"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
That is true, although I disagree on the Paxton deal. But the Mariners have reallocated wins to the 2021 season and beyond. But I think that was too soon and they spent too many resources on MLB ready assets. I hate it when rebuilding teams take on MLB ready assets at the start of a rebuild. From a pure value standpoint, you are guaranteeing that you'll waste a good portion of their value in non-competitive seasons.
I also don't view them taking Santana as them taking an asset. If anything, they are doing the Phillies a huge favor and not making them pay for it (as reported). The Phillies were relatively desperate to get rid of him and if the Mariners value him as a +1 asset then they are basically giving away potential leverage. If he weren't included in this deal and the Phillies still had to move Santana, I bet they would be willing to attach some value or send money to get him off the books. The fact that the Mariners are ostensibly taking him on as an asset at the onset of a rebuild is just.... its mind boggling.
This. Crawford was disappointing to be kind.
And the M’s don’t have a good farm. So they are going to have to hope these prospects pan out. And that no one gets hurt. And that no one regresses. And then still fill a lot of holes via FA. That won’t happen. They have put themselves in a purgatory that they will be stuck in for years now. And a new GM will have to clean this mess up.
Coppy
Last edited by nsacpi; 12-03-2018 at 03:01 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
I think valuing highly rated prospects who have a disappointing first year is a fairly tricky proposition. There are lots of players who go on to be productive after that disappointing first season in the majors. Valuing Crawford as a 1-1.5 win per season player over the next five years seems pretty reasonable to me.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."
Maybe something like that will work out, but generally I'm not a fan of the idea of acquiring an asset with the thought of flipping them later for more assets. You're betting on a lot of things going right for you, especially when you consider Santana is a 1st baseman.
You'd be betting on Santana returning to 2016 levels of production and you'd be betting that a competitive team would be in need of a first baseman at the deadline. I think I'd rather just have the prospect from the initial trade lol.
Valuating Crawford runs in to the similar problem that we run into with Dansby or Newcomb. Nobody really knows how to value them properly. I think your Crawford valuation is pretty fair. I think you might be a tad low on Segura though. I have him at about 60 million in surplus value, but that isn't too far off yours.
The M's didn't kill it. But picking up Kelenic, Sheffield and Crawford is not bad.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."