Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Some changes to defensive metrics

  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts

    Some changes to defensive metrics

    FG just made a post about how they have improved their defensive metric, UZR. Long story short, they now base hit designations on hang time rather than someone deciding to call it a LD, FB, or GB.

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/inst...nd-uzr-update/

    They then retroactively applied the results all the way back to 2012. This obviously changed some players' defensive ratings...sometimes by a lot. How much? Here's a sample of some of the largest changes from recent seasons:

    2016 Cespedes from -12.1 to -4.0, a 8.2 change for the better.
    2016 Pillar from 21.5 to 12.3, a 9.2 change for the worse.

    2015 Uribe from -1.3 to 6.7, a 8.0 change for the better.
    2015 Kiermaier from 23.2 to 11.8, an 11.4 change for the worse.

    We see a lot of the extreme defensive values brought closer to the middle. Inciarte from 11.8 in 2014 to 4.1. Simmons from 22.8 in 2013 to 11.7. Search for Kemp..many of those terrible seasons weren't so terrible after all.

    My biggest issue with UZR was always the crazy outlier seasons it spit out for excellent and terrible players. It looks like now they have finally figured out how to reign in those seasons in question.

  2. #2
    Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is. jpx7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,907
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    47,781
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,442
    Thanked in
    3,830 Posts
    So, what you’re saying is, the Braves should bring back Kemp.
    "For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."

  3. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jpx7 For This Useful Post:

    Prikichi (04-09-2018), Tapate50 (04-09-2018), The Chosen One (04-09-2018), thethe (04-09-2018), thewupk (04-09-2018)

  4. #3
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,061
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,340
    Thanked in
    3,362 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jpx7 View Post
    So, what you’re saying is, the Braves should bring back Kemp.
    As a defensive sub?
    Coppy

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (04-09-2018), Tapate50 (04-09-2018)

  6. #4
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    FG just made a post about how they have improved their defensive metric, UZR. Long story short, they now base hit designations on hang time rather than someone deciding to call it a LD, FB, or GB.

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/inst...nd-uzr-update/

    They then retroactively applied the results all the way back to 2012. This obviously changed some players' defensive ratings...sometimes by a lot. How much? Here's a sample of some of the largest changes from recent seasons:

    2016 Cespedes from -12.1 to -4.0, a 8.2 change for the better.
    2016 Pillar from 21.5 to 12.3, a 9.2 change for the worse.

    2015 Uribe from -1.3 to 6.7, a 8.0 change for the better.
    2015 Kiermaier from 23.2 to 11.8, an 11.4 change for the worse.

    We see a lot of the extreme defensive values brought closer to the middle. Inciarte from 11.8 in 2014 to 4.1. Simmons from 22.8 in 2013 to 11.7. Search for Kemp..many of those terrible seasons weren't so terrible after all.

    My biggest issue with UZR was always the crazy outlier seasons it spit out for excellent and terrible players. It looks like now they have finally figured out how to reign in those seasons in question.
    Overall, my eyeball complaint about WAR was that defense was being over-emphasized.

    My second complaint was how to really credit the wild shifts in defensive values from year to year of players where there was not necessarily any real thesis for decline setting in.

    I guess if this is flattening out defensive outliers on both ends of the spectrum, it might be smoothening out both of my major complaints in effect.



    Would this adjustment to the defensive ratings tend to decrease the defensive contributions to WAR overall? IT seems like if you are pushing the outliers back to the pack that's probably going to be the overall effect.

  7. #5
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,431
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    173
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,579
    Thanked in
    1,044 Posts
    So Coppy was ahead of the game, eh?

  8. #6
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,449
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Overall, my eyeball complaint about WAR was that defense was being over-emphasized.

    My second complaint was how to really credit the wild shifts in defensive values from year to year of players where there was not necessarily any real thesis for decline setting in.

    I guess if this is flattening out defensive outliers on both ends of the spectrum, it might be smoothening out both of my major complaints in effect.



    Would this adjustment to the defensive ratings tend to decrease the defensive contributions to WAR overall? IT seems like if you are pushing the outliers back to the pack that's probably going to be the overall effect.
    It seems to be pushing outliers from both ends to the middle. I imagine it results in a net change of nearly zero, but that’s pure conjecture in my part.

    I still don’t like defensive metrics. The sooner metrics based on Statcast data are publicly available, the better. We need to move past UZR/DRS already. The data is there to do it.

  9. #7
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,511
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,180
    Thanked in
    3,899 Posts
    Defensive metrics are in their infancy. To treat them as the gospel now is a fools errand.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  10. #8
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,810
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,724
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,765
    Thanked in
    5,854 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thethe View Post
    Defensive metrics are in their infancy. To treat them as the gospel now is a fools errand.
    So Albies won't be that 6 WAR player?

  11. #9
    Shift Leader thethe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    69,587
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,511
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,180
    Thanked in
    3,899 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    So Albies won't be that 6 WAR player?
    Just based on the existing metrics.

    Hes a 30 WAR player in my heart.
    Natural Immunity Croc

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to thethe For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (04-09-2018), Managuarantano's Volunteers (04-09-2018), mfree80 (04-09-2018), thewupk (04-09-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Defensive positioning success
    By Coredor in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-24-2019, 01:31 AM
  2. How Are Simmon's Defensive Metrics This Year?
    By CyYoung31 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-27-2015, 09:00 AM
  3. Harang: A Tale of 3 Metrics
    By nsacpi in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 04-20-2014, 09:57 AM
  4. Defensive Numbers So Far
    By thewupk in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-15-2014, 09:24 AM
  5. Simmons not voted best defensive player among coaches.
    By Heyward in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 01:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •