REAL FOOTBALL Thread

[yeezus]

How good are Seattles WR's and TE's? Couldn't I say the same thing? Give Russell, Lucks weapons at WR and TE and he puts up more yards and they try to throw more.

Yeah, give him Luck's OL and run game and watch Russell crumble because he has to throw the ball 38+ times to win.
Luck also makes his weapons look better. Hilton is very good. Outside of that, he really doesn't have anything. Fleener? Allen? He makes those two, not the other way around. A completely broken down Wayne? Please. Yeah, give Luck Wilson's offense and he would ****.

 

[yeezus]

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Playing in the SB isn't having the weight of the world on your shoulders? Bwahahahahahhaa

The team never depends on Wilson. Ever. He's along for the ride. He never wins them games by himself. Ever. He'd be a complete mess on Luck's offense.

 

[yeezus]

Again: Wilson threw 4 picks in the NFCCG and still won because of how great the team around him is. A 1-4 TD-to-INT ratio for any other QB on any other team, and that team is getting blown out.

 

[sturg33]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...fateful-play-call-by-pete-carroll/?tid=pm_pop

Again - I understand the logic. I just don't agree with it.

 

[BRule]

Russell Wilson in 2 Super Bowls has a QB Rating of 117 with a 10 Y/A and 4 TD's to 1 INT. I don't need to bring up Lucks postseason numbers again, they aren't close.

 

[yeezus]

Lol. Round and round we go. Ignore everything and just use numbers.
Nick Foles went 27-2. OMG he's the greatest QB ever.

 

[BRule]

The team never depends on Wilson. Ever. He's along for the ride. He never wins them games by himself. Ever. He'd be a complete mess on Luck's offense.

Hyperbole much?

 

[BRule]

Lol. Round and round we go. Ignore everything and just use numbers.
Nick Foles went 27-2. OMG he's the greatest QB ever.

Sorry for thinking postseason and SB numbers are kinda relevant....MY BAD.

 

[yeezus]

Russell Wilson in 2 Super Bowls has a QB Rating of 117 with a 10 Y/A and 4 TD's to 1 INT. I don't need to bring up Lucks postseason numbers again, they aren't close.

He threw 4 picks and still won in the NFCCG.
His performance is largely inconsequential to that team. He does not drive them. Luck is all Indy has.

 

[yeezus]

Sorry for thinking postseason and SB numbers are kinda relevant....MY BAD.

Oh like 4 INTs in the NFCCG.

 

[BRule]

He threw 4 picks and still won in the NFCCG.
His performance is largely inconsequential to that team. He does not drive them. Luck is all Indy has.

Numbers don't lie

 

[yeezus]

Sorry for thinking postseason and SB numbers are kinda relevant....MY BAD.

Relevant? Ok. Be-all? Nope. Not when it comes to glorified bus drivers.

 

[BRule]

Oh like 4 INTs in the NFCCG.

Even with the 4 INTs his numbers are WAYYYYYYY better than Luck in the postseason.

 

[BRule]

Relevant? Ok. Be-all? Nope. Not when it comes to glorified bus drivers.

How come the Bears, TB and Baltimore didn't win SBs everywhere if it all it took was a "bus driver"?

 

[yeezus]

Even with the 4 INTs his numbers are WAYYYYYYY better than Luck in the postseason.

So you think Wilson would have the same numbers on Indy?

 

[BRule]

So you think Wilson would have the same numbers on Indy?

No, they would be better because he has actual WRs and TEs to throw to.

 

[yeezus]

How come the Bears, TB and Baltimore didn't win SBs everywhere if it all it took was a "bus driver"?

Flacco > Wilson. And Seattle's defense was much better than Baltimore's when Flacco won.
Seattle's defense is all-time great.

 

[yeezus]

No, they would be better because he has actual WRs and TEs to throw to.

LMAO

 

[yeezus]

Coby Fleener and Dwayne Allen are GODS. Luck has 1 WR and two average TEs that he makes better. No run game. No offensive line. No defense to continuously bail him out when he doesn't make plays.
I would love to see Luck on Seattle. He would rip people apart.

 

[yeezus]

Could Luck throw four INTs and still win a playoff game?