User Tag List

Page 95 of 116 FirstFirst ... 45859394959697105 ... LastLast
Results 1,881 to 1,900 of 2310

Thread: Around The Majors 2019

  1. #1881
    Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is. jpx7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,216
    Thanks
    26,514
    Thanked 5,456 Times in 3,182 Posts
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    Oh, I don’t know about that one, Chief.
    We set a high bar for that, as a society, but especially on this forum.
    "For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."

  2. #1882
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,904
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked 1,247 Times in 862 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    Montgomery is almost certainly going to contribute to the Royals, but who cares? The Royals are going to be awful for the next 2.5 years. Like I said, I can see the argument that Montgomery could rebuild value and be flipped, but if the Royals idea was to trade for him and keep him for 2.5 years, then its a really dumb deal albeit relatively inconsequential, and the Royals would have been far better off getting the 35 FV prospect. At least that player would have a chance at being a contributor at some point on a contending team.
    It doesn't have to be either/or. The Royals are unlikely to be competitors in the upcoming seasons barring some clever FA additions and some luck from a mostly barren farm system; however, that doesn't mean they shouldn't try to get better. Montgomery potentially can help them get better while also rebuilding his value into something worth trading for a better prospect than the 35 FV guy Maldonado would have brought back.

  3. #1883
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,628
    Thanks
    916
    Thanked 1,060 Times in 719 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    It doesn't have to be either/or. The Royals are unlikely to be competitors in the upcoming seasons barring some clever FA additions and some luck from a mostly barren farm system; however, that doesn't mean they shouldn't try to get better. Montgomery potentially can help them get better while also rebuilding his value into something worth trading for a better prospect than the 35 FV guy Maldonado would have brought back.
    Montgomery could probably fairly easily rebuild his value enough to get a 35 prospect........he and MM have pretty much the same value.....i do not get the point being made.
    "This is the end of my presidency. I'm ****ed." - Donald J. Trump, innocent and totally exonerated man, upon hearing a special counsel has been appointed to investigate him.

  4. #1884
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 959 Times in 644 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    It doesn't have to be either/or. The Royals are unlikely to be competitors in the upcoming seasons barring some clever FA additions and some luck from a mostly barren farm system; however, that doesn't mean they shouldn't try to get better. Montgomery potentially can help them get better while also rebuilding his value into something worth trading for a better prospect than the 35 FV guy Maldonado would have brought back.
    I guess this is just a philosophical disagreement on how rebuilds should be done. I think a team in a rebuilding process needs to embrace the suck and only focus on acquiring future value in the form of bettering their farm system. If that is what the Royals are planning to do with Montgomery, then that might be a better idea than trying to get that value out of Maldonado. If the Royals plan to keep Montgomery for 2.5 years in the hope that he'll turn them into a 67 win team instead of a 65 win team, that is where I have the problem. I think that is stupid. Its the same reason why I was against the signing of Markakis at the outset of our rebuild.

    At the same time, I understand that there will inevitably be some value wasted on a bad rebuilding team and it could make sense to hold on to some assets that you think might contribute to a future competitive window, even if that means wasting some of their best years on a bad team. That is why I was fine with keeping Freeman and would have been fine with keeping Andrelton. I don't think Montgomery fits that role for the Royals and I think its a terrible idea to actually trade for guys whose value you plan on wasting, unless you plan on flipping him for something better later on. Otherwise, just go out and sign one of the dozens of replacement level players for league minimum in order to fill out your roster.

    This move is a lesser extreme than some of the other ones that I think the Royals have screwed up since these players are barely above replacement level themselves, but it does point to an approach that I think will hurt the Royals moving forward.

  5. #1885
    Sabermetric Slut
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Your Mom's Basement
    Posts
    16,697
    Thanks
    1,018
    Thanked 4,693 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Giants are winning again today.

  6. #1886
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    15,932
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 3,177 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thewupk View Post
    Giants are winning again today.
    Personally I hope they keep winning. I just don't think we'll get bumgarner or Smith, but I think some of our competition might. I would love to have smith and like bumgarner though

  7. #1887
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 959 Times in 644 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Super View Post
    Montgomery could probably fairly easily rebuild his value enough to get a 35 prospect........he and MM have pretty much the same value.....i do not get the point being made.
    Are you talking about my point? Have I not said over and over and over at this point that my original post was under the assumption that Montgomery was a free agent at the end of this year? I think we could all agree that this trade would have been stupid under those circumstances, but I was wrong. I'm not sure why I thought his contract was expiring. Then clv made a bad justification for making the trade which started the other discussion while Enscheff and jpx pointed out that he must be looking to flip him for something in the future, a point with which I agreed once I realized he had 2.5 years of control left.

  8. #1888
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    13,332
    Thanks
    3,496
    Thanked 1,502 Times in 1,088 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Personally I hope they keep winning. I just don't think we'll get bumgarner or Smith, but I think some of our competition might. I would love to have smith and like bumgarner though
    I tend to agree. I've said for a while that I think the Braves end up with a guy a tier or two under Smith, like Greene or even Watson.

    Bumgarner can do whatever.
    "Can a man still be brave if he is afraid? That is the only time a man can be brave." - G.R.R.M (Game of Thrones)

    "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." - F. Scott Fitzgerald (G. Gatsby)

  9. #1889
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,904
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked 1,247 Times in 862 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanieAntics View Post
    I guess this is just a philosophical disagreement on how rebuilds should be done. I think a team in a rebuilding process needs to embrace the suck and only focus on acquiring future value in the form of bettering their farm system. If that is what the Royals are planning to do with Montgomery, then that might be a better idea than trying to get that value out of Maldonado. If the Royals plan to keep Montgomery for 2.5 years in the hope that he'll turn them into a 67 win team instead of a 65 win team, that is where I have the problem. I think that is stupid. Its the same reason why I was against the signing of Markakis at the outset of our rebuild.

    At the same time, I understand that there will inevitably be some value wasted on a bad rebuilding team and it could make sense to hold on to some assets that you think might contribute to a future competitive window, even if that means wasting some of their best years on a bad team. That is why I was fine with keeping Freeman and would have been fine with keeping Andrelton. I don't think Montgomery fits that role for the Royals and I think its a terrible idea to actually trade for guys whose value you plan on wasting, unless you plan on flipping him for something better later on. Otherwise, just go out and sign one of the dozens of replacement level players for league minimum in order to fill out your roster.

    This move is a lesser extreme than some of the other ones that I think the Royals have screwed up since these players are barely above replacement level themselves, but it does point to an approach that I think will hurt the Royals moving forward.
    I've never understood the idea of "embrace the suck." IMO, you should never stop trying to get better, even in rebuilding years. That doesn't mean mortgage the future either. Like nsacpi says, you always look for the best value. While obviously you don't want to sacrifice the future, you can add plenty of value guys like the Braves did in 2017 with Dickey, Colon, Garcia, and Sean Rodriguez and still put out the best roster you can for your budget, in hopes of either competing or flipping these guys at the deadline. The Braves managed to only trade Garcia, but he brought back Ynoa who is now solidly among our top 10-15 propsects. I'm sure the goal isn't to only improve 2 wins with such moves, but if a move like this results in that outcome, I also don't see the big deal. The MLB draft isn't like the NFL draft.
    Last edited by Carp; 07-17-2019 at 02:42 PM.

  10. #1890
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 959 Times in 644 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    I've never understood the idea of "embrace the suck." IMO, you should never stop trying to get better, even in rebuilding years. That doesn't mean mortgage the future either. Like nsacpi says, you always look for the best value. While obviously you don't want to sacrifice the future, you can add plenty of value guys like the Braves did in 2017 with Dickey, Colon, Garcia, and Sean Rodriguez and still put out the best roster you can for your budget, in hopes of either competing or flipping these guys at the deadline. The Braves managed to only trade Garcia, but he brought back Ynoa who is now solidly among our top 10-15 propsects. I'm sure the goal isn't to only improve 2 wins with such moves, but if a move like this results in that outcome, I also don't see the big deal. The MLB draft isn't like the NFL draft.
    The idea behind embracing the suck is to not waste value on bad teams when that value isn't likely to contribute when your good again. Instead, you should trade that current value when you can in order to get assets that will help your team once you are good again. Its not just about being terrible to get a good draft pick, although that is part of it. But its also about building up a farm system that will eventually develop into a competing MLB roster.

    The Royals already have a very underwhelming farm system that is probably bottom third in the league. They don't have very many MLB assets to trade that would make it better, and their best asset, Merrifield (who is 30), is currently wasting his prime seasons on a terrible team. If there were ever a team that desperately needed to embrace the suck, its the KC Royals. They have a likely seller's market this year and have a prime opportunity to make their future a lot brighter. They should be looking to move Dozier, Merrifield, Soler, Kennedy, Diekman, and any other older asset that they can extract value out of.

  11. #1891
    Awaiting a Promotion
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    588
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 171 Times in 103 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love how this board can go 3 pages arguing about a player's value on another team, that Braves will never get, nor want.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Nerfherders For This Useful Post:

    bravesfanforlife88 (07-17-2019)

  13. #1892
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,060
    Thanks
    1,380
    Thanked 3,455 Times in 2,072 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nerfherders View Post
    I love how this board can go 3 pages arguing about a player's value on another team, that Braves will never get, nor want.
    Crap. Are We talking about Hayward again
    Coppy

  14. #1893
    It's OVER 5,000! UNCBlue012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina
    Posts
    13,332
    Thanks
    3,496
    Thanked 1,502 Times in 1,088 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "Can a man still be brave if he is afraid? That is the only time a man can be brave." - G.R.R.M (Game of Thrones)

    "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." - F. Scott Fitzgerald (G. Gatsby)

  15. #1894
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    15,932
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 3,177 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    Wright vs Strasburg
    Julio vs Corbin
    Soroka/Gausman vs ?
    Soroka/Gausman vs scherzer?

    They seems to have the pitching advantage if that's how it plays out. I'm gonna be there Saturday... hopefully it's soroka

  16. #1895
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    12,060
    Thanks
    1,380
    Thanked 3,455 Times in 2,072 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see why but I wish Gaus could have had one more minor league start. His last start was good but he got in trouble early and better hitters might have buried him. That said I am not sure when his rehab is up either.
    Coppy

  17. #1896
    Shift Leader CyYoung31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,943
    Thanks
    1,001
    Thanked 6,032 Times in 3,051 Posts
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Wright vs Strasburg
    Julio vs Corbin
    Soroka/Gausman vs ?
    Soroka/Gausman vs scherzer?

    They seems to have the pitching advantage if that's how it plays out. I'm gonna be there Saturday... hopefully it's soroka
    They’d have the advantage in almost any matchup.

  18. #1897
    It's OVER 5,000! msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    15,932
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 3,177 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    They’d have the advantage in almost any matchup.
    Yeah, I guess you're right... assuming scherzer pitches

  19. #1898
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,904
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked 1,247 Times in 862 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CyYoung31 View Post
    They’d have the advantage in almost any matchup.
    Except when Stras pitches. We own him.

  20. #1899
    PosiBraves Hell Gatekeeper
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    17,423
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 5,579 Times in 3,305 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by UNCBlue012 View Post
    I expected Wright to run with his chance in the rotation at the beginning of this year, but it was clear he wasn't executing/locating his pitches at all.

    It will be very interesting to see if he has figured anything out.

    I'm still probably the high man on Wright around here.
    I think he (Teheran) finishes with a FIP ~3.3. -CrazyTrain 3/25/2019

    Gausman had a bad walk ratio for us -CrazyTrain 11/20/2018
    BB/9 with Braves: 2.72

    Fried, Newk and a couple other guys for Bumgarner and give him a pay day for 6ish years -CrazyTrain 10/15/18

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Enscheff For This Useful Post:

    UNCBlue012 (07-18-2019)

  22. #1900
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,558
    Thanks
    4,888
    Thanked 2,892 Times in 1,806 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    I expected Wright to run with his chance in the rotation at the beginning of this year, but it was clear he wasn't executing/locating his pitches at all.

    It will be very interesting to see if he has figured anything out.

    I'm still probably the high man on Wright around here.
    Probably right there with you. Wasn’t there mention of him and Carle tipping pitches last time up?

    For some reason I feel like this time he makes a case to stay. I was really impressed the last time up with the stuff, but the location was really lacking.

    He’s been on a heater at Gwinnett.
    "No thanks, I'd rather sit in the balcony" - Abe Lincoln

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •