Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Thinking about a new way to do draft and international signings

  1. #1
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts

    Thinking about a new way to do draft and international signings

    So I was thinking about the draft and the international market and thought it might be interesting to look at a different option that the way it is currently done.

    So was thinking why not just eliminate the draft altogether, no domestic, no international. Instead, give teams a limit for a pool of money based off a formula that they can spend each year. For instance, the teams that play in the top 6 markets get $25M to spend, the next 6 $26M, and so on to $30M. That amount has to cover the costs of running any international academies, cost of scouts, etc. so a team like the Yankees couldn't just sign the best scouts by paying more and have 5 Dominican academies, etc. Let's say it costs $1M a year to run a Dominican academy and you have 3 because you want to look for gems from that area, fine but that cost comes off your available pool.

    Teams could spend their money anyway they want to: 50 players at $500K each or 1 player at $25M, it's up to the team. However, posting fees would count. So, a team signs a Japanese player an pays a $10M posting fee then that counts toward the total. If a team goes over their allotted amount then it comes of their next year's available amount at double the rate (so the Braves exceed their amount by 500K this year they lose $1M out of their pool next year).

    It would give more freedom to the players to choose where they want to play. It would allow teams to develop strategies specific to their own current needs - if you are a rebuilding team you might go for higher end talent that is further away while if you are close to competing you might focus on players who could arrive and have an impact more quickly even if it cost at a higher rate to do so.

    So, take a player like Harper out of HS who has Boras as an agent and he demands a ML contract and a $25M signing bonus. Welp, ok. If a team wants to do that it is up to them. BUT, they will then have to fill their minor league teams around Harper with nobodies with no talent.

    I think it could set up some interesting dynamics and can't see how it would benefit the big money teams, certainly not more than the leverage of college currently used to drive guys like Van Poppel and Groome to their desired teams or the circus that is the import of Japanese players.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Horsehide Harry For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (02-02-2018)

  3. #2
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    I think an international draft is the better way to go. Isn't that the easiest way to put an end to all the handshake deal BS that goes on?

    Players that young shouldn't be able to have a say in what teams they go to.

  4. #3
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    I think an international draft is the better way to go. Isn't that the easiest way to put an end to all the handshake deal BS that goes on?

    Players that young shouldn't be able to have a say in what teams they go to.
    I think an international draft wouldn't solve much. Teams with more money would hire better scouts who would identify players earlier and would pay the Buscon who would then hide the prospect from the eyes of competing scouts. So when the draft comes around players would come out of nowhere because teams would have had them stashed (as much as possible) waiting to be called.

    My way above, teams could just choose to focus their efforts domestically if they desired.

  5. #4
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    I think an international draft wouldn't solve much. Teams with more money would hire better scouts who would identify players earlier and would pay the Buscon who would then hide the prospect from the eyes of competing scouts. So when the draft comes around players would come out of nowhere because teams would have had them stashed (as much as possible) waiting to be called.

    My way above, teams could just choose to focus their efforts domestically if they desired.
    I assume that's possible but I wouldn't see it playing out that way.

  6. #5
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,857
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Large markets would feast on this. They don’t need as deep of farm system since they can buy star power. They could spend big on the Harpers of the worlds where smaller markets have to build volume to find the diamonds. In addition. More prospects are going to be drawn to larger markets because they have potential to make more money. So smaller markets would always have to out bid. Sorry. This is a bad idea.
    Coppy

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    Hudson2 (02-01-2018), Jaw (02-01-2018)

  8. #6
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    18,946
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,857
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,329
    Thanked in
    3,353 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    I think an international draft wouldn't solve much. Teams with more money would hire better scouts who would identify players earlier and would pay the Buscon who would then hide the prospect from the eyes of competing scouts. So when the draft comes around players would come out of nowhere because teams would have had them stashed (as much as possible) waiting to be called.

    My way above, teams could just choose to focus their efforts domestically if they desired.
    This is easier to do in today’s system. Your system wouldn’t fix that. It would encourage more crap like what coppy pulled.
    Coppy

  9. #7
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,176
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    954
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    682
    Thanked in
    482 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    So I was thinking about the draft and the international market and thought it might be interesting to look at a different option that the way it is currently done.

    So was thinking why not just eliminate the draft altogether, no domestic, no international. Instead, give teams a limit for a pool of money based off a formula that they can spend each year. For instance, the teams that play in the top 6 markets get $25M to spend, the next 6 $26M, and so on to $30M. That amount has to cover the costs of running any international academies, cost of scouts, etc. so a team like the Yankees couldn't just sign the best scouts by paying more and have 5 Dominican academies, etc. Let's say it costs $1M a year to run a Dominican academy and you have 3 because you want to look for gems from that area, fine but that cost comes off your available pool.

    Teams could spend their money anyway they want to: 50 players at $500K each or 1 player at $25M, it's up to the team. However, posting fees would count. So, a team signs a Japanese player an pays a $10M posting fee then that counts toward the total. If a team goes over their allotted amount then it comes of their next year's available amount at double the rate (so the Braves exceed their amount by 500K this year they lose $1M out of their pool next year).

    It would give more freedom to the players to choose where they want to play. It would allow teams to develop strategies specific to their own current needs - if you are a rebuilding team you might go for higher end talent that is further away while if you are close to competing you might focus on players who could arrive and have an impact more quickly even if it cost at a higher rate to do so.

    So, take a player like Harper out of HS who has Boras as an agent and he demands a ML contract and a $25M signing bonus. Welp, ok. If a team wants to do that it is up to them. BUT, they will then have to fill their minor league teams around Harper with nobodies with no talent.

    I think it could set up some interesting dynamics and can't see how it would benefit the big money teams, certainly not more than the leverage of college currently used to drive guys like Van Poppel and Groome to their desired teams or the circus that is the import of Japanese players.
    I doubt the big boys (teams in big markets) would ever allow that to happen. They like having a built in market advantage and will stop at nothing to keep it.

    The best example is the Braves coming up with a way for a mid market team to act like a big market team (The Superstation), only to have MLB make them divide the revenue, thus restoring the big market imbalance.

    Your idea might move toward a more level playing field, but I am not sure MLB really wants a more level playing field.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mfree80 For This Useful Post:

    Jaw (02-01-2018), JohnAdcox (02-04-2018)

  11. #8
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    932
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    425
    Thanked in
    300 Posts
    Just include international players in the regular draft, the way the NHL does with its draft. Then, similarly, allow teams to trade picks.

  12. #9
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    Large markets would feast on this. They don’t need as deep of farm system since they can buy star power. They could spend big on the Harpers of the worlds where smaller markets have to build volume to find the diamonds. In addition. More prospects are going to be drawn to larger markets because they have potential to make more money. So smaller markets would always have to out bid. Sorry. This is a bad idea.
    Not really.

    Let's say the Yankees wanted to sign Otani. They could (just as they could this year) but his cost would come out of what they had to spend overall. So let's say they had an initial pool of $25M to spend. They had 2 foreign (Dominican) academies that cost $1M each to run, so their total is automatically $23M. Then let's say they $10M signing bonus and a $10M posting fee for Otani. That would leave them $3M to sign all their other new players, both foreign and domestic. Some of that obviously would go to feeding their academies, let's say half. So, they end up with about $1.5M left to sign domestic players or the equivalent of a late second rounder.

    As for allowing trades of picks, my system would allow for that after the player had been with his team for a year. So, a 16 yo Dominican signs, he's eligible to be traded one year later.

    Teams would not be allowed to trade their pool money.

    But the players would be free with signing with who they wish. Foreign players currently CAN do this. I see no reason that a domestic player shouldn't be able to say: "I've got a better money offer from the Red Sox, but I've always loved the Braves or Royals or whoever, so I'll sign for less." Also, I think you would get young players looking at opportunity when they sign. Let's say there's a young RF who's supposed to be the next big thing. Do you not think he will look (and his agents, handlers, family, friends) at the Yankees and say "hey, they just traded for Stanton who has a 10 year contract.?

    I think your large market teams would almost always feel the "win now" pressure and go for higher end talent that will fill needs quickly when given a limited pool from which to work from every year.

    I think you add in FA compensation as well. Lose a QO free agent, get another $2M added to your pool amount...etc.

    I think this would create endless opportunities for teams to try to find value that meets their needs as a team while exerting economic pressure on the teams with unlimited (normally) resources.

