2016 Presidential Primaries [ SUPER TUESDAY | 3-1-'16]

why don't you "specifically" produce them. Because I don't recall anything involving the right to kill babies to raise money.
Attributable quotes or videos will do.

I am tired of the BS Pro Lifers put in peoples mouths
If you have an argument make it but try your very best to refrain from overly dramatic references.

I know, it's hard. It took me 79 tries before I got it right
 
57Brave said:
why don't you "specifically" produce them. Because I don't recall anything involving the right to kill babies to raise money.
Attributable quotes or videos will do.

I am tired of the BS Pro Lifers put in peoples mouths
If you have an argument make it but try your very best to refrain from overly dramatic references.

I know, it's hard. It took me 79 tries before I got it right
Click to expand...

I don't need to produce anything for you. As you often say... look it up

Edit- decided to give you a break. Took me about 10 seconds - approved by obama himself:

 
" Just like when every D candidate says that R will take away the ability for mothers to murder their children"

You get this statement out of that ad ?
 
Having said all that I can't wait for (D) to sensationalize whichever (R) candidate wins the primary that they are going to force incestuous raped women to have their babies. And I can't wait for the dumbasses who fall for it for it like always

Same goes for the other side
 
57Brave said:
I dont recall the scenario you paint. Will you link a (D) candidate making such a "rallying call"
Click to expand...

Everyone take note here... typical 57. Asks a direct question above. I do exactly as he asks... then turns it around into a whole different point. Ho hum
 
You posted no evidence of "every D candidate says that R will take away the ability for mothers to murder their children"

Your views abortion and mine differ -- but politically, what you said and what you showed are two totally different things.
And here we are again where you make no distinction between politics and policy. We can have an argument over the policies of abortion but not where we are talking about who is and isn't electable and why. Would you agree that muddles the conversation ? Kinda like talkng about the Braves and someone interjecting " well the Falcons ..."

Huckabee made an outlandish statement which goes contrary to public opinion. I would guess, being generous, 90-10%. You brought up a topic that is a) law of the land and b) 47-46% in Pro Choice favor. But, the point wasn't to discuss Huckabees point or even whether a medical procedure constitutes murder but to point out that the numbers are not in the favor of someone espousing the Huckabee mindset
 
57Brave said:
You posted no evidence of "every D candidate says that R will take away the ability for mothers to murder their children"
Click to expand...

The question you asked was:

I dont recall the scenario you paint. Will you link a (D) candidate making such a "rallying call"
 
You make a statement, he asked you to prove it, you went on to discuss a legal medical procedure. Of course abortion is a rallying cry of the democrats. Cause the republicans are so stupid to keep it being an issue. Just like republicans will be beating the drums about how Hilary or whomever wants to take away all their guns. The only difference is that the democrats are at least smart enough to not actively say they would take people's guns.
 
Christopher Hayes ‏@chrislhayes 14m14 minutes ago

Calling out absent fathers - while flying around the country running for President - days after your son was arrested, is some chutzpah.
 
zitothebrave said:
You make a statement, he asked you to prove it, you went on to discuss a legal medical procedure. Of course abortion is a rallying cry of the democrats. Cause the republicans are so stupid to keep it being an issue. Just like republicans will be beating the drums about how Hilary or whomever wants to take away all their guns. The only difference is that the democrats are at least smart enough to not actively say they would take people's guns.
Click to expand...

You make a statement, he asked you to prove it, you went on to discuss a legal medical procedure.
Click to expand...

Yeah - the statement was the Ds use abortion as a rallying call, even though it will never be changed. 57 asked me to show him an example, I had to go back exactly one election to find it.

Of course abortion is a rallying cry of the democrats.
Click to expand...

So you agree... cool
 
"Yeah - the statement was the Ds use abortion as a rallying call, even though it will never be changed. 57 asked me to show him an example, I had to go back exactly one election to find it."

Even if you are right - the DNC was answering a campaign promise by the opposition.
Hardly " every D candidate says that R will take away the ability for mothers to murder their children"


So, was Romney lying? This is where you get tangled in the difference between politics and policy , this makes it hard to discuss current events. Like I said earlier - we are talking about how the Braves construct a roster and you invoke the Falcons. Granted both are rosters but different ...

We still haven't seen the clip advocating the murdering children.
 
and the first actual democrat/liberal enters the field

Hope he gets the nomination. Bernie being President would be amazing for the status quo in this country
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top