Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
This nonsense, whether valid or not, is what you get when ideology becomes the primary motivation in the selection of judges and when judges allow themselves to be so ideologically motivated that they become a super Congress.

This is not and has never been a righteous crusade against putting a sex criminal on the Supreme Court. Nor has it been a noble attempt to protect an innocent man. This is a political power play. The left doesn't care if any of these allegations are true. They could know for a fact they were false and they'd still be jumping on them in an attempt to gain a political edge. The right doesn't care if they're true or not either. They could know for a fact every allegation was the gospel truth and they'd still write them off in an attempt to gain a political edge of their own.

So no one should fool themselves into thinking they're getting the truth in this.
Don't you think though that unsubstantiated claims of rape is going a bit too far? Especially when there are those who were happy to go on the record saying that this didn't happen who were in the same circles at the time?