Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 59

Thread: The Adam Duv-awful Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts

    The Adam Duv-awful Thread

    Duvall is now 4 for 40 as a Brave. That's a .100 BA. But at least he's also shown no power (all 4 hits have been singles), poor plate discipline (just 3 BBs), and atrocious defense.

    Seriously, how long can we keep this guy around? He's a marginal player when he's not actively giving games away. Right now he's absolutely killing us.

  2. #2
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    37,747
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,330
    Thanked in
    3,704 Posts
    Got control doe

  3. #3
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,494
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    It was always questionable to pay extra for Duvall just because he had extra control. Paying retail for role players under control seems like a poor use of resources. That was my beef with the move, even though it was an overall solid acquisition.

    There's no reason to dump him since he's cheap and there's plenty of room on the roster, but he has likely moved way down the PH pecking order. Now that the Braves have 3 catchers on the roster, expect to see Flowers, Suzuki and Culberson to get the bulk of the PH appearances vs LHP.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (09-06-2018), jpx7 (09-06-2018)

  5. #4
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    It was always questionable to pay extra for Duvall just because he had extra control. Paying retail for role players under control seems like a poor use of resources. That was my beef with the move, even though it was an overall solid acquisition.

    There's no reason to dump him since he's cheap and there's plenty of room on the roster, but he has likely moved way down the PH pecking order. Now that the Braves have 3 catchers on the roster, expect to see Flowers, Suzuki and Culberson to get the bulk of the PH appearances vs LHP.
    Results aside, was Lucas Sims really paying full price for Duvall?

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to mqt For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-06-2018)

  7. #5
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,494
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,032
    Thanked in
    6,135 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mqt View Post
    Results aside, was Lucas Sims really paying full price for Duvall?
    You know the cost wasn't just Sims, and you know Sims, Wisler and Tucker all had some value, just like Duvall did.

    I would have rather seen the Braves get a rental RHH for Sims or wisler...or a LHH earlier for some of that package.

    In the end the issue isn't the cost. The issue is the process AA used. That process entailed paying for extra control over a role player, and that is a faulty process because role players are easy to acquire at any time.

    Now we are seeing just how little value control over a role player is when Duvall becomes a non-tender candidate.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    striker42 (09-06-2018)

  9. #6
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,626
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,328
    Thanked in
    853 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    You know the cost wasn't just Sims, and you know Sims, Wisler and Tucker all had some value, just like Duvall did.

    I would have rather seen the Braves get a rental RHH for Sims or wisler...or a LHH earlier for some of that package.

    In the end the issue isn't the cost. The issue is the process AA used. That process entailed paying for extra control over a role player, and that is a faulty process because role players are easy to acquire at any time.

    Now we are seeing just how little value control over a role player is when Duvall becomes a non-tender candidate.
    I’d venture that Wisler was well on his way to exiting the organization, and we already bought Tucker back, so it’s not like he had much value. I just don’t see any scenario in which we would have found a rental whose price was tangibly lower than Duvall’s.

  10. #7
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    You know the cost wasn't just Sims, and you know Sims, Wisler and Tucker all had some value, just like Duvall did.

    I would have rather seen the Braves get a rental RHH for Sims or wisler...or a LHH earlier for some of that package.

    In the end the issue isn't the cost. The issue is the process AA used. That process entailed paying for extra control over a role player, and that is a faulty process because role players are easy to acquire at any time.

    Now we are seeing just how little value control over a role player is when Duvall becomes a non-tender candidate.
    This. Duvall was an almost 30 year old role player who already was clearly in decline. Future control meant nothing.

    I think the Braves also might have gotten a bit caught up in who Duvall was before this year and not what Duvall is now. A 27 year old Duvall in his prime is an entirely different animal than a 30 year old Duvall rapidly heading towards being a minor leaguer again.

  11. #8
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    It was always questionable to pay extra for Duvall just because he had extra control. Paying retail for role players under control seems like a poor use of resources. That was my beef with the move, even though it was an overall solid acquisition.

    There's no reason to dump him since he's cheap and there's plenty of room on the roster, but he has likely moved way down the PH pecking order. Now that the Braves have 3 catchers on the roster, expect to see Flowers, Suzuki and Culberson to get the bulk of the PH appearances vs LHP.
    Duvall has to be nontendered this offseason. There's no reason to expend any resources on him next season.

    Also, I'm not sure he has moved himself down. A rational manager would let him rot on the bench but that's not what we have.

  12. #9
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,477
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,099
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,713
    Thanked in
    3,899 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    Duvall has to be nontendered this offseason. There's no reason to expend any resources on him next season.

    Also, I'm not sure he has moved himself down. A rational manager would let him rot on the bench but that's not what we have.
    Non tendering him seems to be the best way to guarantee he makes the All star game next season
    Ivermectin Man

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tapate50 For This Useful Post:

    50PoundHead (09-06-2018), JohnAdcox (09-06-2018), jpx7 (09-06-2018)

  14. #10
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,503
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,409
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,763
    Thanked in
    1,990 Posts
    Yeah, he'll be somewhere near 2 million next year. Really doubt he is non-tendered.

    Hopefully it's just a mechanical flaw they can be fixed. Wonder if he has a brother-in-law we could get on the team somehow?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (09-06-2018)

  16. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    23,459
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,930
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,639
    Thanked in
    1,992 Posts
    I definitely think he's back next year. He's been woeful with Atlanta, but I think he could be a very valuable piece on next year's bench. Going from starting (where he was struggling) to hitting on a nearly pinch-hit basis isn't easy.

  17. #12
    Hessmania Forever
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,897
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,705
    Thanked in
    4,965 Posts
    Duvall falls into the category of players who has to play every day to have a chance at being good, but may not be good enough to play every day (you following?). The thing that has saved him in the past somewhat is that he appeared to be able to play decent defense. He just hasn't been good here, but it likely hasn't been easy for him to adjust to an extreme part-time role after playing pretty much every day in Cincinnati.

    I don't know whether he will be back or not. They first have to make a decision on Markakis before moving to second tier decisions.

  18. #13
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Duvall's hitting struggles could maybe be understandable. He's adjusting to not playing every day, he's on a contender for the first time, he's probably had some bad BABIP luck, etc. But a few things still puzzle me.

    First is his power outage. Even if he's getting unlucky with balls hit at fielders, he should still have driven a couple out of the park by now. His 4 hits have all been singles. The eye test hasn't been kind to him either. From what I've seen of his ABs, he's not really driving the ball at all. Lots of lazy fly balls.

    Second, his defense has been putrid. Yesterday was a great example.

    Honestly, Duvall has probably cost us 2 games with his play and he hasn't even played that much. I'm hoping he'll rebound and be the player he was for the Reds but the more he struggles the more we might be watching a Dan Uggla-like collapse of a player.

  19. #14
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    774
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,702
    Thanked in
    1,993 Posts
    Just because Duvall has been awful for us since his arrival doesn't mean he's an awful player. The initial consensus was that this was a solid trade given his career numbers, including the experts. A whole lot of hindsight heroes in this thread right now. I have a hard time saying a player should be non-tendered based on 40 at-bats.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    Chico (09-06-2018), jpx7 (09-06-2018), UNCBlue012 (09-06-2018)

  21. #15
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Just because Duvall has been awful for us since his arrival doesn't mean he's an awful player. The initial consensus was that this was a solid trade given his career numbers, including the experts. A whole lot of hindsight heroes in this thread right now. I have a hard time saying a player should be non-tendered based on 40 at-bats.
    I thought it was an okay add when we made it. I thought Wisler and Sims had more talent than some were giving them credit for so I don't think it was a steal, but I thought Duvall could add some power.

    I also thought Uggla was going to be a great add and he ended up collapsing immediately. Duvall just turned 30 and has never been what you would call a complete player. It's entirely possible that his tools have started eroding and, with him already having deep flaws as a hitter, he's experienced a complete collapse.

    The thing that really concerns me is that his numbers aren't just terrible, he looks absolutely AWFUL out there. He's not spraying bullets all over the field. He's having bad ABs and making weak outs.

    If Duvall continues to show nothing at the plate and especially if he keeps screwing up in the field, I don't even feel comfortable putting $2 million into him for next year.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    Super (09-06-2018)

  23. #16
    Approaching Buddy Hernandez Territory
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    959
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    189
    Thanked in
    149 Posts
    He's been trash but my biggest fear is after we let Neck go in free agency like we should, of him being in a platoon in left to start the season.I think we all hope/wish that we spend on a good corner outfielder or 3rd baseman but what happens if the Braves don't spend?
    Unfortunately I think that's when we see Duval on opening day in left...

  24. #17
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    He has been horrible of course, but he could also get hot at any time and make us forget.

    Remember how absolutely horrible Culberson was the first month of the season.

  25. #18
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,658
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,205
    Thanked in
    2,052 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBravos View Post
    He has been horrible of course, but he could also get hot at any time and make us forget.

    Remember how absolutely horrible Culberson was the first month of the season.
    Problem is that Duvall is now below the Mendoza line for the year. His hit tool has always been marginal but it looks like its eroded to pitcher level now. I think that's eating into his power production as well. It's hard to drive balls out of the park when you're not barreling many up.

    It's likely we've seen the last of Duvall as a useful major leaguer.

  26. #19
    It's OVER 5,000! Braves1976's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    15,027
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7,679
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,207
    Thanked in
    1,642 Posts
    wow this thread is a joke, even this about his defense costing us games is nonsense. He is obviously having issues not playing much as he'd been use to doing, and has been slumping. As far as his power goes, his drive in Miami not long ago would be out of most ballparks. That was almost a big homerun. He even had another drive well gone that was so close they thought it might have hit the pole. So the power is still there, just a small sample and things not falling his way.

  27. #20
    I <3 Ron Paul + gilesfan sturg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    52,863
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,018
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,132
    Thanked in
    5,788 Posts

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to sturg33 For This Useful Post:

    UNCBlue012 (09-07-2018)

Similar Threads

  1. Adam Duvall Apology Thread
    By striker42 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-07-2019, 06:46 AM
  2. YNOT Braves for DBacks SCORES - Awful Display
    By AerchAngel in forum The Fredi Archives
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-19-2018, 09:54 AM
  3. YNOT Braves for DBacks SCORES - Awful Display
    By AerchAngel in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-19-2018, 09:54 AM
  4. 9/10 GDT: Mets vs Braves awful bullpen
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-10-2016, 11:11 PM
  5. MINORS THREAD 6/2: Two prospects in awful slumps.
    By rico43 in forum Rico's Reports 2014
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-03-2014, 07:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •