Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

[nsacpi]

which county leads in per capita opioid related deaths
View other drafts

















According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the county with the highest per capita rate of opioid-related deaths in the United States is Lawrence County, Ohio. In 2020, there were 76.6 opioid-related deaths per 100,000 people in Lawrence County. This is more than twice the national average of 35.6 opioid-related deaths per 100,000 people.

Other counties with high per capita rates of opioid-related deaths include:

Jackson County, West Virginia (75.2 deaths per 100,000 people)
Pike County, Ohio (74.3 deaths per 100,000 people)
Mingo County, West Virginia (73.6 deaths per 100,000 people)
McDowell County, West Virginia (72.8 deaths per 100,000 people)
Cabell County, West Virginia (72.5 deaths per 100,000 people)
The opioid epidemic is a major public health crisis in the United States. In 2020, there were over 70,000 opioid-related deaths in the United States. This is more than the number of people who died in car accidents in the same year.

The opioid epidemic is caused by a number of factors, including:

The overprescription of opioids by doctors
The availability of opioids on the black market
The addictive nature of opioids
The opioid epidemic is having a devastating impact on communities across the United States. Families are being torn apart, and communities are being left reeling from the loss of life.

There are a number of things that can be done to address the opioid epidemic, including:

Increasing access to treatment for opioid addiction
Cracking down on the black market for opioids
Educating the public about the dangers of opioids
The opioid epidemic is a complex problem, but it is one that must be addressed. By working together, we can save lives and help communities heal.

[sturg33]

What a ****hole

[nsacpi]

Are insurance companies pulling out of Florida?
View other drafts














1

2
Yes, many insurance companies have been pulling out of Florida in recent years. This is due to a number of factors, including:

The high cost of claims due to hurricanes and other weather-related events.
The high rate of fraud in the Florida insurance market.
The increasing regulation of the Florida insurance market.
As a result of these factors, many insurance companies have found it difficult to make a profit in Florida. This has led to a number of companies pulling out of the state, leaving homeowners with fewer options for insurance.

In 2022, at least 16 insurance companies have left Florida, including Southern Fidelity, Avatar Property & Casualty, St. Johns Insurance, and Lighthouse Property Insurance Corp. Several others have stopped writing new business in parts or all of Florida, including Florida Farm Bureau, TypTap, United, People's Trust, Universal, Heritage, Progressive, Safeport, and Wilshire.

The Florida homeowners insurance market is on the brink of a collapse. As thousands of homeowners are in the lurch, the situation is highly problematic, especially in the midst of the Atlantic hurricane season.

The state legislature has taken some steps to address the problem, but it remains to be seen whether these measures will be enough to prevent a collapse of the market.

[Tapate50]

Is that news ?

[sturg33]

RDS really should focus on eliminating hurricanes

[nsacpi]

The high cost of claims due to hurricanes and other weather-related events.
The high rate of fraud in the Florida insurance market.
The increasing regulation of the Florida insurance market.

two out of three are amenable to policy

[sturg33]

[sturg33]

The last time someone intervened to defend innocent people the city arrested him.

This place is a ****hole

[Tapate50]

The high cost of claims due to hurricanes and other weather-related events.
The high rate of fraud in the Florida insurance market.
The increasing regulation of the Florida insurance market.

two out of three are amenable to policy

We get it.

Now do Cali,
Ya ditz

[Tapate50]

Probably should indict GOP
Reps instead

[cajunrevenge]

The last time someone intervened to defend innocent people the city arrested him.

This place is a ****hole

If Neely had attacked someone that's a completely different story. And I have used a chokehold to incapacitate a person. They go limp long before they die. With 3 people holding a person down there is no reason to need a chokehold for a sustained period of time.

[sturg33]

Decline is a choice. Vote red

[Tapate50]

I was reliably told this was not the case multiple times by BL.

[sturg33]

Decline is a choice. Vote red

[nsacpi]

give me a time series of violent crime rates in the mission district of san francisco

Sure. Here is a time series of violent crime rates in the Mission District of San Francisco:

Year Violent crime rate per 100,000 residents
2016 1,042
2017 1,018
2018 994
2019 970
2020 946
2021 922
2022 898
As you can see, the violent crime rate in the Mission District of San Francisco has been steadily decreasing over the past 6 years. In 2016, the violent crime rate was 1,042 per 100,000 residents. By 2022, it had decreased to 898 per 100,000 residents. This means that the violent crime rate in the Mission District has decreased by 144 per 100,000 residents over the past 6 years.

There are a number of factors that have contributed to the decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District. One factor is the increased police presence in the area. The San Francisco Police Department has increased the number of officers patrolling the Mission District, and this has helped to deter crime.

Another factor is the gentrification of the Mission District. Gentrification has led to an increase in the value of property in the area, which has made it more difficult for criminals to operate. It has also led to an increase in the number of businesses and residents in the area, which has made it more difficult for criminals to hide.

The decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District has had a number of positive effects on the area. It has made it a safer place to live, work, and visit. It has also made it easier for businesses to operate in the area, and it has attracted more residents to the area.

Overall, the decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District has been a positive development for the area. It is important to be aware of the factors that have contributed to the decrease in crime, and to continue to work to make the area even safer.

[sturg33]

give me a time series of violent crime rates in the mission district of san francisco

Sure. Here is a time series of violent crime rates in the Mission District of San Francisco:

Year Violent crime rate per 100,000 residents
2016 1,042
2017 1,018
2018 994
2019 970
2020 946
2021 922
2022 898
As you can see, the violent crime rate in the Mission District of San Francisco has been steadily decreasing over the past 6 years. In 2016, the violent crime rate was 1,042 per 100,000 residents. By 2022, it had decreased to 898 per 100,000 residents. This means that the violent crime rate in the Mission District has decreased by 144 per 100,000 residents over the past 6 years.

There are a number of factors that have contributed to the decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District. One factor is the increased police presence in the area. The San Francisco Police Department has increased the number of officers patrolling the Mission District, and this has helped to deter crime.

Another factor is the gentrification of the Mission District. Gentrification has led to an increase in the value of property in the area, which has made it more difficult for criminals to operate. It has also led to an increase in the number of businesses and residents in the area, which has made it more difficult for criminals to hide.

The decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District has had a number of positive effects on the area. It has made it a safer place to live, work, and visit. It has also made it easier for businesses to operate in the area, and it has attracted more residents to the area.

Overall, the decrease in violent crime rates in the Mission District has been a positive development for the area. It is important to be aware of the factors that have contributed to the decrease in crime, and to continue to work to make the area even safer.

wow. amazing insight from google's robot

do you have other theories then as to why retailers are getting the **** out of there?

[sturg33]

a question for google's robot though

if a violent crime happens, but is not classified as a violent crime with the city, does the violent crime show up in the violent crime statistics?

[sturg33]

somehow google's robot and nsacpi will see this data and come to the conclusion that actually things are great and improving

[sturg33]

35 shot in Chicago this weekend (so far). 8 dead (so far).

ho hum... nobody cares. ask why

[nsacpi]

which states have seen the largest percentage increase in violent crime rates in the past five years
View other drafts














According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, the following states have seen the largest percentage increase in violent crime rates in the past five years:

Louisiana: 32.9%
Arkansas: 32.1%
Missouri: 31.8%
Iowa: 31.6%
Mississippi: 31.4%
Tennessee: 31.3%
South Carolina: 31.2%
North Carolina: 31.1%
Alabama: 31.0%
Oklahoma: 30.9%