Sen. Lisa Murkowski says an FBI investigation into the allegations would "clear up" questions.
She's right. It is the sensible thing to do.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski says an FBI investigation into the allegations would "clear up" questions.
She's right. It is the sensible thing to do.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Here's what we have.
Ford making a 35 year old allegation. Naming 4 witnesses who all went on record and 100% contradicted her story. To date, only Ford has been unwilling to give a testimony that would have criminal consequences. I would be stunned if Ford actually testifies.
Ramirez claims she was very drunk 35 years ago and maybe Brett Kavanaugh exposed his penis close to her face... Somebody who wasn't there heard that something may have happened from someone. But she isn't sure it was BK... And the witnesses named at the event have 100% contradicted her story. ( Reminder that these accusations were so weak that the Times and Post both refused to publish the story after the interview the witnesses)
BK has gone under oath to deny all claims.
Now youve got Super running around with his hair on fire like usual, but you'd think the more reasonable people could at least hold a shred of skepticism here.
when did BK deny these claims under oath
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
"Smith, Keyser, and Judge have denied Ford's allegation in letters to the committee under the penalty of felony perjury. Kavanaugh denied the allegation in person under oath before the committee. Ford remains the only witness to not have provided a statement to the committee."
the dems are brilliant for planting the seeds for this story all the way back in 2012. the long-con might work!
"Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly
“I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg
All 4 have issued statements to the committee denying the allegation... Only Ford has not.
http://www.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politi...ion/index.html
What are you gonna say when Ford doesn't show up on Thursday? Does it matter to you? Of course not, you decided he's guilty due to yearbooks and completely contradicted accusations.
Good on you
You’ve put a lot of eggs in that basket.
Two other people were allegedlyin the room. One is the guy with everything to lose, the other is a hyperpartisan activist who has written memoirs about being a blackout drunk. I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I’m certainly saying that it’s not unreasonable to weigh the respective accounts differently.
Last edited by Julio3000; 09-25-2018 at 03:15 PM.
Yeah, this is it, in a nutshell. To me, Kavanaugh’s credibility is undermined to the point that it’s not at all a stretch to think he’s lying.
He’s been less than forthright—or, if you prefer, outright lied—about several things in his testimony. And he’s sticking with a virgin choirboy defense that doesn’t even pass the sniff test. Neither of which means that he’s lying about these allegations, but let’s not pretend he’s a beacon of probity.
Aaron Rupar
Verified account @atrupar
Bill Cosby's publicist, Andrew Wyatt, claims both Cosby and Brett Kavanaugh
are victims of "a sex war" that is "going on in Washington today."
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
I’ve got a tangential question for you, sturg. Why are Ford’s allegations disqualifying if true, but Ramirez’s aren’t?