Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 41

Thread: Greinke plus Peralta

  1. #21
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    431
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    577
    Thanked in
    376 Posts
    I think a Grinke deal has more legs than any other I've seen. AA has acted as a capitalist in the past with teams looking to shed payroll and he loves the contract swaps. Also, Grienke has a limited no trade blocking 15 teams. I doubt the Braves are on that list.

    AA could really be in the driver's seat as one of the few teams who aren't blocked by the no trade and are able to take on salary.

    Peralta coming back would be a must as it would fill the corner OF job. Lamb or Bradley could be involved as welll. Julio or Oday could be involved on our end for salary purposes.

  2. #22
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Orlando,FL
    Posts
    8,378
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,017
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,355
    Thanked in
    1,493 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chico View Post
    I think a Grinke deal has more legs than any other I've seen. AA has acted as a capitalist in the past with teams looking to shed payroll and he loves the contract swaps. Also, Grienke has a limited no trade blocking 15 teams. I doubt the Braves are on that list.

    AA could really be in the driver's seat as one of the few teams who aren't blocked by the no trade and are able to take on salary.

    Peralta coming back would be a must as it would fill the corner OF job. Lamb or Bradley could be involved as welll. Julio or Oday could be involved on our end for salary purposes.
    The more you think of it, the more it makes sense....last year we did the contract swaps of Kemp for McCarthy, Gonzalez, and Kazmir....McCarthy actually turned out to be big for us early in the season along with Culberson... Greinke could be a big add for us at the top of the rotation....

    Greinke, Bradley, and Peralta would be a big haul for us. Then sign Grandal.

    Inciarte CF
    Acuna LF
    Freeman 1B
    Peralta RF
    Camargo 3B
    Grandal C
    Albies 2B
    Swanson SS

    Culberson
    Flowers
    Duvall

    Greinke
    Folty
    Gausman
    Newk (if not in the Greinke deal)
    Soroka,Wilson.Touki,Freid, Gohara fight it out for the last 1 or 2 spots.

    Bradley
    Viz
    Minter
    Sobotka
    Venters
    Biddle
    Carle
    O'Day
    Winkler

    I don't like that we did not upgrade the bench. But the BP should be better, the rotation got better, we got better at C and cOF.
    Last edited by bravesfanforlife88; 11-16-2018 at 12:18 PM.
    Get off my lawn!

  3. #23
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,455
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    I agree that the Braves almost certainly wouldn't take on Greinke's entire contract. I'm not sure how much the DBacks would have to take on, but I going to assume it would be enough to facilitate the Braves adding Ramos/Grandal.

    If we assume:

    - the Braves 2019 opening day payroll will be $120M-$125M
    - the Braves already have ~$82M of that accounted for
    - the Braves need $20M in 2019 for C, bench and BP additions
    - the proposed Greinke/Peralta package has a total surplus value of ~$25M
    - the combined 2019 salary for Greinke/Peralta is $42M

    That puts the Braves right at $125M, and essentially no room to add a C or anything else.

    To make it work, the DBacks would have to send the Braves at least $20M for 2019, and similar sums for 2020 and 2021, or ~$60M total.

    That cash increases the surplus value of the package to ~$85M.

    Do the Braves want to send $85M in prospect capital for Peralta and Greinke on a 3/45 deal?

    Seems like a bad decision, and I would prefer signing Grandal/Ramos, signing Brantley/Cutch, and trading for Paxton for around the same opening day payroll figure. Paxton is younger and better than Greinke, and I see no real upside to Peralta over Brantley/Cutch.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    Carp (11-16-2018), JohnAdcox (11-19-2018), jpx7 (11-16-2018), salmagundy (11-16-2018)

  5. #24
    Gwinnett Bound
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    614
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    118 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I agree that the Braves almost certainly wouldn't take on Greinke's entire contract. I'm not sure how much the DBacks would have to take on, but I going to assume it would be enough to facilitate the Braves adding Ramos/Grandal.

    If we assume:

    - the Braves 2019 opening day payroll will be $120M-$125M
    - the Braves already have ~$82M of that accounted for
    - the Braves need $20M in 2019 for C, bench and BP additions
    - the proposed Greinke/Peralta package has a total surplus value of ~$25M
    - the combined 2019 salary for Greinke/Peralta is $42M

    That puts the Braves right at $125M, and essentially no room to add a C or anything else.

    To make it work, the DBacks would have to send the Braves at least $20M for 2019, and similar sums for 2020 and 2021, or ~$60M total.

    That cash increases the surplus value of the package to ~$85M.

    Do the Braves want to send $85M in prospect capital for Peralta and Greinke on a 3/45 deal?

    Seems like a bad decision, and I would prefer signing Grandal/Ramos, signing Brantley/Cutch, and trading for Paxton for around the same opening day payroll figure. Paxton is younger and better than Greinke, and I see no real upside to Peralta over Brantley/Cutch.

    One wrinkle that may have already discussed in this thread. 62.5 million of this contract was deferred. He is due 12.5 million from 22 to 26. I'm not sure how to post links. If the Dbacks would eat the deferred money he would be a great deal. I'm assuming that the deferred money is worth around 10 million per year.

  6. #25
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    According to MLBTR, the DBacks are aggressively shopping Greinke: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/...ats-phils.html

    We know the Braves need a cOF, and there is a lot of chatter about them also acquiring that "frontline starter" everyone always wants them to go after. Greinke is old, but he still approximates a "frontline starter".

    Greinke is owed $95M over the next 3 years, is definitely in his decline phase, and is probably projected to produce around 9 wins over those 3 years (3.5, 3, 2.5). He represents a surplus value in the neighborhood of -$10M+ (yes, negative trade value).

    Peralta has 2 years of arb control, will probably earn about $18M over those 2 years, and be projected to produce around 5-6 wins over those years. He represents a surplus value of ~$35M.

    The Braves could blow their entire 2019 payroll on Greinke and Peralta ($40M+ total) while only giving up $25M in prospect capital. They could increase the package going back the the DBacks in exchange for cash that would allow them to spend a bit more on C and the bench.

    No way do I want 3 years of Greinke, but that's a deal that could be out there if AA really wants to add a SP.
    I believe the DBs are desperate for pitching. i think Walker is having TJ and is out for the year.

    They might take JT back. Could JT + Newk get that done? They get rid of Grienke and can replace his innings and Walker's innings with some upside.

    That gives us some money back to get a catcher.

    My worry is it takes up too much space for us to get extensions done with the young guys.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Russ2dollas For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (11-19-2018)

  8. #26
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    I think it’s fair to think that there are free agent pitchers who we could get for less than Greinke.

    I think you only make this deal if zona is desperate to move the money. And if that is the case then they are not eating much money.

    Taking jt offsets 12 million. Maybe they take oday too but we might want him.

    If we do this deal it’s probably setting up for all other moves to be trades for people under original team control.

  9. #27
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanforlife88 View Post
    The more you think of it, the more it makes sense....last year we did the contract swaps of Kemp for McCarthy, Gonzalez, and Kazmir....McCarthy actually turned out to be big for us early in the season along with Culberson... Greinke could be a big add for us at the top of the rotation....

    Greinke, Bradley, and Peralta would be a big haul for us. Then sign Grandal.

    Inciarte CF
    Acuna LF
    Freeman 1B
    Peralta RF
    Camargo 3B
    Grandal C
    Albies 2B
    Swanson SS

    Culberson
    Flowers
    Duvall

    Greinke
    Folty
    Gausman
    Newk (if not in the Greinke deal)
    Soroka,Wilson.Touki,Freid, Gohara fight it out for the last 1 or 2 spots.

    Bradley
    Viz
    Minter
    Sobotka
    Venters
    Biddle
    Carle
    O'Day
    Winkler

    I don't like that we did not upgrade the bench. But the BP should be better, the rotation got better, we got better at C and cOF.
    If inciarte hits first aa has failed in roster construction and/or managing snit

  10. #28
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    29,811
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,724
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8,765
    Thanked in
    5,854 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    I believe the DBs are desperate for pitching. i think Walker is having TJ and is out for the year.

    They might take JT back. Could JT + Newk get that done? They get rid of Grienke and can replace his innings and Walker's innings with some upside.

    That gives us some money back to get a catcher.

    My worry is it takes up too much space for us to get extensions done with the young guys.
    Greinke would be off the books before it's time for the young guys to make serious money.

  11. #29
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    If we are dealing with the Dbacks I’d prefer to go after Ray as a back up plan to Paxton.

  12. #30
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oklahomabrave View Post
    If we are dealing with the Dbacks I’d prefer to go after Ray as a back up plan to Paxton.
    I love Ray on fantasy teams, but would you really want to give up much for him in the real world? He's only made 32 starts once, and when you look at the Steamer projections for Ray and Newcomb side-by-side, is he THAT big an upgrade?

    Ray - 31 starts, 176 IP, 11.32 Ks/9, 4.02 BBs/9, 3.63 FIP
    Newcomb - 31 starts, 177 IP, 9.10 K/9, 4.46 BB/9, 4.30 FIP

    If Newk improves his control a little, they're essentially the same Pitcher. I'm not saying he's going to, but teams looking at Ray don't have the pitching depth the Braves do and they'd be looking at him as a substantial upgrade to what they currently have - and he's certainly not an "Ace".

    When you've also already got Gohara and Fried behind Newcomb, I don't see much of a reason to give up much for two years of Ray for more money.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  13. #31
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Ray is significantly better than Newk.

    Also the Dbacks are shopping Greinke not Ray. For self-evident reasons. They are motivated to move Greinke and maybe we can exploit that to land Peralta. I think Peralta should be our main target when talking with the Dbacks. Everything else is a means to that end.

  14. #32
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Ray is significantly better than Newk.

    Also the Dbacks are shopping Greinke not Ray. For self-evident reasons. They are motivated to move Greinke and maybe we can exploit that to land Peralta. I think Peralta should be our main target when talking with the Dbacks. Everything else is a means to that end.
    I wasn't arguing that Ray wasn't better - just that he's not someone I'd target. He's not so much better than Newcomb, Gohara, or Fried that I'd give up much to get him given the comparative lack of team control and the fact that I don't think he fits the TOR-type guy AA would be looking for if he wants someone to front the rotation.

    If you can work out a Peralta deal involving Greinke and Peralta that's "fair", I get it - I wouldn't be particularly interested in giving up a whole lot if that were to change to a deal for Ray and Peralta is all.
    Last edited by clvclv; 11-17-2018 at 01:17 PM.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  15. #33
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    I think the diamondbacks pu pu platter is a lot less attractive than the people who like it do.

    Greinke is the least dominant ace being discussed with the most financial commitment through the greatest age.

    Peralta is not any better than the free agents available.
    Last edited by Southcack77; 11-17-2018 at 01:34 PM.

  16. #34
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I think the diamondbacks pu pu platter is a lot less attractive than the people who like it do.

    Greenie is the least dominant ace being discussed with the most commitment to the greatest age.

    Peralta is not any better than the free agents available.
    I agree. I’m not that high on a Dbacks deal in general and hope we look elsewhere

  17. #35
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Wrong place.
    Last edited by clvclv; 11-17-2018 at 01:47 PM.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  18. #36
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,455
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    How much longer are folks going to use the “if he improves his control” line with Newk?

  19. #37
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,420
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    434
    Thanked in
    265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    How much longer are folks going to use the “if he improves his control” line with Newk?
    Until he’s traded regardless of when that is.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Oklahomabrave For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (11-19-2018)

  21. #38
    It's OVER 5,000! jsebe10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    11,124
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    140
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    687
    Thanked in
    561 Posts
    Only thing I’m taking from the DBacks is Corbin..nothing else.

  22. #39
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,455
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,025
    Thanked in
    6,128 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jsebe10 View Post
    Only thing I’m taking from the DBacks is Corbin..nothing else.
    You want the Braves to be the team who gives Corbin $100M+?

  23. #40
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    771
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,697
    Thanked in
    1,988 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jsebe10 View Post
    Only thing I’m taking from the DBacks is Corbin..nothing else.
    He's a FA not a Diamondback and barf... that'd be the dumbest signing of the off season if we pay premium dollars for Corbin who will almost certainly regress significantly.

Similar Threads

  1. Surplus value calculations of the Greinke trade
    By Enscheff in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-01-2019, 12:19 PM
  2. Kluber Paxton Greinke and Others
    By nsacpi in forum Extented Spring Training
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 11-14-2018, 01:34 PM
  3. Greinke
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-17-2017, 04:52 PM
  4. Jhonny Peralta Injured
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 03-10-2016, 02:22 PM
  5. Replies: 164
    Last Post: 05-20-2014, 01:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •