipeline across the Appalachian Trail as the US Forest Service has no authority over the Appalachian Trail. The pipeline company has argued back that the Appalachian Trail in this area is on National Forest land and so the US Forest Service does have the authority.

    I'll be interested to see how the justices come down on this. The larger, environmental issue is one susceptible to ideological split. The legal question (which Federal agency has authority over a piece of land) does not.

  15. #1535
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Also happening today in the SCOTUS, certiorari was granted in the case Fulton v. Philadelphia. This checks several culture war boxes. Essentially, Catholic Social Services has been excluded from participating in Philadelphia's foster care system because they wont put children with same sex couples. So they've sued and the SCOTUS has taken up the case.

    The SCOTUS had to tackle this issue as the circuits have split on how religious discrimination claims of this kind are proven. It's possible the court could sidestep answering the question of whether conditioning participation in the program on a religious group violating their beliefs violates the first amendment. The Court could answer the question on how free exercise claims are proven in such a way that requires them to send the case back down for further proceedings making the other questions unripe for determination.

  16. #1536
    It's OVER 5,000! Runnin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    12,786
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,946
    Thanked in
    2,064 Posts
    What a huge disappointment in the verdicts of the Harvey Weinstein case. The degree to which money and power weighs into the exercise of justice shows just how corrupt America is at its core.
    FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR

  17. #1537
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,330
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,494
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,818
    Thanked in
    2,730 Posts
    Its virtually a death sentence for him and the judge isnt known for giving leniency in these kinds of cases.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  18. #1538
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    It's probably the best you could hope for in the Weinstein case. Proving sexual assaults without rape kits or independent witnesses is difficult. The older they are the harder it becomes.

  19. #1539
    It's OVER 5,000! cajunrevenge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    uranus
    Posts
    25,330
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,494
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,818
    Thanked in
    2,730 Posts
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...ult-7.amp.html




    The Vault 7 leaker who exposed the CIA's hacking tools and operations was convicted of lying to investigators and contempt but it was a hung jury on the serious charges. I wholeheartedly support all leakers no matter what. The government is not our friend, they actively work to tell is what opinions and views we can have. Democracy is not manipulating the vote to get the governments desired outcome. That's kind of the opposite of Democracy.
    "Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.

    It’s over."


    Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.

  20. #1540
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    As a moderate conservative with libertarian leanings, I'm happy with the selection of Kavanaugh. I think he'll be a bit more conservative than Roberts but not as conservative as Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. Not that conventional liberal-conservative categories are always a useful way of looking at the issues that come before the court. Certainly, in terms of credentials, intellect and temperament, Kavanaugh seems to be well qualified. I would say the same of candidates that were not located at the same point in the political spectrum if they met the requirements. Garland was well qualified. Gorsuch too.
    Bump
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

Similar Threads

  1. Cops gun down legal carrying citizen
    By zitothebrave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 07-15-2016, 02:58 PM
  2. SCOTUS
    By 57Brave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 169
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 08:21 AM
  3. 'Temporary Legal Status'
    By Hawk in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-22-2014, 10:02 AM
  4. Four big technology legal cases in 2014
    By Krgrecw in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 12:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •