Official off-season trade rumor and suggestion thread

Cubbies about to pick up Dexter Fowler for Luis Valbuena and Dan Straily. Not a bad exchange for the Astros.

Given the $$$ involved and the difference in talent and upside, Minor likely would've gotten it done alone. *ell, we could've offered to toss in $10 million if they'd have taken Johnson.
 
Here is a good article about the Scherzer signing, comparables, and contract discussion. (not final details)

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/nationals-build-potential-super-team-add-max-scherzer/

Let’s get back to Scherzer. He’s a definite ace, and an ace without a worrisome injury history. You already know him for his strikeouts, but he really excels in one area in particular. If you’re chasing against Max Scherzer, you know you’re in trouble, but if you’re not chasing, you might still be in trouble. Over the last three years, here’s the top five in lowest contact rates allowed on pitches in the strike zone:

1.Max Scherzer, 80.5% Z-contact%
2.R.A. Dickey, 80.7%
3.Matt Harvey, 83.0%
4.Justin Verlander, 83.6%
5.Matt Moore, 83.9%

It’s Scherzer, then a guy with a trick pitch, then a decent gap until the next regular arm. Scherzer finished second in baseball in 2012, behind Dickey. He finished first in 2013. And he finished second in 2014, behind Dickey. Scherzer doesn’t need for hitters to flail away to succeed — he’s strong enough with strikes, and he throws a lot of strikes.

And for what it’s worth, he’s done all this in the American League, and in the AL Central. In 2013, Scherzer’s average opponent had a 96 wRC+. Last year, his average opponent had a 100 wRC+. Two years ago, Jordan Zimmermann’s average opponent had an 89 wRC+. Last year, 91. Zimmermann works as a stand-in for most Nationals pitchers, here. Scherzer’s put up big numbers against higher-quality competition. Zimmermann’s been real good, and Strasburg has also been real good, but their numbers have largely come against relatively inferior competition, so that could be one more reason why the Nationals were willing to commit to Scherzer long-term. With Washington, he could reach another level. Alternatively, he could just have a more gradual decline.
 
Assuming they trade Zimmermann, I think this is the right move by Rizzo. Zimmermann, Fister, Desmond, Span are all FAs in 2016, so this is a preemptive move to bridge the gap. Long term deals for SP are always risky, but Scherzer has been more durable than the average bear. They have very good prospects that can back-fill Fister after 2015 (A. J. Cole) and Strasburg after 2016 (Lucas Giolito). The Yunel Escobar acquisition gives them a bridge between Desmond and top prospect Trea Turner.

The Nationals may be as talented as they'll ever be at this moment, but there won't be a significant drop-off in 2016 and 2017 on paper.

Have to assume Mr. Lerner made the Scherzer deal because he WANTS to win. Assuming that's the case, I wouldn't trade a soul.

1.) Escobar plays 2B this season and slides over to replace Desmond next year if Turner's not ready. You recoup the draft pick you lost for signing Scherzer.

2.) Giolito will be ready to replace Zimmerman in 2016. You get another draft pick.

3.) Michael Taylor will be ready to replace Span in 2016. You get another draft pick.

4.) Concentrate your efforts on extending Fister instead of Zimmerman (at a much lower figure). If he doesn't want to stay, you've got Roark A. J. Cole, and Erick Fedde waiting in the wings and you get yet ANOTHER draft pick.

5.) Wilmer Difo should be ready to take over 2B by late 2016, and if Turner's also ready you can trade Escobar for a prospect.
 
That's just an irresponsibly severe overpay, especially considering the 'mystery team' has yet to be identified, although I doubt the contract will ultimately impair the Nationals in any way.
 
Jeff Passan
@JeffPassan
Estimate of the net present value of Max Scherzer's $210M deal because of deferrals: $185M, or $26.4M AAV. Biggest deferral in MLB history.
 
Jeff Passan
@JeffPassan
Estimate of the net present value of Max Scherzer's $210M deal because of deferrals: $185M, or $26.4M AAV. Biggest deferral in MLB history.

That is at 1.7%, which seems awfully low to me, but I could be wrong on that. Inflation over the next 14 years will likely be over 1.7%. If you just said you expect baseball contract inflation to be 3%, then the NPV is $169,000,000.

Interesting way to configure contract. I wonder if that allows them to actually spend more in the short term since the contract is only on the books for 15 mil.
 
Jeff Passan

@JeffPassan

Estimate of the net present value of Max Scherzer's $210M deal because of deferrals: $185M, or $26.4M AAV. Biggest deferral in MLB history.

The big unknown, at this point, is how the Nats will account for this. If they're simply putting the deferral $ in escrow each year between 2015 and 2021, then they'll be done budgeting for Scherzer after 7 years. Otherwise, this deferral will impact their spending capability long after Scherzer is gone. If the latter, that is a questionable decision . . . even if just from a PR standpoint.
 
You can never have enough pitching...esepcially top notch pitching. Nothing in the game has changed in that respect.

you can have enough to justify not investing an additional $210M which has the potential to cripple you in as little as 3 years
 
Back
Top