Is Free Speech Under Attack in this Country?

[cajunrevenge]

why is it propaganda?

Why don't they censor clear falsehoods like russia collusion and pee tapes?

Why don't they censor illegally obtained tax returns?

Why do you always find yourself on here defending censorship? Maybe that says something...

Well first Russian Collusion wasnt false. He asked for Russia to illegally get and release Hillay's emails to help him in an election. His campaign manager shared internal polling with a former KGB agent who fled to Russia and then lied both about the meeting and the topics discussed in the meetings. They dont remove all the insane postings about Russia from the people you and thethe visit either. Why dont you tell me specific stories about Russian Collusion that were proven fake instead of generalizing the whole thing. Fact is you and little thethe make up the positions of the left and try to argue against that. I have repeatedly asked for any of the evidence that anyone here or the mainstream media said Russian Collusion was a guarantee. What you will find if you look is a lot of people expecting Mueller to follow the money trail with Russia. He did not do that. That was our and the media's only mistake I can remember. This idea that the media was pushing that Russian Collusion was guaranteed to take Trump down is a fantasy created by Trump and bought hook line and sinker by the people like you. Their propaganda works.



As for the pee tape, how is twatter supposed to verify that ones doesnt exist?


As for the tax returns can you get them off twatter? Is there any proof it was illegally obtained? Last time his taxes leaked it was his own family who leaked. Besides that Trump says they are fake so how can they illegally leak something that isnt real?

[cajunrevenge]

LOL.

"Why doesn't Biden get those Fox interviews!?!?!?!"

[Biden declines Fox interview]

"AS he should!!!!"

Defend your censorship fella

I am sure if Fox wants to do an interview where they have a sycophant ask him questions like "Donald Trumps campaign manager was caught red handed colluding with a former KGB agent in 2016, probably the greatest political crime in history, whats your response" or "The fake news media is really going after your son Hunter but largely ignoring the corrupt behavior by Trumps kids in the white house......." he would do it. Like I said, it would be the same as Trump agreeing to an interview with the DNC.

[cajunrevenge]

https://patch.com/california/san-die...-accused-other



Where does using violence against people for "seditious speech" fall on the free speech scale-o-meter

[sturg33]

So twitter reversing and undoing its orwellian censorship policy... i guess, despite many cheerleaders on this board and across the left, there was still enough pushback of selectively censoring speech to make them reconsider.

[sturg33]

But glad we got on the record 57, nsacpi, cajun, and metas embrace of the censorship as they consistently have during the trump era

[Metaphysicist]

what did I do now? You sure attribute a lot of stuff to me...

[nsacpi]

what did I do now? You sure attribute a lot of stuff to me...

don't worry, you're not getting some sort of selective treatment

[cajunrevenge]

Censorship takes a lot of forms and is all around you. I have no problem with a private company censoring a Russian attempt to influence the election with fake news. There is 71 pages in this thread. Without looking through all of them, have you once criticized President Trump for any of his attempts to violate peoples first amendment right without "the left" bringing it to your attention. The point you want to make goes right out the window when you ignore the biggest threat to the first amendment. Can you show me anything Biden has said that threatens free speech? You just like to cite random crazies on the left and attribute that to Biden although he is probably the most conservative Democrat in the Senate and routinely worked with Republicans on Crime bills and tax cuts.

[sturg33]

what did I do now? You sure attribute a lot of stuff to me...

Seemed to me you came to the defense of the censorship under the guise of stopping propaganda.

[sturg33]

Censorship takes a lot of forms and is all around you. I have no problem with a private company censoring a Russian attempt to influence the election with fake news. There is 71 pages in this thread. Without looking through all of them, have you once criticized President Trump for any of his attempts to violate peoples first amendment right without "the left" bringing it to your attention. The point you want to make goes right out the window when you ignore the biggest threat to the first amendment. Can you show me anything Biden has said that threatens free speech? You just like to cite random crazies on the left and attribute that to Biden although he is probably the most conservative Democrat in the Senate and routinely worked with Republicans on Crime bills and tax cuts.

You should read my first post in this thread

[Metaphysicist]

Seemed to me you came to the defense of the censorship under the guise of stopping propaganda.

Does it? I don't think I trust how things "seem" to you. You haven't really been winning awards for self-awareness recently.

[goldfly]

he still in here crying that people can't lie and spread propaganda

and trying to act like free speech is under attack cause twitter and others are like

"yeah, nah bruh"

lol

[sturg33]

Does it? I don't think I trust how things "seem" to you. You haven't really been winning awards for self-awareness recently.

I see.

So you were against Twitter censoring the NY Post article?

Weird you didn't say anything when you posted

[sturg33]

he still in here crying that people can't lie and spread propaganda freely

and trying to act like free speech is under attack cause twitter and others are like

"yeah, nah bruh"

lol

1. Why is it a lie?

2. Lying is free speech

[Tapate50]

Wait we got pee pee videos?

//Closes door

[Metaphysicist]

I see.

So you were against Twitter censoring the NY Post article?

Weird you didn't say anything when you posted

Weird that you demand people take extreme positions on literally everything. You are too online.

[sturg33]

Weird that you demand people take extreme positions on literally everything. You are too online.

Feel free to make your position clear.

So far you've posted 0 issue with Twitters action...you've made sure to take issue with who they censored and who posted about the censorship

[goldfly]

Weird that you demand people take extreme positions on literally everything. You are too online.

while complaining that people want the president to denounce the extremes he dabbles in

[Metaphysicist]

Feel free to make your position clear.

So far you've posted 0 issue with Twitters action...you've made sure to take issue with who they censored and who posted about the censorship

TAKE A POSITION ON MY LOADED QUESTION WHERE I HAVE DEFINED THE TERMS INCORRECTLY SO I CAN YELL ABOUT IT

Uh, how about no.

[sturg33]

shocker. you're free to say "hey - the NY Post is ****... but I don't like twitter censoring anything"

you continue to choose not to do so.

so yeah, my earlier statement, about meta supporting censorship, holds up quite well