Page 129 of 579 FirstFirst ... 2979119127128129130131139179229 ... LastLast
Results 2,561 to 2,580 of 11579

Thread: 2018 Offseason And Targets

  1. #2561
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The Ms are so dumb they are being used by the Mets and Phils to unload stupid contracts. The Ms are so dumb they are rebuilding by taking on money while taking in very little future talent

    Dipoto is gonna Dipoto, and the Ms are gonna be bad for a looooong time.

    It would be nice to see AA strike here.
    I'm not sure how the clear Seagar from the payroll without tagging him to Haniger.

    But maybe they could come out of this with JP Crawford, Kelenic, and two other top 100 guys, and have a pristine payroll after 2020. That's about as good as it could work out at this point, isn't it?

  2. #2562
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    That's about as good as it could work out at this point, isn't it?
    no?
    they could get better value for segura. good player on a good contract. they're taking JP crawford back as the main piece while also taking on santana? that's an awful move. i have to believe segura alone is worth way more than crawford. crawford + santana? yikes. why take on that salary if the best piece you're getting is JPC?
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  3. #2563
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,470
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,027
    Thanked in
    6,130 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I'm not sure how the clear Seagar from the payroll without tagging him to Haniger.

    But maybe they could come out of this with JP Crawford, Kelenic, and two other top 100 guys, and have a pristine payroll after 2020. That's about as good as it could work out at this point, isn't it?
    Sheffield too.

    The issue appears to be their desire to spend again in 2 years rather than bite the bullet and rebuild for 4+ years.

  4. #2564
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I follow him. IF the Ms pay half his salary, he'll be easy to flip.

    Seagar at 9-10m probably would interest a fair number of clubs.
    Don't forget that Seager's 2022 option will vest if he is traded. He may not be as easy to flip as you think, especially if he continues to underperform.

  5. #2565
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    The Ms are so dumb they are being used by the Mets and Phils to unload stupid contracts. The Ms are so dumb they are rebuilding by taking on money while taking in very little future talent

    Dipoto is gonna Dipoto, and the Ms are gonna be bad for a looooong time.

    It would be nice to see AA strike here.
    I honestly can't believe how much future value Dipoto is leaving on the table in these deals. If the reported deal is correct and Crawford/Santana are the only major pieces headed back to SEA, then this is an epic fleecing by the Phillies. He might be the worst GM in baseball.

  6. #2566
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I'm not sure how the clear Seagar from the payroll without tagging him to Haniger.

    But maybe they could come out of this with JP Crawford, Kelenic, and two other top 100 guys, and have a pristine payroll after 2020. That's about as good as it could work out at this point, isn't it?
    Their best move would be to take on as much prospect capital at this point. Instead, as Enscheff pointed out, they are trying to move money so they can spend again in 2 years, but I don't see any way that they'll be competitive enough for it to make sense for them. If they would have focused on selling for maximum prospect capital, they could turned the worst farm in baseball into one of the best farms in baseball really quickly with all the assets they had.

    They are making the mistake of not diving head first into a rebuild. Instead they are just trying to move money around while still trying to put a semi-competitive ballclub on the field. Usually that mindset is fatal for a franchise. I don't see the M's being competitive for a long long time.

  7. #2567
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,084
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,343
    Thanked in
    3,365 Posts
    There is reports of another bad contract going to the phils. But nothing major. This trade doesn’t make sense to the point I am not buying it until done. Seattle has no clue what they are doing or want to do. Does dumbpotto think this team can win in 2 years.
    Coppy

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to bravesfanMatt For This Useful Post:

    Champman33 (12-03-2018)

  9. #2568
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    There is reports of another bad contract going to the phils. But nothing major. This trade doesn’t make sense to the point I am not buying it until done. Seattle has no clue what they are doing or want to do. Does dumbpotto think this team can win in 2 years.
    It sounds like they are flipping Swarzak to the Phillies. This deal still doesn't make any damn sense to me. I can't believe how bad Dipoto is at this trading thing. You'd think that he has done it enough to learn some lessons. Apparently he hasn't learned anything.

  10. #2569
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,575
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,389
    Thanked in
    7,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    It sounds like they are flipping Swarzak to the Phillies. This deal still doesn't make any damn sense to me. I can't believe how bad Dipoto is at this trading thing. You'd think that he has done it enough to learn some lessons. Apparently he hasn't learned anything.
    My take is that all three of the big deals the M's have made this off-season are close to fair trades. I don't think anyone got taken to the cleaners on these trades.

    The main plan seems to be to clear the decks of financial dead weight so the team can compete again in 2020 or more likely 2021.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  11. #2570
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,084
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,859
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,343
    Thanked in
    3,365 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    My take is that all three of the big deals the M's have made this off-season are close to fair trades. I don't think anyone got taken to the cleaners on these trades.

    The main plan seems to be to clear the decks of financial dead weight so the team can compete again in 2020 or more likely 2021.
    So they will buy a team in 2021.
    Coppy

  12. #2571
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    My take is that all three of the big deals the M's have made this off-season are close to fair trades. I don't think anyone got taken to the cleaners on these trades.

    The main plan seems to be to clear the decks of financial dead weight so the team can compete again in 2020 or more likely 2021.
    you don't think santana + crawford for segura + swarzak is a fleecing?
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  13. #2572
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,575
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,389
    Thanked in
    7,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    So they will buy a team in 2021.
    They are engaged in something similar to what we did with the Matt Kemp trade to the Dodgers. But on a larger scale.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  14. #2573
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,575
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,389
    Thanked in
    7,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    you don't think santana + crawford for segura + swarzak is a fleecing?
    Nope. My estimates for expected surplus value has Segura at +5 wins, Crawford at +4 and Santana at +1. Swarzak I have at -1. So the deal is slightly favorable for the M's if Swarzak is included.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  15. #2574
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    My take is that all three of the big deals the M's have made this off-season are close to fair trades. I don't think anyone got taken to the cleaners on these trades.

    The main plan seems to be to clear the decks of financial dead weight so the team can compete again in 2020 or more likely 2021.
    I think he got about 75% of Paxton's value, the Mets deal was pretty fair, and he is heading towards losing some value in this Segura trade if the structure is as reported.

    The problem with the Mets deal wasn't the value, it was how he decided to get that value. He decided to dump Cano's contract and shift money onto '19 and '20 instead of maximizing the prospect return he got back. And you're right, he did do that with an eye towards competing in the next couple of years. I think that was a mistake. That Seattle team should have approached this as a complete teardown and done what it could to maximize the prospect capital they got back. But I think their impatience is going to keep them from being truly competitive for a long time.

    Plus, I think that they could have moved Cano without having to attach Diaz to him. I think they could have found a team willing to trade two bad contracts in '19 and '20 and have Seattle kick in ~30-40 million instead of the 20 they sent to the Mets. Maybe they would have also had to attach a B or C prospect to that deal as well. Or maybe they could have attached Segura instead. But instead of that they attached Diaz who I thought was their most valuable asset (maybe Haniger).

    If they traded Diaz by himself, I think they could have fetched an absolute haul from some team. Especially if the recent reliever market is any indication.

  16. #2575
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,780
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    I think he got about 75% of Paxton's value, the Mets deal was pretty fair, and he is heading towards losing some value in this Segura trade if the structure is as reported.

    The problem with the Mets deal wasn't the value, it was how he decided to get that value. He decided to dump Cano's contract and shift money onto '19 and '20 instead of maximizing the prospect return he got back. And you're right, he did do that with an eye towards competing in the next couple of years. I think that was a mistake. That Seattle team should have approached this as a complete teardown and done what it could to maximize the prospect capital they got back. But I think their impatience is going to keep them from being truly competitive for a long time.

    Plus, I think that they could have moved Cano without having to attach Diaz to him. I think they could have found a team willing to trade two bad contracts in '19 and '20 and have Seattle kick in ~30-40 million instead of the 20 they sent to the Mets. Maybe they would have also had to attach a B or C prospect to that deal as well. Or maybe they could have attached Segura instead. But instead of that they attached Diaz who I thought was their most valuable asset (maybe Haniger).

    If they traded Diaz by himself, I think they could have fetched an absolute haul from some team. Especially if the recent reliever market is any indication.

    I just don't think a complete tear down is the answer to every problem.

  17. #2576
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Nope. My estimates for expected surplus value has Segura at +5 wins, Crawford at +4 and Santana at +1. Swarzak I have at -1. So the deal is slightly favorable for the M's if Swarzak is included.
    Right, the value might be right but the M's are allocating all of that value onto their MLB squad instead of deferring it to the future. I think that is going to be a fatal mistake for them long term. I'm of the opinion that you can't rush a rebuild and that is exactly what the Mariners are doing. They don't want to be patient.

  18. #2577
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,575
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,389
    Thanked in
    7,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    I think he got about 75% of Paxton's value, the Mets deal was pretty fair, and he is heading towards losing some value in this Segura trade if the structure is as reported.

    The problem with the Mets deal wasn't the value, it was how he decided to get that value. He decided to dump Cano's contract and shift money onto '19 and '20 instead of maximizing the prospect return he got back. And you're right, he did do that with an eye towards competing in the next couple of years. I think that was a mistake. That Seattle team should have approached this as a complete teardown and done what it could to maximize the prospect capital they got back. But I think their impatience is going to keep them from being truly competitive for a long time.

    Plus, I think that they could have moved Cano without having to attach Diaz to him. I think they could have found a team willing to trade two bad contracts in '19 and '20 and have Seattle kick in ~30-40 million instead of the 20 they sent to the Mets. Maybe they would have also had to attach a B or C prospect to that deal as well. Or maybe they could have attached Segura instead. But instead of that they attached Diaz who I thought was their most valuable asset (maybe Haniger).

    If they traded Diaz by himself, I think they could have fetched an absolute haul from some team. Especially if the recent reliever market is any indication.
    From a big picture strategic point of view you could argue that a complete teardown makes more sense.

    But looking at value for value, I think the individual deals come close to being fair. And in terms of temporal rearrangement of wins, they have clearly moved wins from the 2019-2020 timeframe to wins further into the future.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  19. #2578
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I just don't think a complete tear down is the answer to every problem.
    Neither do I, but that was the best answer to the Mariner's problems. If you are going to rebuild, I think you have to go into it 100%. If you try to speed it up or if you try to remain competitive while you "re-tool", usually it ends poorly long term.

    I just don't see any path to competitiveness with this currently assembled core for the Mariners. Maybe they'll have enough money in 2021 to buy their way back in, but I don't see it.

  20. #2579
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Nope. My estimates for expected surplus value has Segura at +5 wins, Crawford at +4 and Santana at +1. Swarzak I have at -1. So the deal is slightly favorable for the M's if Swarzak is included.
    that seems extremely generous for crawford.
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  21. #2580
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I just don't think a complete tear down is the answer to every problem.
    the mariners farm system still isn't good and they've unloaded some valuable pieces.
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

Similar Threads

  1. Around the League: 2017 offseason edition / 2018 Season
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 2322
    Last Post: 10-31-2018, 12:15 PM
  2. Around the League: 2018/2019 Offseason
    By bravesfanforlife88 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2018, 05:44 PM
  3. Discussion of Braves 2018 Offseason plans
    By Horsehide Harry in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 1144
    Last Post: 03-05-2018, 10:31 PM
  4. Potential 2016 Offseason Targets
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 166
    Last Post: 10-08-2016, 02:37 AM
  5. 2018 Offseason
    By thewupk in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-28-2016, 07:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •