Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Return of the Four-man Rotation

  1. #1
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts

    Return of the Four-man Rotation

    Our resident cranky columnist in Minnesota (Patrick Reusse) has written a lot about baseball over the years and his latest column talks about Tampa Bay returning to a four-man rotation. I think Enscheff mentioned this strategy last fall in a couple of posts about how pitching strategy is changing and what Tampa Bay is doing appears to bear that out. In some sense, it's a return to those thrilling days of yesteryear with more statistical back-up to justify the strategy.

    Link: http://www.startribune.com/rays-may-...ion/476434263/

  2. #2
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Pitching will eventually morph into a handful of studs going 3 times through the lineup, and the rest of the pitchers being limited to 1-2 times through the order.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (03-10-2018)

  4. #3
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,579
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    That's an interesting philosophy. Baseball is certainly evolving.

  5. #4
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Pitching will eventually morph into a handful of studs going 3 times through the lineup, and the rest of the pitchers being limited to 1-2 times through the order.
    Braves have tons of guys to fill those roles

  6. #5
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,579
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    Braves have tons of guys to fill those roles
    That could be a great way to leverage all the pitching depth. How many of these guys do you keep in the pen assuming a four man rotation?

  7. #6
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,669
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,721
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,744
    Thanked in
    5,837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    That's an interesting philosophy. Baseball is certainly evolving.
    It always has and will as long as the game is being played. It's also a copy league so once this catches on in a few places then you will see it en masse.

  8. #7
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    It always has and will as long as the game is being played. It's also a copy league so once this catches on in a few places then you will see it en masse.
    But this strategy is a throw-back of sorts. Up until the 1970s, the four-man rotation ruled. Of course, pitching staffs usually consisted of 10 guys back then in the pre-DH era. The different spin here is that unlike back then when the complete game was an expectation and not a rarity, relief pitchers play a much larger role now. The interesting thing will be seeing if and how a lot of one-inning relief guys can transform their game to go two (or three innings). Possible new niche for guys who aren't making it as a starter.

    You guys should take a look back at pitcher usage in the 1950s and 1960s and see how staffs were constituted and used back then. A lot of guys who appeared in 35 or 40 games with 10 to 15 starts. Very few one-inning relievers. Aces used in save situations. Can't do a lot of that anymore with the greater amount of stress placed on arms because of concentration on the fastball, but instructive nonetheless.

  9. #8
    Swallowed by Mark Bowman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,546
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    86
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,744
    Thanked in
    1,270 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    But this strategy is a throw-back of sorts. Up until the 1970s, the four-man rotation ruled. Of course, pitching staffs usually consisted of 10 guys back then in the pre-DH era. The different spin here is that unlike back then when the complete game was an expectation and not a rarity, relief pitchers play a much larger role now. The interesting thing will be seeing if and how a lot of one-inning relief guys can transform their game to go two (or three innings). Possible new niche for guys who aren't making it as a starter.

    You guys should take a look back at pitcher usage in the 1950s and 1960s and see how staffs were constituted and used back then. A lot of guys who appeared in 35 or 40 games with 10 to 15 starts. Very few one-inning relievers. Aces used in save situations. Can't do a lot of that anymore with the greater amount of stress placed on arms because of concentration on the fastball, but instructive nonetheless.
    We can also use as a model Iron Joe McGinnity, who starred when you were a kid.

  10. #9
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,261
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,000
    Thanked in
    6,108 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    But this strategy is a throw-back of sorts. Up until the 1970s, the four-man rotation ruled. Of course, pitching staffs usually consisted of 10 guys back then in the pre-DH era. The different spin here is that unlike back then when the complete game was an expectation and not a rarity, relief pitchers play a much larger role now. The interesting thing will be seeing if and how a lot of one-inning relief guys can transform their game to go two (or three innings). Possible new niche for guys who aren't making it as a starter.

    You guys should take a look back at pitcher usage in the 1950s and 1960s and see how staffs were constituted and used back then. A lot of guys who appeared in 35 or 40 games with 10 to 15 starts. Very few one-inning relievers. Aces used in save situations. Can't do a lot of that anymore with the greater amount of stress placed on arms because of concentration on the fastball, but instructive nonetheless.
    The Rays 4 man rotation is nothing like the olden day 4 man rotations.

    The Rays are using 4 traditional starters and allowing the BP to handle the job of the 5th starter.

    Eventually, teams will move towards having a couple guys allowed to go 180+ innings, and several guys going 100+ innings. They will use the 10 day DL and minor league options to rotate enough arms into the mix to make it work.

    The whole idea will be to virtually eliminate pitchers seeing a lineup a 3rd time...exactly like playoff baseball is played now.

  11. #10
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,263
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,058
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,693
    Thanked in
    3,881 Posts
    Aren’t the angels going with a 6 man staff?
    Ivermectin Man

  12. #11
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The Rays 4 man rotation is nothing like the olden day 4 man rotations.

    The Rays are using 4 traditional starters and allowing the BP to handle the job of the 5th starter.

    Eventually, teams will move towards having a couple guys allowed to go 180+ innings, and several guys going 100+ innings. They will use the 10 day DL and minor league options to rotate enough arms into the mix to make it work.

    The whole idea will be to virtually eliminate pitchers seeing a lineup a 3rd time...exactly like playoff baseball is played now.
    I think the key to making the Rays plan work is having 3 or 4 guys in the pen who can go 2-4 innings. It is easier to make this work in the American League. I like the idea. It opens up a way to use a type of pitcher who has been squeezed out in recent years by all the power arms that teams have populated their pens with. This would be the marginal starting pitcher who doesn't have a great strikeout pitch but has enough of a repertoire to get through a major league lineup twice. If a couple of them also have options and can be shuttled back and forth between the majors and AAA I think it could work nicely for a team like the Rays.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (03-10-2018), Braves1976 (03-10-2018)

  14. #12
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I think the key to making the Rays plan work is having 3 or 4 guys in the pen who can go 2-4 innings. It is easier to make this work in the American League. I like the idea. It opens up a way to use a type of pitcher who has been squeezed out in recent years by all the power arms that teams have populated their pens with. This would be the marginal starting pitcher who doesn't have a great strikeout pitch but has enough of a repertoire to get through a major league lineup twice. If a couple of them also have options and can be shuttled back and forth between the majors and AAA I think it could work nicely for a team like the Rays.
    I think the biggest issue will be breaking the recent "one-inning" mindset that has been the modus operandi for most relief pitchers. I will be curious to see how big league teams run their Triple A pitching staffs. Like you say, C-minus starting pitchers may have a new career opening.

  15. #13
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,579
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,507
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,179
    Thanked in
    3,898 Posts
    Would have been a good role for chuck james.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thethe For This Useful Post:

    cajunrevenge (03-10-2018), JohnAdcox (03-10-2018)

  17. #14
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    Would have been a good role for chuck james.
    Exactly. And maybe guys like Wisler, Sims and Fried.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to nsacpi For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (03-10-2018)

  19. #15
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    I think the biggest issue will be breaking the recent "one-inning" mindset that has been the modus operandi for most relief pitchers. I will be curious to see how big league teams run their Triple A pitching staffs. Like you say, C-minus starting pitchers may have a new career opening.
    I think there are some choices to be made about how to build a pen. Teams have been skewing toward the high effort high strikeout guys, but maybe the pendulum starts swinging back to the multi-inning types.

    Thinking about the Braves pen this year. Viz and Minter are obviously more of the high effort high strikeout type. But we have quite a few who could go two--Ramirez, Winkler, Gomez, Freeman. The thing is with those four it is probably just two. The wrinkle the Rays are showing an interest in requires some guys who can go 3-4 innings. Presumably we will have one guy like that, whether it be Kazmir, Wisler, Sims or Fried. Obviously we are not trying to do what the Rays are. But if we wanted to, we do have guys like Kazmir, Wisler, Sims, Fried. Maybe add Touki, Weigel and Sanchez to the list in a year or so.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  20. #16
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    13,995
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,888
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,678
    Thanked in
    4,941 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I think there are some choices to be made about how to build a pen. Teams have been skewing toward the high effort high strikeout guys, but maybe the pendulum starts swinging back to the multi-inning types.

    Thinking about the Braves pen this year. Viz and Minter are obviously more of the high effort high strikeout type. But we have quite a few who could go two--Ramirez, Winkler, Gomez, Freeman. The thing is with those four it is probably just two. The wrinkle the Rays are showing an interest in requires some guys who can go 3-4 innings. Presumably we will have one guy like that, whether it be Kazmir, Wisler, Sims or Fried. Obviously we are not trying to do what the Rays are. But if we wanted to, we do have guys like Kazmir, Wisler, Sims, Fried. Maybe add Touki, Weigel and Sanchez to the list in a year or so.
    In that scenario, do guys like Moylan become a luxury? Is the LOOGY going to go the way of the dinosaur.

  21. #17
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 50PoundHead View Post
    In that scenario, do guys like Moylan become a luxury? Is the LOOGY going to go the way of the dinosaur.
    I think there is probably always room for one specialist regardless of which way you go. Maybe 2 in an 8-man pen. If we go with a 7-man pen we probably should not carry both Brothers and Moylan, who need to be used mostly against same-sided hitters. With an 8-man pen it is more feasible.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 03-10-2018 at 06:20 PM.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  22. #18
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,433
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,384
    Thanked in
    7,533 Posts
    It will be interesting to see how Snitker's bullpen management changes this year, now that he is getting some different analytical input. Subtle topic change here. The input last year seems to have consisted of Hart berating him over bringing Jim Johnson in during a high leverage situation.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

Similar Threads

  1. GDT 9-5: THE RETURN OF MAD MAX AND THE GRAVEDIGGERS
    By Hulavol in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 256
    Last Post: 09-06-2019, 04:01 PM
  2. GDT 7/27 THE RETURN OF MAXIMUM DUVALL....
    By Hulavol in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 07-28-2019, 11:39 AM
  3. GDT 8/9/19 - RETURN OF THE ATTACK OF THE ANIBAL
    By Hulavol in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 195
    Last Post: 08-11-2018, 10:43 PM
  4. 10/2 GDT: Return of the immortal Heyward
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-03-2015, 02:24 PM
  5. AJC: Timing May Not Be Right For Chipper To Return
    By CrimsonCowboy in forum 2023: Celebrating Our 10th Year Here
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-27-2014, 09:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •