2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
Tapate50
Well-known member
In NH?!
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
No one cares. A prosecutor being hard on prosecuting isn't that big of a deal. 1900 convictions in 7 years back in the DARE era isn't insane.
Like seriously who cares what she did 20 years ago if it wasn't illegal?
Like many people in america in the last 20 years we've seen that criminalization of weed is stupid. You act like it's settled facts for decades. Like when she was DA recreational weed was illegal in every state in the US. Some states had decrim but even that has clearly established limits.
Sadly conservatwats will see this point and harbor it even if they don't want that standard applied to Trump.
For example 20 years ago Trump wasn't pro-border wall, he derided Pat Buchanon for wanting it. Or how he faxed a statement to CBS before Buchanon went on saying it was important for Allies to stamp out Nazism, now he welcomes Nazis to walk hand and hand with his allies. I could go on. But yeah 20 years ago Trump decried David Duke, now he doesn't care if he supports him.
Obviously someone cares, or they wouldn't be going through the trouble of concealing information.
You just don't get it Zito. It has nothing to do with the actual candidate or their historical policy, as bad as it may be.. It has everything to do with the unethical (and potentially illegal, if Trump's hush money trial is any indication) concealing of public information in support of a political candidate during an election.
News outlets are editing articles from years ago to spin a new narrative about her. Historical data that was available a few short years (hell it might have been available a month ago for all we know) is now conveniently unavailable. Again, an example of the Dems calling for "saving the democracy" while simultaneously doing the exact things the are charging Trump for.
Projecting at it's finest.
Last edited:
Exactly. Only 1 party openly supports anti-Semitism. And it's not the Republicans.
Somewhat surprisingly strong performance by Harris here honestly. Wouldn’t be shocked if the news cycle keeps her around this up through the convention, but I don’t think she’s got the juice once she’s very openly campaigning.
Seriously, an assassination attempt happened, regardless of what hit his ear. Unless you’re an actual investigator trying to gather facts for future security or Trump’s doctor and need to know for some unknown ear reason, this is a detail that doesn’t need to be sorted out.
Yeah, just some shorthand wording there by me. She hasn’t done anything to earn that result yet.
I’d tend to agree, unless Harris’ team just pulls a rabbit out of a hat.
I’d have Trump at about an 80/20 to win against Harris personally. The only path I see for Harris winning is her campaign being genuinely effective at driving the youth vote, which is clearly their plan. But I just don’t see her as charismatic enough to pull that off.
I don’t think she’ll cause anywhere near the regional shift you’re expecting. She’ll either be effective as a candidate or not, in my opinion. I don’t think there are any swing races that will vary by much based on her candidacy.
I think the Dems and Harris can accept losing that group of voters, though. It’s already a demographic Trump was going to overwhelmingly win. The key will be how they combat that.
It won't matter if the Dems can't remove themselves from this anti-Semitic movement. It's already started with Bowman in NY. The vast majority of Americans side with Israel in the conflict and seeing our nation's capital being vandalized by left wingers is going to push these people to the right. They are honestly lucky the media coverage is so biased. If this were happening under Trump's watch, you wouldn't be able to get a break from it anywhere on the news.