zbhargrove
Well-known member
The Post has been considered one step away from a tabloid for a long time now and you know that. I've never once claimed the Times was a good source... they are just as ****ty the other way at this point.
2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
The Post has been considered one step away from a tabloid for a long time now and you know that. I've never once claimed the Times was a good source... they are just as ****ty the other way at this point.
Yeah - Its considered a tabloid by leftists.
They broke arguably the biggest story ever right before an election.
Continually labeling them a tabloid is your biggest tell of them all.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Kinda funny how the reporter didn't want his name on the story, huh?
Miranda Devine?
Some more gold from the guy that claims "I'm just waiting for more validation"
"If you believe this laptop story is legit, you are stupider than I even thought... this comes out right before an election with tons of red flags. Come on man, wake up. Although, you know exactly the BS you are spewing. You are a shameful human being."
"If you believe this laptop story is legit, you are stupider than I even thought... this comes out right before an election with tons of red flags. Come on man, wake up. Although, you know exactly the BS you are spewing. You are a shameful human being."
zbhargrove
Well-known member
I mean.. that response wasn't wrong... you throw everything at the wall hoping something will stick... sometimes it does
To top it off - The idiot shared a NPR article for his support:
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/17/9245...-scoop-driven-by-ex-hannity-producer-giuliani
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/17/9245...-scoop-driven-by-ex-hannity-producer-giuliani
This guy was definitely trying to keep an open mind throughout the process:
"Absolutely nothing weird going on here:
"Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer, said his own attorney, Robert Costello, obtained the material from the owner of a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware, after Hunter Biden allegedly left it there for months. Giuliani provided the material to the New York Post on Sunday, and the Post began running stories about the supposed documents this week.
But the owner of the computer store, John Paul MacIsaac, was unable and unwilling to answer key questions about how the laptop supposedly arrived in his store, and eventually, how the data was shared with Giuliani. CBS News interviewed MacIsaac for almost two hours on Wednesday and throughout the interview he contradicted himself about his motivations, raising questions about the truthfulness of one of the central figures in the story.""
"Absolutely nothing weird going on here:
"Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer, said his own attorney, Robert Costello, obtained the material from the owner of a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware, after Hunter Biden allegedly left it there for months. Giuliani provided the material to the New York Post on Sunday, and the Post began running stories about the supposed documents this week.
But the owner of the computer store, John Paul MacIsaac, was unable and unwilling to answer key questions about how the laptop supposedly arrived in his store, and eventually, how the data was shared with Giuliani. CBS News interviewed MacIsaac for almost two hours on Wednesday and throughout the interview he contradicted himself about his motivations, raising questions about the truthfulness of one of the central figures in the story.""
It gets better and better:
"There is no real evidence and it’s clear to anyone that has the most basic critical thinking skills. Why should I address a bunch of trash that has already been debunked widely. But I know you live in Q world so discussing facts is pointless since you tend to make up your own."
"There is no real evidence and it’s clear to anyone that has the most basic critical thinking skills. Why should I address a bunch of trash that has already been debunked widely. But I know you live in Q world so discussing facts is pointless since you tend to make up your own."
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Nothing about this article was wrong... there were tons of red flags at the time but you won't be honest about it... the article never says the laptop wasn't real... it says we needed more authentication which I think is fair considering the parties pushing the narrative and the fact that none of it was authenticated yet.
Yes - It needed more validation until the election was over.
We all know. You bought it hook line and sinker and you'll fall for the next hoax too.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Still a valid point... you do live in Q world
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Yes we know... if it's against Trump it's a hoax and if it's for him, no other digging needed. Your playbook in a nutshell.
Even if this was the playbook you’d be right almost every time.
But you run with the opposite which is why you’ve been wrong so many times in the past.
Remember, as you said the laptop story was a fake for anyone with critical thinking skills. Just wild you actually said that.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Nope... I said I wanted to wait for confirmation and there were red flags... we had no way of knowing at the time what was fake and what may have been altered considering it had been in so many hands before being turned over. And you know this.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
Spoken like a true zealot!!
Shockingly nothing was altered. Who would have thought!!!