Tax Bill

[thethe]

https://www.mediaite.com/online/twit...-gop-tax-bill/

And her correction wasn't even clear. She made it seem that the new tax bill put in the limit on deductible teacher expenses.

[Krgrecw]

You should check your sources:

https://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/n...las-as-it.html

In an email to the Dallas Business Journal, AT&T spokesperson Marty Richter said that the company is consolidating the call center work into other U.S. facilities. Employees will be given the opportunity to relocate to San Antonio or Earth City, Missouri, with a relocation allowance.


So not only are they still trying to keep workers they are actually planning on paying some that are impacted. But again, why would you care about doing research as long as it fits your narrative. I don't have the time to research all the layoffs but I'm sure this is not the only one structured as the Dallas office. Pathetic.

A lot of directv installers are being let go by at&t

[thewupk]

A lot of directv installers are being let go by at&t

That has more to do with people dropping satellite than anything else. Dish Network is in the same boat.

[57Brave]

LOLGOP
‏ @LOLGOP
2m2 minutes ago

Congratulations to everyone who was sure that hearing

“Merry Christmas” often enough would soothe

37 years of conservatives gutting the middle class!

[thethe]

LOLGOP
‏ @LOLGOP
2m2 minutes ago

Congratulations to everyone who was sure that hearing

“Merry Christmas” often enough would soothe

37 years of conservatives gutting the middle class!

So conservatives were in power this whole time? But I know you won't respond because all you can do is parrot LOLGOP thoughts.

[57Brave]

pretty much so

you remember how it was before the air traffic controllers

or Harry and Louise.

Gingrich Revolution ring a bell ?
.................................................. ................................

Feel free to refute the claim but please show our math

[57Brave]

So conservatives were in power this whole time? But I know you won't respond because all you can do is parrot LOLGOP thoughts.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.f066b30244c2

[goldfly]

He keeps bringing it up because its a real world example of how your economic principles fail. They fail every time.

again, that isn't how i view the world but

keep bringing up the dumb example

[sturg33]

LOLGOP
‏ @LOLGOP
2m2 minutes ago

Congratulations to everyone who was sure that hearing

“Merry Christmas” often enough would soothe

37 years of conservatives gutting the middle class!

hmmmmm



Let's look here.

In 1979, the lower-middle and poor made up 23% of people. That number has since shrunk to 12%!

Meanwhile, the middle, upper-middle, and rich has grown from 76.4% in 1979 to 89% today.

I know math is hard... but I'm seeing more people in the middle class, and less people in the poor. It just so happens we're graduating more and more people above than below.

[57Brave]

For one that doesn't understand math, I add middle class

gray 30+46+16= 92
blue 52+26+8 = 86

curious to read the accompanying article.
With like I always say Grasshopper, context
Is there a link ?
..........

also read the rich =
.4 in the gray
11 in the blue

..................

help me again, perhaps I am reading this wrong,

the middle, lower middle not even counting the poor are (-) 28
the upper middle and rich have gained (+) 29
.............

without context , on its face, your graph shows a gigantic upward redistribution of wealth.
See if you can find the link. Be curious to see the explanation that supports what I assume to be your claim

[57Brave]

had never seen this website before. Thanks for the vine:

This:

http://apps.urban.org/features/wealt...uality-charts/

[sturg33]

For one that doesn't understand math, I add middle class

gray 30+46+16= 92
blue 52+26+8 = 86

curious to read the accompanying article.
With like I always say Grasshopper, context
Is there a link ?
..........

also read the rich =
.4 in the gray
11 in the blue

..................

help me again, perhaps I am reading this wrong,

the middle, lower middle not even counting the poor are (-) 28
the upper middle and rich have gained (+) 29
.............

without context , on its face, your graph shows a gigantic upward redistribution of wealth.
See if you can find the link. Be curious to see the explanation that supports what I assume to be your claim

I'm really not sure what to tell you if you interpret those numbers anyway but positive.

There are far less poor and lower middle class. There are far more upper middle and rich. This means in aggregate, people's lives are substantially better. Please tell you me understand that and are comprehending that.

article
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/21/news...ass/index.html

[Tapate50]

For one that doesn't understand math, I add middle class

gray 30+46+16= 92
blue 52+26+8 = 86

curious to read the accompanying article.
With like I always say Grasshopper, context
Is there a link ?
..........

also read the rich =
.4 in the gray
11 in the blue

..................

help me again, perhaps I am reading this wrong,

the middle, lower middle not even counting the poor are (-) 28
the upper middle and rich have gained (+) 29
.............

without context , on its face, your graph shows a gigantic upward redistribution of wealth.
See if you can find the link. Be curious to see the explanation that supports what I assume to be your claim

Wow.

[57Brave]

I'm really not sure what to tell you if you interpret those numbers anyway but positive.

There are far less poor and lower middle class. There are far more upper middle and rich. This means in aggregate, people's lives are substantially better. Please tell you me understand that and are comprehending that.

article
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/21/news...ass/index.html

positive if you occupy 2 of the 5 categories.

This article linked inside of the original CNN Money
http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/09/news...-class/?iid=EL

Is there an article explaining the Urban Institure graph, because guessing here it has a far different explanation than you assume

[AerchAngel]

I'm really not sure what to tell you if you interpret those numbers anyway but positive.

There are far less poor and lower middle class. There are far more upper middle and rich. This means in aggregate, people's lives are substantially better. Please tell you me understand that and are comprehending that.

article
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/21/news...ass/index.html

57 is stupid. I don't even think he passed the 8th grade. So this is not unusual. He is a LIV you know, right?

[sturg33]

positive if you occupy 2 of the 5 categories.

This article linked inside of the original CNN Money
http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/09/news...-class/?iid=EL

Is there an article explaining the Urban Institure graph, because guessing here it has a far different explanation than you assume

57, what do you believe is the healthier situation. The graph from 1979 or the graph from 2014?

Just answer that and we'll go from there

[AerchAngel]

57, what do you believe is the healthier situation. The graph from 1979 or the graph from 2014?

Just answer that and we'll go from there

his addle mind can't comprehend common sense.

I fully understood what you post, but I am not a partisan hack like he is so I see the whole picture and not the Liberal slanted version.

[sturg33]

57 is stupid. I don't even think he passed the 8th grade. So this is not unusual. He is a LIV you know, right?

I'm legit concerned that people like him want to be involved in fiscal policy.

This reminds me when goldy said the stock run up since election looked like normal to him

[AerchAngel]

I'm legit concerned that people like him want to be involved in fiscal policy.

This reminds me when goldy said the stock run up since election looked like normal to him

Just remember that he is stupid and he is fed by partisan hacks that know he is dumb enough to do as they say, sheople as you will. That is how I view him. He's a moron. Plain and simple.

[thethe]

I'm legit concerned that people like him want to be involved in fiscal policy.

This reminds me when goldy said the stock run up since election looked like normal to him

All he is told in his echo chamber is that people with money are bad. What do you expect?