  13. #10
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    Just eliminate both and let the kids earn their market value.

  14. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    37,264
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,295
    Thanked in
    3,676 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Knucksie View Post
    Just include international players in the regular draft, the way the NHL does with its draft. Then, similarly, allow teams to trade picks.
    This is what I want. If you do it though, international players would have to meet same age/graduation from HS requirements domestic kids do

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to msstate7 For This Useful Post:

    Knucksie (02-02-2018)

  16. #12
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    101
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    137 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    Not really.

    Let's say the Yankees wanted to sign Otani. They could (just as they could this year) but his cost would come out of what they had to spend overall. So let's say they had an initial pool of $25M to spend. They had 2 foreign (Dominican) academies that cost $1M each to run, so their total is automatically $23M. Then let's say they $10M signing bonus and a $10M posting fee for Otani. That would leave them $3M to sign all their other new players, both foreign and domestic. Some of that obviously would go to feeding their academies, let's say half. So, they end up with about $1.5M left to sign domestic players or the equivalent of a late second rounder.

    As for allowing trades of picks, my system would allow for that after the player had been with his team for a year. So, a 16 yo Dominican signs, he's eligible to be traded one year later.

    Teams would not be allowed to trade their pool money.

    But the players would be free with signing with who they wish. Foreign players currently CAN do this. I see no reason that a domestic player shouldn't be able to say: "I've got a better money offer from the Red Sox, but I've always loved the Braves or Royals or whoever, so I'll sign for less." Also, I think you would get young players looking at opportunity when they sign. Let's say there's a young RF who's supposed to be the next big thing. Do you not think he will look (and his agents, handlers, family, friends) at the Yankees and say "hey, they just traded for Stanton who has a 10 year contract.?

    I think your large market teams would almost always feel the "win now" pressure and go for higher end talent that will fill needs quickly when given a limited pool from which to work from every year.

    I think you add in FA compensation as well. Lose a QO free agent, get another $2M added to your pool amount...etc.

    I think this would create endless opportunities for teams to try to find value that meets their needs as a team while exerting economic pressure on the teams with unlimited (normally) resources.
    I think that would also lead to some extremely fishy accounting. Who’s going to check these “academies” to see how much they’re really costing to run? It would lead to much more under the table deals with players and handlers in order to sign players for under cap and then just give them a contract in a year or so as a reward.

  17. #13
    NL Rookie of the Year drewdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,133
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    924
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    975
    Thanked in
    510 Posts
    I had a new idea that I already forwarded to AA and the rest of the FO. What if we offer contracts to international prospects' friends and family to sweeten the pot and get them to fit under the penalty? Arranging housing and transportation for so many additional players could be tough, but I guess we could find a hotel and get them cars or something. Probably need to go ahead and lock these guys up when they're 14 or 15 though, so they'd have to lie about their age in order to drive.

  18. #14
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Knucksie View Post
    Just include international players in the regular draft, the way the NHL does with its draft. Then, similarly, allow teams to trade picks.
    And the NBA....and the NFL

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to TheBravos For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (02-04-2018)

  20. #15
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mqt View Post
    Just eliminate both and let the kids earn their market value.
    The Libertarian in me agrees with you one hundred percent. The baseball fan in me wants to hurt you. Luckily the political side of me is probably stronger lol

  21. #16
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    932
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    425
    Thanked in
    300 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBravos View Post
    And the NBA....and the NFL
    The NFL thumps it's chest about reach outside of North America, but appeal is limited. A foreign-born player is usually from a US college in the draft. The NBA has quite a bit more pull internationally, but baseball and hockey have several more competitive countries as power centers, beside just the US, as opposed to occasional potential star emerging from a smaller country.

Similar Threads

  1. 2018 DRAFT LIST AND SIGNINGS
    By rico43 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 519
    Last Post: 09-09-2018, 08:44 PM
  2. International draft thread
    By TheBravos in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-03-2017, 09:19 PM
  3. International Signings: A Ten Year Retrospective
    By nsacpi in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-24-2014, 11:38 AM
  4. What is Samsung thinking?
    By gtcway in forum Fulton County Fire & BBQ
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-30-2013, 01:26 PM
  5. Current Braves International Signings List
    By rico43 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 12:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •