Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 614151617 LastLast
Results 301 to 320 of 324

Thread: GDT -- Wed, 5/23 vs Phiiiies

  1. #301
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DirkPiggler View Post
    Agree, but we haven't reached that point yet.

    Using your reasoning you would've given up on Dale Murphy after 1978. I'm not at all saying Swanson will reach Murph's level of production - just pointing out one example out of many who weren't finished products after fewer than two big league seasons.
    I am not advocating turning Swanson into a bench player. But there is an area between bench player and automatic starter. If we had a third option for the left side of the infield, some sort of rotation could be employed. I think this is the appropriate solution for where Swanson and Camargo are in their careers and for a team that aspires to play in the post-season this year.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  2. #302
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    You don't have to go back that far... look at our previous SS.

    Simmons ops (skipped AAA also BTW)...
    2012 = .751 (kind of a hot start like Swanson)
    2013 = .692
    2014 = .617
    2015 = .660
    2016 = .690
    2017 = .752
    2018 = .857

    Now I realize there is a significant difference in simmons' defense and Swanson's, but Swanson is still very good. I doubt seriously you see Swanson stay under .700 ops again for a season. .700 ops and his defense is a nice asset at ss. I expect Swanson to get better and better with the bat too. I expect Swanson to be our Brandon Crawford
    I think the Brandon Crawford comp is a really good one.

  3. #303
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I am not advocating turning Swanson into a bench player. But there is an area between bench player and automatic starter. If we had a third option for the left side of the infield, some sort of rotation could be employed. I think this is the appropriate solution for where Swanson and Camargo are in their careers and for a team that aspires to play in the post-season this year.
    so the best option is to let neither of them play full-time and thus risk stunting both of their developments?

  4. #304
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    so the best option is to let neither of them play full-time and thus risk stunting both of their developments?
    I don't think having 400-450 PAs this year as opposed to 600-650 will make any difference in their development.

    But having someone like Beltre/Moose/Lowrie to steady our production from the left side of the infield could be quite helpful in the second half and post-season if we get there.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  5. #305
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I would say if their career WAR numbers are a little misleading, then a WAR number for a subset of their career is even more misleading. The data are what they are. After a certain point you have to set aside pedigree.
    a player like camargo having to play full time for an entire season would probably hurt his numbers. but he's never had to do it.

  6. #306
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    I don't think having 400-450 PAs this year as opposed to 600-650 will make any difference in their development.
    not playing every day could.
    look at scott kingery. the phillies move him all over and don't play him every day. i think it's hurting him.
    it's just too early for this. one hot streak and one cold streak and we're having a different conversation.

  7. #307
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    not playing every day could.
    look at scott kingery. the phillies move him all over and don't play him every day. i think it's hurting him.
    it's just too early for this. one hot streak and one cold streak and we're having a different conversation.
    all right let me know when we've had enough at bats from Swanson to draw any conclusions
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  8. #308
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    a player like camargo having to play full time for an entire season would probably hurt his numbers. but he's never had to do it.
    yup...and with Kingery its the opposite...i guess everyone is different
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  9. #309
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    37,684
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,325
    Thanked in
    3,701 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    all right let me know when we've had enough at bats from Swanson to draw any conclusions
    What were your conclusions about Simmons as a hitter his first 1.5 seasons?

  10. #310
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    239 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    What were your conclusions about Simmons as a hitter his first 1.5 seasons?
    The issue in comping with Simmons here is Simmons had a VERY low K% and his problem was he liked contact too much.
    Aggression with prospects is fine, but being stupid is not. There should be a way to find a happy medium between a Pirates like idea of being overly cautious with prospects and going stupidly fast with prospects.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to GeorgiaGirl For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (05-24-2018)

  12. #311
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    37,684
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,325
    Thanked in
    3,701 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaGirl View Post
    The issue in comping with Simmons here is Simmons had a VERY low K% and his problem was he liked contact too much.
    Fair enough... point is hitters aren't always a finished product at 24

  13. #312
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    What were your conclusions about Simmons as a hitter his first 1.5 seasons?
    one thing that I always wondered about Simmons was the low BABIP for a player with obvious outstanding hand-eye coordination and very low strikeout rate....i know he had the issue with pop ups...but it seemed to me at the time that his BABIP numbers would improve...i thought this even after multiple seasons of low BABIPs. It seemed reasonable to me to think it would normalize to somewhere around .280 rather than stick to the very low numbers he had (.247 and .263 in his first two full seasons). Of course this year's .335 BABIP is not sustainable either, but there was always the potential out there for him to have this kind of year
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  14. #313
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Fair enough... point is hitters aren't always a finished product at 24
    a lot of players improve at that age but others dont...it concerns me that his strikeout rate is going in the wrong direction

    Camargo on the other hand has improved his walk and strikeout rates (small sample caveat applies)
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  15. #314
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    all right let me know when we've had enough at bats from Swanson to draw any conclusions
    will do. it's certainly not in his 2nd full season.

  16. #315
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    yup...and with Kingery its the opposite...i guess everyone is different
    difference is camargo playing favorable match ups and riding a SSS BABIP to a good WAR. last season he had a 65 wRC+ as a lefty vs RHP. perhaps if he played every day vs RHP his numbers wouldn't have been nearly as good. or, most definitely would not have been.

  17. #316
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Neither Camargo nor Swanson has established themselves as players you want to have in the lineup every day.
    Nope, but Swanson has established himself as a MLB quality SS defensively. Camargo hasn't even done that.

    If Camargo ends up being "the guy" at SS, the Braves are probably in a bit of trouble.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    gcbraves (05-24-2018), jpx7 (05-24-2018), striker42 (05-24-2018)

  19. #317
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    I feel like it may have more to do with this board's intense (and just) hatred of the Phillies. lol
    I hate looking at their stupid uniforms.

  20. #318
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    a lot of players improve at that age but others dont...it concerns me that his strikeout rate is going in the wrong direction

    Camargo on the other hand has improved his walk and strikeout rates (small sample caveat applies)
    Camargo’s walk rate is absurdly high compared to anything he’s ever done before. That’s a good bet to crater. Especially if he continues hitting .200.

    On the other hand Dansby is showing signs he might never deal with sliders particularly well.

  21. #319
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Camargo’s walk rate is absurdly high compared to anything he’s ever done before. That’s a good bet to crater. Especially if he continues hitting .200.

    On the other hand Dansby is showing signs he might never deal with sliders particularly well.
    I dont expect Camargo's walk rate to remain this high...but it does seem his control of the strike zone is improving
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  22. #320
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,490
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,032
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,024
    Thanked in
    5,508 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I hate looking at their stupid uniforms.
    I’ve always liked their uniforms. Simple and classic.

Similar Threads

  1. Clinch day(?) Sat vs Phiiiies, game 3
    By salmagundy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 289
    Last Post: 09-23-2018, 04:44 PM
  2. GDT -- Mon 5/21 vs Phiiiies
    By salmagundy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 180
    Last Post: 05-22-2018, 07:49 AM
  3. GDT 4/18/18 vs Phiiiies
    By thethe in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 253
    Last Post: 04-19-2018, 05:20 AM
  4. GDT 4/17/18 vs Phiiiies
    By salmagundy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 310
    Last Post: 04-18-2018, 11:59 AM
  5. OD GDT 3/229 vs Phiiiies
    By salmagundy in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-29-2018, 12:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •