Stossel is a treasure
And Goldy is an idiot
Stossel is a treasure
And Goldy is an idiot
Oh man
He thinks I’m dumb. My feelings are hurt
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
The guy who went to a range with a cut out of teenager who survived a mass shooting and shot at said target should be investigatedOriginally Posted by thethe
So
I disagree that they shouldn’t be looked at
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
You made a dumb point then couldn't back it up. Ho hum
Hawk, you can't fix stupidity.
you don't agree that that person should maybe be looked at to be unstable and might should be looked at as a gun owner?
weird
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
of course you can
it's usually very slow moving but education has been progressing for the last couple thousands of years
"For there is always light, if only we are brave enough to see it. If only we are brave enough to be it." Amanda Gorman
"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross"
unless of course they carry a Koran or trying to sell cigarettes
why do you hate America ?
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
Where did you get he was shooting at cutouts of student survivors?
Let me get this straight: you don’t believe that violent video games/a violent entertainment culture might should be “looked at” ... but you want to restrict paper targets at gun ranges?
I think we all agree that using real depictions of people as targets is tasteless, but hella slippery slope advocating that we should investigate those individuals.
Last edited by Hawk; 04-24-2018 at 02:12 PM.
A thing that came out of 9/11 was obvious signs there was something fishy with the "terrorists" - a lack of "connecting the dots"
To my mind and I am sure you disagree, just for sport, a red flag is being waved by carrying a picture of a person into a gun range and is a click or two above "tasteless"
But hey, that's just me
Last edited by 57Brave; 04-24-2018 at 02:10 PM.
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
By that logic, a person who uses the human body cutout while at a shooting range is homicidal.
57Brave (04-24-2018)
It seems like some folks are trying to have it both ways here. On one hand, there are complaints that law enforcement has failed to intervene earlier with various folks who've subsequently proved to be murderers. On the other hand, such intervention is considered to be an unlawful infringement of civil liberties. I'm not advocating for a particular position, just pointing out the tension, as I did earlier in the thread.
Seems to me that if you think the onus is on societal forces to head off these incidents before they happen, you'd be open to a potentially burdensome amount of scrutiny towards people who are publically, vocally advocating shooting people.
23 tips to police and FBI about a kid threatening to kills students = kid legally going to gun range
/Tdsjulio
Just an absurd comparison.
Natural Immunity Croc
when you vacation you often remember the rainy days more so than a relaxing day in the sun.
It was a very apt comparison.
Like terrorist attacks, law enforcement seldom beats their chest over stopping a crime before it happens
The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is to make sure he doesn’t get a gun.
So you do think that local law enforcement or the Feds should investigate people, to the point of confiscating their guns, based on tips or social media posts? Illuminate me.
Haha, I notice that your going ad hominem on me correlates to when you holler that something is unconstitutional and I cite case law that shows the opposite, etc ad nauseam.
What?
What did I holler was unconstitutional?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote