I want aggressive action but in things that can actually get done. Abolish the filibuster now and pass voter security laws. It’s our only chance. Too many of our side of the isle knows of the fraud and tolerates it (probably in on it).
Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread
- Thread starter thethe
- Start date
That I agree there are circumstances in which we need to ensure people are removed from society, and that if someone’s mental health is being provided as a reason for a lesser sentence there should be better guardrails in place for that person to not immediately be back in society.
sturg33
I
Im just telling you what the solution is, and I agree we wont get there bc we choose to be nice and slowly kill ourselves to appease this group
You’ll get what you want over time - we just need to pass voter integrity measures now.
Woman were manipulated for decades by the globalist left. This doesn’t get undone with aggressive action. It has to happen organically.
sturg33
I
Every society in human history decided it was best to leave societal decision making to the people who build and maintain the society.
We decided to be nice and so we let 80 time arrested thugs free to kill again, we chop off the genitals of kids, and we block traffic to allow Somalian to steal billions from us
I’m not disagreeing with you here - want to get to a similar endpoint. We just have a difference in opinion the best way to get there.
sturg33
I
I understand. You want to take the nice route. If successful would take probably 50 years at least or undoing a lifetime of education and indoctrination and then would pray we dont find ourselves right back here after a media and university campaign of "hes literally Hitler!"
I want to take fast and smart approach. Say, "you people are amazing and critical to a thriving society, but you suicidal empathy inevitably leads us to self destruction. Therefore, you no longer have a say in how we move forward. Feel free to dress up in handsmaid tale outfits and hold up signs on the streets. If you'd like to engage in a war over this decision, please proceed... otherwise, sit down while we fix this"
My approach would actually work. Yours, sadly, will be nice but ineffective
I’m so glad we have you and thethe to hash out the details of whether we fix society by letting Trump rule all aspects of American life with an iron fist or by sending the women back to the kitchen.
Your way results in the exact opposite reaction with the added benefit of potential bloodshed.
sturg33
I
sturg33
I
A bunch of protests in red dresses and nsacpi and mqt and Jacob Frey marching?
Please... I'll take my chances. If they want an actual war, they will be dead. Because men build, maintain, and protect society. Women enjoy that privilege and they should continue to do so.
Instead, they have has much of a say as you do and today they say ICE is too mean and should be de-funded. Enjoy your illegals
sturg33
I
Mqt and women are philosophically alligned. Mean words!!
Communists have been training armed militias for decades. They’ll ally with the cartels and Islamic terror groups. I’m sorry but I think you’re woefully uninformed here
Glad I could help you two find common ground.
sturg33
I
Status quo it is, then
For the record, if only men voted Trump would have won 49 states.
Men make up 95% of police (but oddly, barely 60% of police chiefs)
Men make up 95% of the military
Men make up 99% of oil and gas
You get the point
I do get it. I have to work with the current chessboard to figure out a way to win. It’s not just lady men on their side.
acesfull86
Well-known member
I guess no one should vote, lol