2024 Field

sturg33 said:
All polls favorable to Trump are evidence of a landslide

All polls unfavorable to Trump are fake and simply observing it means "falling for it"

I don't want to bet on Trump losing Iowa... doing so would be monumental. But the predictions of a blowout are going to be wrong.

Ill let you know what my Kamala contracts price is on Monday morning
Click to expand...

Blowout
 
Forgive me y’all - I had to take a trip down memory lane after I saw the Seitzer news this AM.

Woof
 
312 EV, or basically a repeat of 2020 and 2016. The difference between MI and NV voting red instead of blue

BLOWOUT! I was promised 400!
 
sturg33 said:
312 EV, or basically a repeat of 2020 and 2016. The difference between MI and NV voting red instead of blue

BLOWOUT! I was promised 400!
Click to expand...

Yeah - definitely wasn’t a blowout that was deciddd early on election night.

Almost everyone has described 2024 as a blowout. Somehow you didn’t get the memo. Wonder if it has to do with your TDS.

Maybe you’re still worried about that Iowa poll that was super real!
 
thethe said:
Yeah - definitely wasn’t a blowout that was deciddd early on election night.

Almost everyone has described 2024 as a blowout. Somehow you didn’t get the memo. Wonder if it has to do with your TDS.

Maybe you’re still worried about that Iowa poll that was super real!
Click to expand...

Feels like a repeat of 2016 to me, which is what i predicted the day before

Popular vote was the big surprise to me, but then again Kamala was the worst candidate in human history so that gives me some hope.

Trump still didn't clear 50%
 
sturg33 said:
Feels like a repeat of 2016 to me, which is what i predicted the day before

Popular vote was the big surprise to me, but then again Kamala was the worst candidate in human history so that gives me some hope.

Trump still didn't clear 50%
Click to expand...

Hahahaha - you actually think it was anywhere as close to 2016.

Oh boy, looks like that TDS will take far longer to heal.

You may be the only serious person that doesn’t think 2024 was a blowout.
 
thethe said:
Hahahaha - you actually think it was anywhere as close to 2016.

Oh boy, looks like that TDS will take far longer to heal.

You may be the only serious person that doesn’t think 2024 was a blowout.
Click to expand...

2024 was decisive. 2008 was a blowout. 2 swing states could have flipped 2024 to Kamala

In 2016 the GOP won the house and senate and the presidency and it was called that night. Think he got 306 EVs that night.

Good job getting 312 this time around, which is probably due to the census being more favorable
 
sturg33 said:
2024 was decisive. 2008 was a blowout. 2 swing states could have flipped 2024 to Kamala

In 2016 the GOP won the house and senate and the presidency and it was called that night. Think he got 306 EVs that night.

Good job getting 312 this time around, which is probably due to the census being more favorable
Click to expand...

Yes 2024 was in spite of massive ballot fraud. Something that existed in 2016 but not at this level.

But then you could also look at massive movements in all states towards Trump.

Again, nobody serious would categorize 2024 as anything but a blowout. Even leftist commentators begrudgingly admit it. Shame you can’t admit a basic reality.
 
thethe said:
Yes 2024 was in spite of massive ballot fraud. Something that existed in 2016 but not at this level.

But then you could also look at massive movements in all states towards Trump.

Again, nobody serious would categorize 2024 as anything but a blowout. Even leftist commentators begrudgingly admit it. Shame you can’t admit a basic reality.
Click to expand...

I guess we just have different definitions of the term "blowout."

Nixon, Regan, HW Bush, come to mind. But good job getting the 312 and the 49%. Certainly one of the best performance from republicans in decades
 
[tw]1857988405587476731[/tw]

It’s spectacular how bogus our election system is in this nation.

If we ever got full election reform I could only imagine the type of margins republicans would win by. Heck, even Romney may have beaten Obama without the fraud.
 
sturg33 said:
2024 was decisive. 2008 was a blowout. 2 swing states could have flipped 2024 to Kamala

In 2016 the GOP won the house and senate and the presidency and it was called that night. Think he got 306 EVs that night.

Good job getting 312 this time around, which is probably due to the census being more favorable
Click to expand...

Did you mean 3 states? Kamala wasn't making up 42 electoral votes on 2 states, unless Florida/Texas was 1 of those states.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top