AA is sure to have a plan B,C&D in place....and its probably not anything we are thinking about.
Do we have any idea what Castellanos would cost ?
Ivermectin Man
Super (01-15-2020)
Castellanos is my preference if we're gonna go cheap at 3b. His numbers in Chicago were fantastic, so not worried about his ability to hit NL pitching. And his defense is trending upwards in the OF.
Ozuna is tough to figure out. His 2019 peripherals were actually in line with his 2017 season. BB Rate, HR rate, LD%, all were at 2017 levels. But he didn't see any practical improvement from the 2018 season as a whole. His BABIP in 2017 and 2019 is separated by 100 points, so his true value is somewhere in the middle, but I do worry that Ozuna is simply what his career stats say he is. That's a useful player, but I don't know that it's someone I'd commit more than 3 years to, and I do think there's a good chance it's gonna take at least 4/60 to get him. Plus he has a draft pick loss attached to him.
I think from a production standpoint, Marte is the answer. However, the logjam in the outfield that he creates is less than ideal.
He had 43 HR and 60 SB in 277 games during 2018 and 2019, hit .295 w/ .342 OBP in 2019, and is only owed $11.5M in 2020, with a $12.5M team option in 2021 that has a $1M buyout. The length and $ seems perfect, but that will surely drive up the prospect capital required to trade for him.
Snowman (01-15-2020)
I guess I don't understand why the Braves would also be asking for Archer in a Marte deal. He's not really the kind of salary that it makes a whole lot of sense to try and dump and it's questionable whether the Braves really need someone like him right now. I think it would absolutely be reasonable for some club to take a shot at him returning to a mid 3 FIP at 8m. Particularly one that is confident in its pitching management.