Sturg says ICU bed occupancy numbers are always in the 90% it's nothing new, study says otherwise, and you think it's somehting else?
The study was done about where ICU occupancy and Ventilators but also talks about ICU capacity. Like literally I copy and pasted from the article.
Literally it refutes sturgs claim of "ICU numbers are always around 90% even before covid." because at least in this hefty survey they weren't
Does that spell it out clearly for you?
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
I will first say that I didn't read the dates on the study so that is obviously my fault.
However, the study did show that ICU rate is relatively consistent and was pretty close to 80% the whole period. The study is also at a time when America was less fat since we know obesity rates are increasing.
So while I have to eat crow on what my initial comments towards you this study is still not showing what you want it to show.
Natural Immunity Croc
No, it peaked at 80%. The mean was about 69% and that's based on hourly not anything else.
Yes it is showing what I want it to show. Dig into it more. Almost 1/5 of those ICU beds were occupied by elective surgeries. Something we know wasn't super large in the COVID world. So COVID was not only exceeding the normal bed capacity but doing it with less elective surgery recovery space.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
I haven't pulled that up. I wasn't trying to argue that point. I was simply putting sturg's off the cuff comment to bed.
Right now we can look at this information
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/hos...on-7-day-trend
See that since 9.20 that the lowest ICU% were in the high 60s
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
I just flew back from my sister’s wedding across the country. About a week and a half ago, myself, my parents, and a couple of other family members had close contact and a long exposure to someone who tested positive. One other person ended up getting infected and couldn’t make the wedding. The rest of us (all vaccinated) avoided infection and weren’t forced to miss a once in a lifetime (hopefully…lol) family event.
Would we have avoided catching covid without the vaccine? Maybe. But you can bet we’re all thankful we were vaccinated and gave ourselves a better chance at staying healthy.
Natural immunity may provide better protection, but it also has no regard for your personal schedule.
I guess I take issue with the “really should not be” portion of your post…
The thing is that you achieve herd immunity through 2 means. Massive death, massive isolation, or combination of vaccine and natural immunity. If given time the vaccine will mutate to get more people infected. That's what the Delta variant is, it got past the initial hurdles the virus had to overcome.
Stockholm, more densely populated than NYC - sturg
You’re entitled to that choice.
I’m just playing the odds that are in my demographics favor.
I spent hours in Chinatown during lunar new year in 2020 because I know what my body can do. I take good care of it.
As a species we have always defeated viruses like this through herd immunity primarily obtained via normal exposure. With the waning efficacy of the vaccine it’s almost impossible to achieve herd immunity because of the staggering in when people are gettting their jabs.
Natural Immunity Croc
One small inconvenient detail about natural immunity. We have by now quite a bit of knowledge about other coronoviruses. And the immunity they generate tends to be short. 6-12 months. We already know of situations where the same person has gotten covid twice.
Perhaps related to the above there is an accumulating body of data that people who have previously contracted covid are more likely to get it than people who have been vaccinated.
Last edited by nsacpi; 10-05-2021 at 06:28 PM.
"I am a victim, I will tell you. I am a victim."
"I am your retribution."