I haven't stated a position here.
I mean, if I have, feel free to point it out. Otherwise, let's try to keep on topic.
I'm probing your stated position; the one you've gone back and forth on three times now.
You want to legislate people shooting at cut outs that depict humans.
Like this:
Oh, but no, you don't mean that. Oh, yes, obviously that doesn't actually depict a human (except, of course, it does).
Just obviously bad people. Like Hitler.
So who defines whose paper pictures we can shoot at and whose paper pictures we can't shoot at?
This is what we call as slippery slope.
What you've posited is naïve and simple-minded.
You should probably give it some more thought.