Race

[cajunrevenge]

Kamala is unpopular because she comes off as a cunt whi will do anything to get a promotion. It would be nice to have a Democratic nominee that actually wants to win though, Jim Crow Joe and Hillary did everything possible to try and lose.

[Runnin]

Kamala is unpopular because she comes off as a cunt whi will do anything to get a promotion. It would be nice to have a Democratic nominee that actually wants to win though, Jim Crow Joe and Hillary did everything possible to try and lose.

That's a rather misogynistic take on her character. Anything specific you've noticed? I've never felt that way about her although I do assume she's ambitious. She's a politician. First and foremost she's trying to appeal to people/voters but she's clearly more progressive than her boss.

I agree she comes off as the browner version of Hillary, meaning obviously fake. She didn't help that image any when she began whispering and speaking quietly, ala Biden, which I assumed was a direct "request" from the WH. That's when I grew tired of the shtick.

[cajunrevenge]

You could start with what she said about Biden during the primaries then accepting the VP spot from him. Her record as prosecutor especially with marijuana where she acts like she has always been okay with it. She is telling us she prosecuted people who she knew damn well did nothing wrong. How many of those were black people that she personally had a role in putting in chains. Instead of fighting the good fight she stepped on any and everyone she could. Who cares what happened to those nobodies she is gonna be President someday! I dont agree with AoC much but she atleast comes off much better imo. But with Kamala, I believe she is smart enough to take the easy win that is legalization. So she would get my vote. Whatever happened to Biden being a trojan horse to get her to be President? Yet another hoax by the retarded right that they want to forget about.

[striker42]

It's very difficult to be a DA in a major city and simultaneously be someone deserving of being nominated to be President, much less winning. My experience with DA's is that they'll gladly lock someone up they know is innocent as long as it makes their numbers look good which they can tout in a re-election bid. Everything I've read about Kamala shows she fit that mold as DA exactly.

[Krgrecw]

That's a rather misogynistic take on her character. Anything specific you've noticed? I've never felt that way about her although I do assume she's ambitious. She's a politician. First and foremost she's trying to appeal to people/voters but she's clearly more progressive than her boss.

I agree she comes off as the browner version of Hillary, meaning obviously fake. She didn't help that image any when she began whispering and speaking quietly, ala Biden, which I assumed was a direct "request" from the WH. That's when I grew tired of the shtick.

Don’t discount her obviously fake stores of ‘fweedom’ and celebrating Kwanzaa before it was a thing

[thethe]

Don’t discount her obviously fake stores of ‘fweedom’ and celebrating Kwanzaa before it was a thing

Listening to Tupac before he came out.....

[Krgrecw]

Listening to Tupac before he came out.....

It’s evident that she’s so out of touch with black people that she lies about black culture trying to fit in and be accepted by them


And the sad thing is, they fall for it and think she’s one of them. She’s not.

[goldfly]

It’s evident that she’s so out of touch with black people that she lies about black culture trying to fit in and be accepted by them
And the sad thing is, they fall for it and think she’s one of them. She’s not.

You tell em krg

I can’t think of anyone better than krgrecw to tell black people how to feel and who is truly black and who isnt

I mean, thethe is a close 2nd

But your racist dumbass certainly should go around talking down to the dumb people to tell them truly who is part of their culture and who isn’t

[acesfull86]

https://libguides.umn.edu/c.php?g=10...apper-29849305

^ via the University of Minnesota, a helpful guide for those who want to conduct anti-racist research

FYI …public service announcement …the following things are now racist:

1) data
2) statistics
3) Google
4) library catalog systems
5) scholarly research
6) the term “minorities”

[sturg33]

You tell em krg

I can’t think of anyone better than krgrecw to tell black people how to feel and who is truly black and who isnt

I mean, thethe is a close 2nd

But your racist dumbass certainly should go around talking down to the dumb people to tell them truly who is part of their culture and who isn’t

As opposed to a bunch white liberal academics telling us what it is.

Remember when they created the term "Latinx"

Lol

[Jaw]

https://libguides.umn.edu/c.php?g=10...apper-29849305

^ via the University of Minnesota, a helpful guide for those who want to conduct anti-racist research

FYI …public service announcement …the following things are now racist:

1) data
2) statistics
3) Google
4) library catalog systems
5) scholarly research
6) the term “minorities”

What happened to "trust the experts?"

Acknowledge that scholarly publishing is racist
Peer review in the publication process is meant to ensure rigid methodology and low bias in what gets published, but that system is flawed. According to the Association for Psychological Science, Murray et al., and Lee & Low Books, most editors are white and/or from Western nations (links to articles below). Lee & Low Books and Wu report that 66-80% of peer reviewers are also white (links to articles below). These gatekeepers control the authorship and content of scholarly journals and books, which ultimately favor white, Western authors - even in works focused on race

[Jaw]

I guess it's a hierarchy.
Right wingers < white left wingers < intersectionality points (as long as they're left wingers)

[acesfull86]

As opposed to a bunch white liberal academics telling us what it is.

Remember when they created the term "Latinx"

Lol

Not to mention the white POTUS, who shared his thoughts on who is or isn’t really black during the campaign

[cajunrevenge]

What happened to "trust the experts?"

Acknowledge that scholarly publishing is racist
Peer review in the publication process is meant to ensure rigid methodology and low bias in what gets published, but that system is flawed. According to the Association for Psychological Science, Murray et al., and Lee & Low Books, most editors are white and/or from Western nations (links to articles below). Lee & Low Books and Wu report that 66-80% of peer reviewers are also white (links to articles below). These gatekeepers control the authorship and content of scholarly journals and books, which ultimately favor white, Western authors - even in works focused on race

who said these people were experts on anything?

[Tapate50]

The new good ol boy system

[acesfull86]

Know that librarians are advocating for anti-racist cataloging, a long-term process..

————

I’m going to sleep easier tonight, that’s for sure

[Tapate50]

Know that librarians are advocating for anti-racist cataloging, a long-term process..

————

I’m going to sleep easier tonight, that’s for sure

It’s about damn time

[goldfly]

Just being racist straight to the faces of people while being in Congress


Man, the maga folks really have made us a better country

[sturg33]

but she is a communist. her race has nothing to do with it

[Jaw]

Just being racist straight to the faces of people while being in Congress


Man, the maga folks really have made us a better country

Read this quote:

“Say what you will about old USSR, there was no gender pay gap there. Market doesn’t always ‘know best.’”

Then skim this paper, titled The People's Ledger of all things, and you will see why it has nothing to do with intersectionality points
https://lpeproject.org/wp-content/up...ger.DRAFT_.pdf