Should he have informed the feds who have clearly proven to be completely partisan in their approach? If the evidence was clearly damning then due dilligence is what is required.
How could the trump campaign have confidence that the government would do the right thing. The same government that knew of the Russia involvement for months before election day and chose to do nothing.
Maybe it's because I don't see a difference between someone like Russia and an entity like the NYT or MSNBC.
the feds who have clearly proven to be completely partisan in their approach
Bless your poor, brainwashed down to your DNA heart.
Not that it matters, but here's a difference:
Russia wants to damage democracy and freedom. MSNBC and the NYT wants to preserve democracy and freedom.
A lot of lazy people do like the idea of voting for an authoritarian who they foolishly is just gonna fix all their problems. Being an informed voter is way too much work for most people.
They "chose to do nothing" because the candidate that won was bitching about the election being rigged for weeks leading up to the election in the event he had lost. So if they say, "Russia is tampering to benefit Trump," he can then just claim it's a conspiracy to help Hillary and people like you would accept it as fact.
Con-man Trump played both sides. He knew Russia was interfering and by claiming the election was rigged against him, he prevented the feds from saying anything of substance against him for fear of giving his claims validity. Had he just not hired Michael Flynn, like Obama said, he probably gets away with it all.
I don't believe that liberal/progressives believe in freedom. Or maybe we just define freedom differently.
Sad. Very sad. That you would equate the NYT and MSNBC with the KGB is beyond absurd.
Karen FinneyVerified account @finneyk 8h8 hours ago
How is it not treason to meet with a rep of hostile foreign government aimed at subverting the will of the American people?
How is it considered definitive that this person is in fact a rep of russia? Because some guy from Britain said it?
What is the KGB trying to do to the freedom's of americans? Because I can list out the ways the progressive left is trying to restrict mine.
man...u are way out there in the swamps of paranoia and delusion
Do you have an answer sir? Is the KGB going to invade the US? Is Putin going to be alive forever? I can tell you that the progressive left will outlast Putin.
And the KGB in some form or another will exist for a long time. You really don't know much about world history and the struggled relationship of Russia with the west do you?
I'm aware of world history. Not as much of a buff as I'm sure many of you are but tyranny begins in the form of a large centralized government in almost all situations. Progressivism and radical Islam is more of a threat to my everyday life than the boogeyman KGB.
No Russian soldier will ever step foot on American soil.
Do you have an answer sir? Is the KGB going to invade the US? Is Putin going to be alive forever? I can tell you that the progressive left will outlast Putin.
I would not make that bet. If resources go as scarce as they could, Alaska would work out as a nice annexation for Russia.
And I laugh at that first paragraph because Trump has espoused tyrannical views since the campaign trail. Yet you voted for him. And for ****s sake you propagate what he's sewing by bringing up media outlets when the only hope you have against tyranny is the media.