Results 1 to 20 of 3067

Thread: Legal/scotus thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #9
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Despite the seriousness of the allegations--and I think they are serious--I agree with Republicans that this is a stunt of sorts. It's nowhere near the territory of Clarence Thomas' office misbehavior, but different times set different standards. But I'm also with Runnin in that the Republicans have never really paid for not giving Garland a hearing. They wouldn't have had to hold a vote and they could have defeated him if they had held a vote, but the crass indifference to the process and disrespect to the administration was palpable. The evangelical right--for the most part--doesn't give two sh*ts about any of this. They will get their guy and, I would predict, the rights of any American on the margins will be diminished.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to 50PoundHead For This Useful Post:

    Super (09-19-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Cops gun down legal carrying citizen
    By zitothebrave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 07-15-2016, 02:58 PM
  2. SCOTUS
    By 57Brave in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 169
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 08:21 AM
  3. 'Temporary Legal Status'
    By Hawk in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-22-2014, 10:02 AM
  4. Four big technology legal cases in 2014
    By Krgrecw in forum LOCKER ROOM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 12:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •