Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Braves Put 5 on MLB Pipeline's Top 100

  1. #1
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts

    Braves Put 5 on MLB Pipeline's Top 100

    Never been a fan of Pipeline, but they have five Braves in their preseason top 100.

    Pache at 13
    Waters at 26
    Anderson at 37
    Wright at 52
    Langeliers at 70

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BeanieAntics For This Useful Post:

    Carp (01-27-2020), jpx7 (01-25-2020)

  3. #2
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,451
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,403
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,757
    Thanked in
    1,985 Posts
    I'm genuinely surprised that Muller didn't make this list and likely won't make the Fangraphs top 100 either. I know the walks were high in 2019, but he has electric stuff, is a tall lefty, and the overall results are very good. And it's on the heels of a very good 2018 that saw him dominate at 3 different levels and leads me to believe at least part of the BB issue this year is due to trying to develop his secondary pitches rather than simply control issues. He has a good pedigree as well, as a 2nd round pick. It just seems very odd to me that there isn't more buzz about him.

  4. #3
    10 yr, $185 million Extension
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,596
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    190
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    857
    Thanked in
    609 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    I'm genuinely surprised that Muller didn't make this list and likely won't make the Fangraphs top 100 either. I know the walks were high in 2019, but he has electric stuff, is a tall lefty, and the overall results are very good. And it's on the heels of a very good 2018 that saw him dominate at 3 different levels and leads me to believe at least part of the BB issue this year is due to trying to develop his secondary pitches rather than simply control issues. He has a good pedigree as well, as a 2nd round pick. It just seems very odd to me that there isn't more buzz about him.
    Agreed - have you seen him pitch ? He toys with guys like he knows he is too good to be at that level and appears to be working on change and and slider - super polite and humble - he and VV are gonna be super stars if health stays up

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Hulavol For This Useful Post:

    Carp (01-27-2020)

  6. #4
    It's OVER 5,000! Tapate50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    24,419
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9,085
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,708
    Thanked in
    3,895 Posts
    There are usually pitchers who step up from the teens every year and make a name for themselves as their development rolls into more of a finished product. Muller is exactly a candidate for that.
    Ivermectin Man

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tapate50 For This Useful Post:

    Carp (01-27-2020), jpx7 (01-27-2020)

  8. #5
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    I'm genuinely surprised that Muller didn't make this list and likely won't make the Fangraphs top 100 either. I know the walks were high in 2019, but he has electric stuff, is a tall lefty, and the overall results are very good. And it's on the heels of a very good 2018 that saw him dominate at 3 different levels and leads me to believe at least part of the BB issue this year is due to trying to develop his secondary pitches rather than simply control issues. He has a good pedigree as well, as a 2nd round pick. It just seems very odd to me that there isn't more buzz about him.
    I'd put Muller in front of Langeliers at this point, especially considering Langeliers less than inspired first taste of professional ball.

    I'll be interested to see how this list changes next year. If Langeliers shows that his slow pro start was the result of an extremely long season and he starts raking then he could jump up the list. Schewmake could make an appearance as well. If Muller shows better control I'd expect him on there as well.

  9. #6
    Anytime Now Frankie...
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    1,398
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    380
    Thanked in
    268 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    I'd put Muller in front of Langeliers at this point, especially considering Langeliers less than inspired first taste of professional ball.

    I'll be interested to see how this list changes next year. If Langeliers shows that his slow pro start was the result of an extremely long season and he starts raking then he could jump up the list. Schewmake could make an appearance as well. If Muller shows better control I'd expect him on there as well.
    I'm not sure I'd call a C in his first season as a pro putting up a 92 wRC+ in single-A uninspiring. It doesn't blow your doors off, but it's still pretty good for the position and experience level.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Snowman For This Useful Post:

    JohnAdcox (01-27-2020), jpx7 (01-27-2020)

  11. #7
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    I'm not sure I'd call a C in his first season as a pro putting up a 92 wRC+ in single-A uninspiring. It doesn't blow your doors off, but it's still pretty good for the position and experience level.
    For a top 10 college bat, you expect a bit more. A .255 BA with a .325 BABIP isn't great. Nor is 2 HRs in 239 PA.

    However, it's hard to draw any conclusions from what he did last year. College players often wear down in their draft year. Their season starts in mid-Feb so by August they tend to be sucking fumes. This is doubly true of catchers. All in all, I'd have a hard time putting him ahead of Muller without him showing me something in pro ball.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-27-2020)

  13. #8
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    I'm not sure I'd call a C in his first season as a pro putting up a 92 wRC+ in single-A uninspiring. It doesn't blow your doors off, but it's still pretty good for the position and experience level.
    Yeah I'm still pretty low on Langeliers and I hate taking that particular player type with a top 10 pick, but his pro debut was fine. Not great, but fine.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to BeanieAntics For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-27-2020)

  15. #9
    NL Rookie of the Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,480
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    762
    Thanked in
    517 Posts
    I've seen Muller as much as most and enough to say that he is about right here regardless of Langeliers. Muller is almost there. He certainly is very good but I wouldn't say he "toys with guys.". He is figuring out how to set guys up and not depend on pure stuff or over throwing. His ranking is not indicative of where he can go or get to but I'm in the camp that says this year will set him apart.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Deester11 For This Useful Post:

    Carp (01-28-2020), jpx7 (01-28-2020)

  17. #10
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,256
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    771
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,697
    Thanked in
    1,988 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    I'd put Muller in front of Langeliers at this point, especially considering Langeliers less than inspired first taste of professional ball.

    I'll be interested to see how this list changes next year. If Langeliers shows that his slow pro start was the result of an extremely long season and he starts raking then he could jump up the list. Schewmake could make an appearance as well. If Muller shows better control I'd expect him on there as well.
    Not sure I'd be too worried about Shea... he went straight from the draft to A ball. He struggled mightily at first, yes... but in his last 20 games he obviously adjusted:

    Last 20 games of 2019:

    .338/.391/.400 with a 135 wRC+

    So he kinda already did start raking (albeit with less power than we hope to see but it should come as he gets further removed from hamate bone surgery)

  18. #11
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Not sure I'd be too worried about Shea... he went straight from the draft to A ball. He struggled mightily at first, yes... but in his last 20 games he obviously adjusted:

    Last 20 games of 2019:

    .338/.391/.400 with a 135 wRC+

    So he kinda already did start raking (albeit with less power than we hope to see but it should come as he gets further removed from hamate bone surgery)
    I'm not worried about Shea at all at this point. Like I said, it was a looooooong season for him last year. It's more that I'd need a reason to rank him higher than Muller at this point and he didn't provide that reason last year.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-28-2020)

  20. #12
    Arbitration Eligible
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,171
    Thanked in
    773 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Not sure I'd be too worried about Shea... he went straight from the draft to A ball. He struggled mightily at first, yes... but in his last 20 games he obviously adjusted:

    Last 20 games of 2019:

    .338/.391/.400 with a 135 wRC+

    So he kinda already did start raking (albeit with less power than we hope to see but it should come as he gets further removed from hamate bone surgery)
    I'm really excited to see Shea and Braden in person next year at AA Mississippi and also to get some more reports on Langeliers defensive prowess. How good Shea is defensively is going to give us an idea of how good his offense needs to be to succeed. I really wish that there was publicly available framing data for minor league catchers.

    I'm still very skeptical of Shea long term, but I'll admit that if his defense is as good as it has been reported, he doesn't need to do much to be a valuable player. If he could establish himself as a consistent .750 OPS kind of guy, that'd probably be enough for him to be really valuable. I just don't really trust the scouting reports available on catcher defense until a player hits the majors or maybe AAA. There is still too much focus on their blocking/throwing ability and not enough on their framing.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to BeanieAntics For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-28-2020)

  22. #13
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    So who's our breakout candidate that might rocket into the top 100? I'm not talking about guys you could already argue belong on the list (like Muller or Shewmake). Who's the guy who is not even in consideration for the top 100 that might break out and be on this list this time next year?

  23. #14
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,451
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,403
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,757
    Thanked in
    1,985 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    So who's our breakout candidate that might rocket into the top 100? I'm not talking about guys you could already argue belong on the list (like Muller or Shewmake). Who's the guy who is not even in consideration for the top 100 that might break out and be on this list this time next year?
    Davidson clearly is tracking upward, but he's sort of obvious. Among names that aren't as obvious, I'd go De La Cruz. He has one of the best sliders in all of the minors and a good fastball as well. He could fly up prospect lists with a big year this year.

    Among hitters, you'd have to go with either Vaughn Grissom or Michael Harris considering they are super young, play premium positions, and show good offensive potential. A big year from either one would have them sitting Top 100 this time next year.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Carp For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2020)

  25. #15
    It's OVER 5,000!
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    8,025
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,467
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,951
    Thanked in
    1,360 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    So who's our breakout candidate that might rocket into the top 100? I'm not talking about guys you could already argue belong on the list (like Muller or Shewmake). Who's the guy who is not even in consideration for the top 100 that might break out and be on this list this time next year?
    i'm a Paolini truther
    "Well, you’ll learn soon enough that this was a massive red wave landslide." - thethe on the 2020 election that trump lost bigly

    “I can’t fix my life, but I can fix the world.” - sturg

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Super For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2020)

  27. #16
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,256
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    771
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,697
    Thanked in
    1,988 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Carp View Post
    Davidson clearly is tracking upward, but he's sort of obvious. Among names that aren't as obvious, I'd go De La Cruz. He has one of the best sliders in all of the minors and a good fastball as well. He could fly up prospect lists with a big year this year.

    Among hitters, you'd have to go with either Vaughn Grissom or Michael Harris considering they are super young, play premium positions, and show good offensive potential. A big year from either one would have them sitting Top 100 this time next year.
    Don't forget Backstrom... he's my guy. I know he's not a premium position guy but his offensive ceiling is about as high as they go.

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2020)

  29. #17
    It's OVER 5,000! striker42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,634
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    388
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,199
    Thanked in
    2,048 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zbhargrove View Post
    Don't forget Backstrom... he's my guy. I know he's not a premium position guy but his offensive ceiling is about as high as they go.
    Backstrom is the kind of lottery ticket I like. He's a big guy who could end up massive and has a super high ceiling with the bat. Huge bust potential but I like stockpiling guys like this because when they hit, they can hit big.

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to striker42 For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2020)

  31. #18
    It's OVER 5,000! zbhargrove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bismarck, ND
    Posts
    11,256
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    771
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,697
    Thanked in
    1,988 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    Backstrom is the kind of lottery ticket I like. He's a big guy who could end up massive and has a super high ceiling with the bat. Huge bust potential but I like stockpiling guys like this because when they hit, they can hit big.
    Especially since he was considered a first round guy until his senior year

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zbhargrove For This Useful Post:

    jpx7 (01-29-2020), UNCBlue012 (01-29-2020)

  33. #19
    Very Flirtatious, but Doubts What Love Is. jpx7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,907
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    47,781
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,442
    Thanked in
    3,830 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by striker42 View Post
    So who's our breakout candidate that might rocket into the top 100? I'm not talking about guys you could already argue belong on the list (like Muller or Shewmake). Who's the guy who is not even in consideration for the top 100 that might break out and be on this list this time next year?
    I’d go Michael Harris, because he has huge potential and athleticism, performed well in his inaugural professional stint, and (perhaps most important for rankings purposes) had a much higher draft position relative to other “breakout” candidates.
    "For all his tattooings he was on the whole a clean, comely looking cannibal."

  34. #20
    Expects Yuge Games nsacpi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    47,534
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,704
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11,387
    Thanked in
    7,536 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jpx7 View Post
    I’d go Michael Harris, because he has huge potential and athleticism, performed well in his inaugural professional stint, and (perhaps most important for rankings purposes) had a much higher draft position relative to other “breakout” candidates.
    Shewmake is the one I'd keep an eye on. Tarnok among the pitchers.
    Last edited by nsacpi; 01-30-2020 at 10:33 AM.
    "I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."

    "I am your retribution."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •