I guess it was too easy to just write.....BJ.
BJ was so bad he cost us Kimbrel. That is it. Great trade for the Braves but wish it didn't have to happen.
I think you could make the argument that Kimbrel for Wisler, the other dude, and the 41st pick, and saved money from Kimbrel's contract is a pretty fair value... The bad contract swap was just icing on the cake
I think you could make the argument that Kimbrel for Wisler, the other dude, and the 41st pick, and saved money from Kimbrel's contract is a pretty fair value... The bad contract swap was just icing on the cake
I would not have been happy with CK for Wisler, lottery pick OF years away and a pick. For CK I would have wanted at least 1 elite prospect. I live Wisler a lot. Some say he can be a 2. But for CK, without BJ, you want a stud. Wisler isn't a guy who people think will just dominate and miss a ton of bats.....at least now what I've read.
But with BJ's contract I think it's a great deal for the braves.
I agree, and still maintain that Maybin might be an additional few dollops of icing as well.
Still a bad trade. Fledibiity does the Braves nothing. It just allows them to acquire more over paid players.
I don't understand how we were able to get a top prospect in Wisler, Jordan Paroubeck, draft pick along with unloading BJ for Kimbrel. It was a fantastic trade.
Nobody is going to trade a Tajun Walker-type prospect for a closer who is making over $12M a year.