The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-...combat-charges
Man shot and killed in gang war after two factions of gang in Chicago shoot 70 rounds on video, no charges filed
Prosecutors cited mutual combat for the free pass of gang war ….
Last edited by Tapate50; 11-16-2021 at 09:41 AM.
Ivermectin Man
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ntary-rcna7479
Parents of a school shooter charged with involuntary manslaughter seemingly have gone on the run. **** these people.
"Donald Trump will serve a second term as president of the United States.
It’s over."
Little Thethe Nov 19, 2020.
Runnin (12-03-2021)
If anything these parents got off light. The prosecutor said that a teacher saw him writing disturbing things with images of shooting people that morning. The parents were called in to take him to see someone and refused. Later that day he committed the shooting with the gun that they had just bought him (straw purchase) for his birthday.
I think parents need to be charged more often in these school shootings when the kid brings in a gun that wasn't secured. Maybe that will convince more of them to take notice of their kids troubles and lock the guns up to be on the safe side.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
acesfull86 (12-04-2021)
acesfull86 (12-04-2021), Jaw (12-04-2021)
It's like they couldn't imagine that there would eventually be very unpleasant consequences to how they were raising their son. Their lives are now ruined, even if they have no compassion for the other students and families and their losses.
It's just such an ignorant and destructive way to live.
Last edited by Runnin; 12-04-2021 at 01:48 AM.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR
Runnin (12-05-2021)
or Rittenhouse.
I’m going to *gulp* disagree with this, despite agreeing with it wholeheartedly emotionally. I think charging the parents with manslaughter is a bit excessive despite finding them morally guilty, as it’s judging the crime by the consequence rather than the act itself. If they had left the gun out and the kid never did it, would we charge them equally because he could have committed an atrocity? I’d be happy with charging them with some sort of negligence, but manslaughter feels a lot like the issue Striker brought up in the Arbery case with the guy who didn’t shoot Arbery getting charged with murder.
I’m very open to changing my mind if there are any relevant reasons to do so, because **** these people.
Jaw (12-04-2021)
How's bouts we make even a little difficult to obtain these weapons.
People will aways get and forever been stupid.
Let's quit giving them the means to act out their cruelty and stupidity
Lot of ****ty parenting is the main problem in most cases
That’s just getting worse not well adjusted individuals
Ivermectin Man
Jaw (12-04-2021)
You MGT's have been spouting this BS since Columbine.
1998
What’s a MGT?
I'm with you if the gun is stolen but feel like parents have to share consequences of their kids actions when they put their kid in a position to screw up. On the other hand, we would never charge the parents if they bought the kid a car and cell phone and the kid killed someone while using both. I don't know, it's a complicated problem. I guess not taking the kid home when they were called in that morning is what triggered these charges.
Go get him!
Founding member of the Whiny Little Bitches and Pricks Club
Since America is such a safe country, nothing wrong with having a little fun with the Libs in the Christmas photo. All our Church friends will love it.
And point the uzi right at Momma's head. Don't worry about the Safeties. We know they aren't loaded.
Last edited by Runnin; 12-05-2021 at 02:23 AM.
FFF - BB, BB, 2B, HR, 2B, HR, 1B, BB, BB, 1B, BB, BB, HR