bravesfanforlife88 (02-05-2021), UNCBlue012 (02-05-2021)
Dodgers could still afford Turner if they wanted, but man they'd be massively over the luxury tax. Dodgers payroll right now is 234 million lol. Not sure who they're gonna try to shed, or they're just gonna say screw it and put it all in.
What about taking on AJ Pollock if the Dodgers ate some money on his deal?
Ozuna 70 percent to Rays per Mish, feels weird. If he's getting a 3-4 year deal, that just seems way out of the Rays way to do something like that. But hey, if they overpaid for him, what can you do.
Folty close to a deal with the Rangers. Major League contract
Get off my lawn!
Have the Dodgers fired Friedman yet?
$34 million per for a #3 starter? Wow!!!
Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...
Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?
No reason they can't trade higher-paid guys like Kelly and Jansen and use Urias and/or Gonsolin in the pen exclusively if they want to sign Turner - attach a prospect to either and someone will take a big chunk of their money.
Pretty sure they're not worried about the luxury tax in the least.
Has there EVER been a statement and question a certain someone should absolutely never have made and asked publicly more than...
Kinda pathetic to see yourself as a message board knight in shining armor. How impotent does someone have to be in real life to resort to playing hero on a message board?