Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: AA Under the Radar; Could a Blockbuster be coming?

  1. #1
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,368
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,806
    Thanked in
    2,448 Posts

    AA Under the Radar; Could a Blockbuster be coming?

    One thing has been consistent since AA became Braves' GM; none of his personnel moves have been tipped off, or even expected. Sure, much was speculated about Hamels coming to Atlanta, but that falls under the category of logical fit.

    We're hearing that Josh Donaldson is getting too pricey for the Braves, and possibly so is Bumgarner. But if his $100 demand can be fit in the budget, there's a move that hasn't even been floated that I'd like to be consider.

    Look at it this way: if Bumgarner does join Hamels atop the rotation, there is no need for Newcomb to be part of the rotation, and there are plenty of lefties in the pen. So, suddenly, he's quite expediable. So let's make a package that includes Newcomb, Tooki Toussaint, one of either Riley or Camargo and one of either Waters or Contreras. For what?

    Good question. Consider that the Reds are rumored to be moving Castillo, and the team is shopping for a corner outfielder and needs arms. I think that package might well be enough to secure Eugenio Suarez.

    Why Suarez? First of all, he's only 27. Second, dude hit 49 homers and even though he led the league in striking out, he drove in over 100 runs for the second straight season. Third, he's a countryman of Acuna's. Fourth: he's a bargain, under contract through 2025 -- 20:$9.25M, 21:$10.5M, 22:$11M, 23:$11M, 24:$11M, 25:$15M club option ($2M buyout).

    I'm not gonna bang the drum too loudly over this, but we keep hearing about all the currency the Braves have in the farm system. Maybe it won't take that much; certainly would not give more.

  2. #2
    "What is a clvclv"
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Nebo, NC
    Posts
    9,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    5,354
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,340
    Thanked in
    1,628 Posts
    Reds aren't moving Suarez IMO - he's the only offense they had last year, and they overpaid for Moose to help him.

    Suarez is their version of Freeman - that guy that everybody says is one of the most underrated players in the game, yet even then he's still underrated.

    Where did you see they're considering moving Castillo??? Maybe before they signed Moose - now they're dead-set on contending, and Touki or Newk would be their #5 at the very best. Contreras may not be as good as Tyler Stephenson, and is further away.

    Change the offer to Waters, Riley, Wright, and Anderson and they might not hang up the phone.
    Last edited by clvclv; 12-11-2019 at 07:46 AM.
    Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...

    Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?

  3. #3
    Mashin' to Mississippi
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    101
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    222
    Thanked in
    137 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rico43 View Post
    One thing has been consistent since AA became Braves' GM; none of his personnel moves have been tipped off, or even expected. Sure, much was speculated about Hamels coming to Atlanta, but that falls under the category of logical fit.

    We're hearing that Josh Donaldson is getting too pricey for the Braves, and possibly so is Bumgarner. But if his $100 demand can be fit in the budget, there's a move that hasn't even been floated that I'd like to be consider.

    Look at it this way: if Bumgarner does join Hamels atop the rotation, there is no need for Newcomb to be part of the rotation, and there are plenty of lefties in the pen. So, suddenly, he's quite expediable. So let's make a package that includes Newcomb, Tooki Toussaint, one of either Riley or Camargo and one of either Waters or Contreras. For what?

    Good question. Consider that the Reds are rumored to be moving Castillo, and the team is shopping for a corner outfielder and needs arms. I think that package might well be enough to secure Eugenio Suarez.

    Why Suarez? First of all, he's only 27. Second, dude hit 49 homers and even though he led the league in striking out, he drove in over 100 runs for the second straight season. Third, he's a countryman of Acuna's. Fourth: he's a bargain, under contract through 2025 -- 20:$9.25M, 21:$10.5M, 22:$11M, 23:$11M, 24:$11M, 25:$15M club option ($2M buyout).

    I'm not gonna bang the drum too loudly over this, but we keep hearing about all the currency the Braves have in the farm system. Maybe it won't take that much; certainly would not give more.
    Yeah I’m sorry Rico, but Newk, Touki, and Camargo have little to no trade value, unless they’re thrown into a package with Pache and Anderson. No one wants our AAAA rejects.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Skeeter31 For This Useful Post:

    Carp (12-11-2019)

  5. #4
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,480
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,407
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,761
    Thanked in
    1,988 Posts
    Newk and Touki probably each have somewhere between 10-15 million in surplus value presently. May be you could argue Newk has closer to 20 million in surplus value being that he's had some success both as a starter and reliever. Camargo has barely any surplus value now that he's arb eligible. He was a non-tender candidate for a reason. He'd have to repeat 2018 in order to gain much value.

    The point is, while they have value, those guys are most certainly secondary pieces at this point. I can't imagine anyone trading a franchise level player with lots of control for a package consisting of mostly secondary pieces and 1 good but not great prospect. Now, a package consisting of Newk, Touki, Waters, and Riley would be a decent offer in general as that package is likely worth around 90 million or more in surplus value and Suarez has roughly 100 million or more in surplus value.

    The main issue is the Reds aren't trading Suarez. They are looking to add quality players to their team, not take away. Senzel is the one piece you could argue they might part with, but I imagine it would have to be for an established star with lots of cheap control. Certainly we don't have anyone that fits that mold that we are willing to trade. Closest thing is Ender, but I doubt they have much of interest in parting with Senzel in a deal where Ender is the headliner.
    Last edited by Carp; 12-11-2019 at 08:38 AM.

  6. #5
    Called Up to the Major Leagues
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,889
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    319
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    203
    Thanked in
    153 Posts
    Response to Ricos post. Not sure about rumors to move Castillo but all else checks about Reds. Moose is better at 3d, need pitching bad, want to contend, so I am going to play along with the block buster idea and change the package a bit. Braves get Castillo and Saurez.
    Send to Reds: Folty, Fried, Wright, Waters, Camargo and Riley. But only RIley after/if AA signs Ozuna or other cOF. Money wise the trade packages are a wash, leaves room for that cOf or a 5th starter

  7. #6
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,760
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    981
    Thanked in
    766 Posts
    I think the big move is coming. 40 man crunch and where we are in the win cycle. We are less able to let guys play and figure it out.

    I think AA wants to upgrade big time at 2 of 3B, SS and OF not named Acuna. Sign one and trade for the other.

    There are a ton of options to do that, but it's tough if you want to hang onto Pache, Waters and Anderson.

    The reds do have pieces I like. I would think they would be interested in Ender, but maybe they think Senzel can really play CF. I think Winker is a useful piece for us. Not a JD replacement piece but a guy that makes us better.

    I think the Marlins' Brian Anderson is the sneaky move. He'll cost a lot b/c he's controlled until 2024. But he can play 3B or OF. Marlins are going to contend for 3 years at least. The Braves and Marlins know what the marlins like for prospects given all of the realmuto discussion. Marlins would have to think outside the box and move him early. But he's not a draw there. They've tried to trade guys with a couple years of control and not gotten much. Riley, Muller and Wright? I think they'd want at least one of the big 3.

  8. #7
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,026
    Thanked in
    6,129 Posts
    Brian Anderson...very interesting target.

    I'm guessing the Marlins are too dumb to realize they won't be contending soon enough for Anderson to help them, but he would be an excellent reason to fleece those morons.

  9. #8
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Brian Anderson...very interesting target.

    I'm guessing the Marlins are too dumb to realize they won't be contending soon enough for Anderson to help them, but he would be an excellent reason to fleece those morons.
    Anderson would be a terrific pick up since he would give us the flexibility to play him in spots other than 3rd base if either Riley or Camargo decide to become competent players.

  10. #9
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,069
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,342
    Thanked in
    3,364 Posts
    I would be onboard for an Anderson trade. It would be a steep price though. Even with the fish being dumb.
    Coppy

  11. #10
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bravesfanMatt View Post
    I would be onboard for an Anderson trade. It would be a steep price though. Even with the fish being dumb.
    He's projected for 2.2 wins next year, but I think it'd be fair to valuate him at 3 wins for all four of his remaining contract years to get to 12 wins. He'll probably make around 40 million in arbitration, so 96-40=56 million dollar valuation on him. Given the Marlins are dumb, I would offer them a package in the 40-45 million dollar range on the off chance that they would bite. They seem to value those high risk high reward types of prospects. The types of guys with big flashy tools, but questions surrounding their hit tool. So maybe they would overvalue a guy like Riley and take a package of him plus a 45 FV arm or a 40 FV bat.

  12. #11
    Mr. Free Trade
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,139
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    470
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    834
    Thanked in
    514 Posts
    Arenado anyone? Has Opt out after 21 and is owed $35M/pretty much every year....

    N/M see it now in the other thread. Responses about like I thought.
    Last edited by Horsehide Harry; 12-11-2019 at 03:55 PM.

  13. #12
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,270
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    772
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,700
    Thanked in
    1,991 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Horsehide Harry View Post
    Arenado anyone? Has Opt out after 21 and is owed $35M/pretty much every year....

    N/M see it now in the other thread. Responses about like I thought.
    Yeah he has an opt out, not the club. That means if he sucks outside of Coors, tough crap. AA has shown he won't do a long term contract like that so why in the world would he trade big prospects to acquire an awful long term contract?? If he was going to go that route, he'd be just giving Rendon that money and keeping the prospects.

  14. #13
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,368
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,806
    Thanked in
    2,448 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PawPawMaxwell View Post
    Response to Ricos post. Not sure about rumors to move Castillo but all else checks about Reds. Moose is better at 3d, need pitching bad, want to contend, so I am going to play along with the block buster idea and change the package a bit. Braves get Castillo and Saurez.
    Send to Reds: Folty, Fried, Wright, Waters, Camargo and Riley. But only RIley after/if AA signs Ozuna or other cOF. Money wise the trade packages are a wash, leaves room for that cOf or a 5th starter
    Working on your idea, the Reds need plenty of OF help, and assuming they don't want Duvall back, I can see the Braves making them eat Inciarte's contract in return for getting a boatload of prospect. Still think Contreras is a valid bargaining chip also.

  15. #14
    Director of Minor League Reports rico43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,368
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    887
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,806
    Thanked in
    2,448 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PawPawMaxwell View Post
    Response to Ricos post. Not sure about rumors to move Castillo but all else checks about Reds. Moose is better at 3d, need pitching bad, want to contend, so I am going to play along with the block buster idea and change the package a bit. Braves get Castillo and Saurez.
    Send to Reds: Folty, Fried, Wright, Waters, Camargo and Riley. But only RIley after/if AA signs Ozuna or other cOF. Money wise the trade packages are a wash, leaves room for that cOf or a 5th starter
    It was a legit reporter on Twitter refer Castillo.

  16. #15
    Boras' Client
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    528
    Thanked in
    406 Posts
    There will be a big trade, and it will likely be for someone we haven’t even discussed lol.

  17. #16
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    26,461
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,026
    Thanked in
    6,129 Posts
    Arenado carries roughly zero surplus value. He could make sense depending on how much cash the Rox are willing to eat for a prospect like Riley.

  18. #17
    Steve Harvey'd
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    19,069
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,858
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,342
    Thanked in
    3,364 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Enscheff View Post
    Arenado carries roughly zero surplus value. He could make sense depending on how much cash the Rox are willing to eat for a prospect like Riley.
    Hmm. Maybe have the Rox kick in 40- 50 million total and the Braves split that over 20 and 21s payroll to basically cover Freeman’s contract. Now you have your long term 3rd baseman and have payroll in check for the next 2 years.
    Coppy

Similar Threads

  1. A few legit talents below the radar (and Top 30)
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-04-2017, 10:37 AM
  2. Under the radar prospects you are excited/want to see more of this year?
    By Preacher in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-04-2017, 08:27 AM
  3. Coming soon: A blockbuster. Maybe two.
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 08-31-2016, 06:09 PM
  4. Changes Are A Coming...
    By clvclv in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-20-2016, 04:25 PM
  5. Bowman: Burnett officially on Braves' radar
    By rico43 in forum 2024: The Campaign to Re-Elect Snit for Four More Years and Make Atlanta Great Again!
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-02-2016, 05:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •