Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 181 to 193 of 193

Thread: GDT: 6/5 Braves at Padres

  1. #181
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    Some regression for Sean is likely but his current profile, imo, will lead to a low homerun rate.
    probably not all-time low, however

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Super For This Useful Post:

    Garmel (06-06-2018)

  3. #182
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,860
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,728
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,776
    Thanked in
    5,863 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    probably not all-time low, however
    Certainly not. But I think it will be a healthy amount below 1 HR/9. Assuming he can keep his walks where they are I see a mid to high 3 FIP from him.

  4. #183
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    239 Posts
    Here's Sean Newcomb's statcast page:

    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savan...r-pitching-mlb
    Aggression with prospects is fine, but being stupid is not. There should be a way to find a happy medium between a Pirates like idea of being overly cautious with prospects and going stupidly fast with prospects.

  5. #184
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,640
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts

  6. #185
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    This is true. His average exit velocity on FB/LD is the 6th lowest in baseball among starters. Couple that with the fact he's getting a true fly ball % of 22.8% you can see why he's not giving up many homeruns.

    Compare that to Julio who's true fly ball rate is 32.6% and 28th highest exit velocity on LD/FB and his homerun totals are really high.

    The exit velocity and angle (fly ball, etc) against Newk really shows up in the barrels against stat. Barrels is a term to defined a great launch angle with great exit velocity. These are batted ball events where hitters just crush it. Newks Barrels per batted ball event against is only 2.8%. That's the 2nd best among starters this year.

    Some regression for Sean is likely but his current profile, imo, will lead to a low homerun rate.
    This is absolutely true.

    Newk has the profile of a guy who is projected to allow 0.8-1.0 HR/9 due to his high K rate and plus curve generating tons of GBs.

    Folty, on the other hand, doesn't generate many GBs, and that leads to him being projected for a HR/9 of 1.2+.

    Both are sitting around half their expected HR/9...and it is simply not sustainable. Newk's rate especially unsustainable.

    Why does that matter? Because at the trade deadline the Braves are going to have to decide how many future wins they want to convert into present wins to push for a playoff run. In order to do that, they will need to accurately project their chances going forward.

    The Braves aren't going to make decisions based on Albies HR/FB rate being 20%+, and they aren't going to make those projections based on Newk's HR/FB rate being 4.9%. They are going to normalize those numbers and make accurate projections.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 06-06-2018 at 12:42 PM.

  7. #186
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    enscheff, what are using to say Ks typically go down for pitchers at this point? looking at just the top 30 pitchers in WAR on FG, a lot (majority?) of them had k-rate spikes after a few seasons in the league.

  8. #187
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    enscheff, what are using to say Ks typically go down for pitchers at this point? looking at just the top 30 pitchers in WAR on FG, a lot (majority?) of them had k-rate spikes after a few seasons in the league.
    The best pitchers are the best pitchers because their K rates went up. That doesn't mean it's common for that to happen.

    Here is the best article I've seen on pitcher aging curves. I actually have it bookmarked:

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/pitc...and-relievers/

    TLDR:

    Velocity decreases immediately, but K/9 stays flat until the mid-20s due to improved control (using BB/9 as a proxy). This push/pull between velocity declining and control improving keeps FIP flat-ish until the late 20s. By the time a SP get into his late 20s, it's time to unload him...aka the Rays model.
    Last edited by Enscheff; 06-06-2018 at 12:13 PM.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (06-06-2018), Super (06-06-2018)

  10. #188
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,860
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,728
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,776
    Thanked in
    5,863 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Velocity decreases immediately, but K/9 stays flat until the mid-20s due to improved control (using BB/9 as a proxy). This push/pull between velocity declining and control improving keeps FIP flat-ish until the late 20s. By the time a SP get into his late 20s, it's time to unload him...aka the Rays model.
    see Julio Teheran

  11. #189
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,111
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,350
    Thanked in
    3,370 Posts
    Has anyone noticed Newks fastball is different speeds. Last night the gun was showing 89 to 95 but living mostly in the 91 to 94ish range. Wonder if he is taking some off to work on control.
    Coppy

  12. #190
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,059
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    234
    Thanked in
    154 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    Has anyone noticed Newks fastball is different speeds. Last night the gun was showing 89 to 95 but living mostly in the 91 to 94ish range. Wonder if he is taking some off to work on control.
    I noticed that too and I think he took some off once they got the 8 run lead. I think he was trying not to walk anyone.

  13. #191
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,500
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    Has anyone noticed Newks fastball is different speeds. Last night the gun was showing 89 to 95 but living mostly in the 91 to 94ish range. Wonder if he is taking some off to work on control.
    I've seen Newk toss them up there feeling for strikes. Not a fan of that tactic, at all.

    Learn to repeat at 93 rather than varying speeds for control...which is probably counterproductive.

  14. #192
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    How do we know his K rate won't go back up? If that happens, doesn't it offset some of the regression?
    Honestly, I agree with the underlying message that Newcomb is going to regress.

    The tone seems fairly dire, but it's not that big a deal unless you thought Newcomb and Folty were both #1 lock down aces.

    I don't see any particular reason why the decline in his K rate over two months is necessarily determinative. It would seem entirely possible for it to pop back up with more of a sample. Unless their is a physical issue driving it, but I don't know why we would conclude that.

    Personally, I think given Newcomb's control problems that his pitching more to contact isn't such a bad thing. May well let him stay deeper into games, given his weak contact rates.

    While that may spike his results somewhat, it may well be better for the team to trade that off for longer outings. Don't know, depends on how you feel about the depth of the Braves pen.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Southcack77 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (06-06-2018)

  16. #193
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    2,198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    287
    Thanked in
    239 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    Honestly, I agree with the underlying message that Newcomb is going to regress.

    The tone seems fairly dire, but it's not that big a deal unless you thought Newcomb and Folty were both #1 lock down aces.

    I don't see any particular reason why the decline in his K rate over two months is necessarily determinative. It would seem entirely possible for it to pop back up with more of a sample. Unless their is a physical issue driving it, but I don't know why we would conclude that.

    Personally, I think given Newcomb's control problems that his pitching more to contact isn't such a bad thing. May well let him stay deeper into games, given his weak contact rates.

    While that may spike his results somewhat, it may well be better for the team to trade that off for longer outings. Don't know, depends on how you feel about the depth of the Braves pen.
    With predictive stats/sabermetrics, I'd rather not just use 1 stat. That's my only case here. I'd rather use the whole deal.

    Yes Newcomb is getting lucky. No, it's not dire right now if you use the whole shebang of stuff available to you and xwOBA and xSLG off pitchers is available. Both are minimal differences. Yes he likely shouldn't be allowing so few HR, but his xSLG is like .302. That's not far from the actual SLG off him.
    Aggression with prospects is fine, but being stupid is not. There should be a way to find a happy medium between a Pirates like idea of being overly cautious with prospects and going stupidly fast with prospects.

Similar Threads

  1. GDT: Padres @ Braves 5/1 Mayday?
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 197
    Last Post: 05-02-2019, 10:31 AM
  2. GDT: Padres at Braves 6/15/18
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 213
    Last Post: 06-16-2018, 08:57 AM
  3. GDT: 6/6 Braves at Padres
    By Garmel in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: 06-08-2018, 02:29 PM
  4. 8/30 Padres @ Braves
    By Garmel in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-31-2016, 12:20 PM
  5. GDT: 8/1/14...10:10 PM EST...Braves (No Heyward) vs. Padres
    By jsebe10 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 290
    Last Post: 08-02-2014, 12:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •