Page 212 of 289 FirstFirst ... 112162202210211212213214222262 ... LastLast
Results 4,221 to 4,240 of 5779

Thread: Official Offseason Thread

  1. #4221
    It's OVER 5,000! Hudson2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,694
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    956
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,455
    Thanked in
    1,123 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    For the posters that teach me about analytics...how bad would castellanos be at 3b?

    His numbers were bad and he’s older now. But now we have shifts and less balls hit on the ground.

    I don’t really think it’s an option but o don’t like the packages I’m seeing for Bryant trades
    If anybody could make NC serviceable at 3b it’d be Ron Washington.

  2. #4222
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    AA is sure to have a plan B,C&D in place....and its probably not anything we are thinking about.

  3. #4223
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,444
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,089
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,709
    Thanked in
    3,896 Posts
    Do we have any idea what Castellanos would cost ?
    Ivermectin Man

  4. #4224
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,889
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    319
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    203
    Thanked in
    153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ2dollas View Post
    For the posters that teach me about analytics...how bad would castellanos be at 3b?

    His numbers were bad and he’s older now. But now we have shifts and less balls hit on the ground.

    I don’t really think it’s an option but o don’t like the packages I’m seeing for Bryant trades
    IMO Castellanos would be the ideal pickup IF it was a certainty that the DH is coming in 2022. Otherwise signing him now would mandate a trade before too long if the prospects mature as expected.

  5. #4225
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nsacpi View Post
    Yup. Been thinking the same.
    I'm perfectly happy not having signed Todd Frazier.

  6. #4226
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PawPawMaxwell View Post
    Im not missing any point. If we take on any meaningful salary at this point we are going to have to get rid of some salary. BTW I already stated that Seattle has no need of Ender so you are repetitive or ignoring my point. That in itself eliminates Seattle as a trade partner. With us taking Marte and Archer Pitt rids significant salary. Ender and prospects is not too much for AA to ask. Keeping Duvall, Markakis, Acuna, Ender, and adding another starting OFer means someone has to go like it or not and extra roster spot can be better used.
    I don't want any part of Chris Archer in any scenario.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Snowman For This Useful Post:

    Super (01-15-2020)

  8. #4227
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,479
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,759
    Thanked in
    1,987 Posts
    Castellanos is my preference if we're gonna go cheap at 3b. His numbers in Chicago were fantastic, so not worried about his ability to hit NL pitching. And his defense is trending upwards in the OF.

    Ozuna is tough to figure out. His 2019 peripherals were actually in line with his 2017 season. BB Rate, HR rate, LD%, all were at 2017 levels. But he didn't see any practical improvement from the 2018 season as a whole. His BABIP in 2017 and 2019 is separated by 100 points, so his true value is somewhere in the middle, but I do worry that Ozuna is simply what his career stats say he is. That's a useful player, but I don't know that it's someone I'd commit more than 3 years to, and I do think there's a good chance it's gonna take at least 4/60 to get him. Plus he has a draft pick loss attached to him.

  9. #4228
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,889
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    319
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    203
    Thanked in
    153 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    I don't want any part of Chris Archer in any scenario.
    I can understand your view but OTOH Braves had considerable interest in him in the past and even today I don't think he would be that detrimental as a backend starter.

  10. #4229
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,640
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tululush View Post
    And the reality is we’ll likely settle for lesser production. Such a disappointing scenario. And it’s not entirely AA’s fault. Let’s say he doesn’t sign Will Smith. I’m still convinced we’re in the same position. He clearly didn’t want to tie future money into Donaldson out of fear of a sunk cost. We were never going to sign him, regardless of how much we had available to us in this year’s budget. It was always about 2023 and 2024 and AA did not want to go there with JD.
    It really isn't AA's fault. It not a great situation. There's no clearly correct choice unless some fantastic trade falls into our lap. Everything is going to have a downside. Either we settle for less or we overpay. Neither is ideal.

  11. #4230
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PawPawMaxwell View Post
    I can understand your view but OTOH Braves had considerable interest in him in the past and even today I don't think he would be that detrimental as a backend starter.
    He's literally now a replacement level pitcher with only one successful pitch. Maybe he could find success as an almost slider-exclusive short reliever, but I wouldn't want to be the ones to try it.

  12. #4231
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,479
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,759
    Thanked in
    1,987 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PawPawMaxwell View Post
    Im not missing any point. If we take on any meaningful salary at this point we are going to have to get rid of some salary. BTW I already stated that Seattle has no need of Ender so you are repetitive or ignoring my point. That in itself eliminates Seattle as a trade partner. With us taking Marte and Archer Pitt rids significant salary. Ender and prospects is not too much for AA to ask. Keeping Duvall, Markakis, Acuna, Ender, and adding another starting OFer means someone has to go like it or not and extra roster spot can be better used.
    We were just trying to sign JD at 20+ million per year. Why would we have to get rid of salary to take on player(s) making less than that? That makes zero sense.

  13. #4232
    Anytime Now Frankie... tululush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,577
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    225
    Thanked in
    180 Posts
    I think from a production standpoint, Marte is the answer. However, the logjam in the outfield that he creates is less than ideal.

    He had 43 HR and 60 SB in 277 games during 2018 and 2019, hit .295 w/ .342 OBP in 2019, and is only owed $11.5M in 2020, with a $12.5M team option in 2021 that has a $1M buyout. The length and $ seems perfect, but that will surely drive up the prospect capital required to trade for him.

  14. #4233
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    I'm perfectly happy not having signed Todd Frazier.
    Frazier on a one-year deal is better than most of the options that have been discussed around here.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  15. #4234
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,479
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,759
    Thanked in
    1,987 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tapate50 View Post
    Do we have any idea what Castellanos would cost ?
    ~15 million per season seems to be the common opinion. The years is the question. He's looking for a 4 year deal. I would do 3/45 with a 4th year option and 5 million buyout.

  16. #4235
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Castellanos is my preference if we're gonna go cheap at 3b. His numbers in Chicago were fantastic, so not worried about his ability to hit NL pitching. And his defense is trending upwards in the OF.

    Ozuna is tough to figure out. His 2019 peripherals were actually in line with his 2017 season. BB Rate, HR rate, LD%, all were at 2017 levels. But he didn't see any practical improvement from the 2018 season as a whole. His BABIP in 2017 and 2019 is separated by 100 points, so his true value is somewhere in the middle, but I do worry that Ozuna is simply what his career stats say he is. That's a useful player, but I don't know that it's someone I'd commit more than 3 years to, and I do think there's a good chance it's gonna take at least 4/60 to get him. Plus he has a draft pick loss attached to him.
    The expected stats suggest that last year should have been the best season of Ozuna's career as a hitter. Obviously did not turn out that way in the stat book. I'd be happy to sign him.

  17. #4236
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,388
    Thanked in
    7,537 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Castellanos is my preference if we're gonna go cheap at 3b. His numbers in Chicago were fantastic, so not worried about his ability to hit NL pitching. And his defense is trending upwards in the OF.
    1) Numbers in NL are a small sample.

    2) Recent outfield defense numbers are a small sample. Which for defense is even more volatile than offensive numbers.

    3) Depends on price and years.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

  18. #4237
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    101
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    137 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tululush View Post
    I think from a production standpoint, Marte is the answer. However, the logjam in the outfield that he creates is less than ideal.

    He had 43 HR and 60 SB in 277 games during 2018 and 2019, hit .295 w/ .342 OBP in 2019, and is only owed $11.5M in 2020, with a $12.5M team option in 2021 that has a $1M buyout. The length and $ seems perfect, but that will surely drive up the prospect capital required to trade for him.
    Took that quote on Marte directly from The Athletic article I see. Nicely done.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Skeeter31 For This Useful Post:

    Snowman (01-15-2020)

  20. #4238
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Southcack77 View Post
    The expected stats suggest that last year should have been the best season of Ozuna's career as a hitter. Obviously did not turn out that way in the stat book. I'd be happy to sign him.
    Well, this got my attention. Where do you see those?

  21. #4239
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    I don't want any part of Chris Archer in any scenario.

    I guess I don't understand why the Braves would also be asking for Archer in a Marte deal. He's not really the kind of salary that it makes a whole lot of sense to try and dump and it's questionable whether the Braves really need someone like him right now. I think it would absolutely be reasonable for some club to take a shot at him returning to a mid 3 FIP at 8m. Particularly one that is confident in its pitching management.

  22. #4240
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,778
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    270
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,492
    Thanked in
    1,151 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Well, this got my attention. Where do you see those?
    https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savan...-r-hitting-mlb

Similar Threads

  1. The Official Thread of Pachemonium
    By SJ24 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 07-14-2018, 05:40 PM
  2. The Official Thread of Maitan Madness
    By SJ24 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-29-2017, 11:05 AM
  3. Official pre-Draft thread
    By Hudson2 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 1270
    Last Post: 06-13-2017, 03:01 PM
  4. The Official It's Better for Everyone That Dan Uggla's Done Thread
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 07-15-2014, 01:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •