Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

cajunrevenge said:
Is manipulating foreign elections wrong or is it only when it happens to us? How many foreign elections do you think Hillary has manipulated? She is on tape saying they should have manipulated the Palestinian elections to make sure the right guy won.

When we extradite our own government officials to the countries that they illegally manipulated their elections I will start caring about what Russia did. Fact is Russia has tries to influence our elections for the past 75 years. We do it all over the world. None of you would care if Putin did the same things to help Hillary.
Click to expand...

you were probably busy and didn't see this:

Under federal law and Federal Election Commission regulations, both foreign nationals and foreign governments are prohibited from making contributions or spending money to influence a federal, state or local election in the United States. The ban includes independent expenditures made in connection with an election.

Those banned from such spending include foreign citizens, foreign governments, foreign political parties, foreign corporations, foreign associations and foreign partnerships, according to the FEC. (Permanent residents who hold green cards, however, are not considered foreign nationals.) Violators face civil penalties, as well as criminal prosecution if they are found to have knowingly broken the law.

////

part b)
Yes Russia has tried but succeeded this time. The question is, did they have American citizens collude to advance their cause.
As far as Americans doing same ---- to quote many (R), "that is troubling"

Putn would not have helped HRC --- so your hypothetical is irrelevant from git -go.
The reasons for choosing Trump over HRC are documented and you can look them up
 
goldfly said:
i love the "i'll overlook this cause something that has absolutely no relevance at all to it is happening too" stitch

that the so called freedom lover plays every single time
Click to expand...

It's moreso that I don't care about it.

And I'm trying to understand why you do so much... so I want to compare it to something I do care about, to which you seemingly don't.

Make sense?
 
DJHrGJIW4AAR7XA.jpg:large
 
I know, it's obviously nothing

Cause they just keep lying about it

But we now know that the adoption story the president said the meeting was about was a lie/cover up

[tw]905820512395427840[/tw]
 
goldfly said:
I know, it's obviously nothing

Cause they just keep lying about it

But we now know that the adoption story the president said the meeting was about was a lie/cover up

[tw]905820512395427840[/tw]
Click to expand...

WHOA! THIS IS HUGE. THANKS FOR SHARING. LET THE IMPEACHMENT COUNTDOWN BEGIN
 
57Brave said:
you were probably busy and didn't see this:

Under federal law and Federal Election Commission regulations, both foreign nationals and foreign governments are prohibited from making contributions or spending money to influence a federal, state or local election in the United States. The ban includes independent expenditures made in connection with an election.

Those banned from such spending include foreign citizens, foreign governments, foreign political parties, foreign corporations, foreign associations and foreign partnerships, according to the FEC. (Permanent residents who hold green cards, however, are not considered foreign nationals.) Violators face civil penalties, as well as criminal prosecution if they are found to have knowingly broken the law.

////

part b)
Yes Russia has tried but succeeded this time. The question is, did they have American citizens collude to advance their cause.
As far as Americans doing same ---- to quote many (R), "that is troubling"

Putn would not have helped HRC --- so your hypothetical is irrelevant from git -go.
The reasons for choosing Trump over HRC are documented and you can look them up
Click to expand...

They changed the election results with 100k worth of Facebook ads? Thats impressive. I highly doubt Putin thought Trump could win. What Putin was doing was designed to weaken Hillary when she became President.
 
Richard W. Painter‏ @RWPUSA Sep 7

Go to a Russian lawyer for a "fitness" assessment of an opponent? That's the best euphemism yet for "collaboration"
 
So how many meetings with Russians are we up to now? And can someone tell me what the point of requiring they be disclosed if they won't be charged once it's discovered they lied?
 
Let's take a look at the mounting trove of evidence:

* Direct emails to Trump campaign from Russia

* Recorded phone conversations between Russians and Russians and between Russians and the Trump campaign

* Millions of dollars of Trump dept and a decades long history of Trump laundering Russian mob money

* The alleged pee tape

* The hacking of multiple sites, including the DNC, to sway Trump the election

* A tsunami of FAKE NEWS from Russia via Facebook and Twitter. (Explains Trump's obsession with the term "fake news". "Always accuse your enemy of what you are guilty of." Book of Evil, Ch. 1)

* Putin's obsession to have Russian sanctions and the Magnitsky Act ended.

* This Machiavellian plot, almost too absurd to be believed, is right in line with Trump's insane, Narcissistic personality.

* Trump's own words; Jr's own words, ETC.

Seems like more than nothing.
 
Ryan Adams‏ @filmystic

Sen. Mark Warner: "Hard to believe #Facebook only closed 470 fake Russian troll accounts in the U.S. — but closed 50,000 of them in France."
 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-co...918?mg=prod/accounts-wsj&mg=prod/accounts-wsj



WASHINGTON—A U.S. congressman contacted the White House this week trying to broker a deal that would end WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s U.S. legal troubles in exchange for what he described as evidence that Russia wasn’t the source of hacked emails published by the antisecrecy website during the 2016 presidential campaign.

The proposal made by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.), in a phone call Wednesday with White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, was apparently aimed at resolving the probe of WikiLeaks prompted by Mr. Assange’s publication of secret U.S. government documents in 2010 through a pardon or other act of clemency from President Donald Trump.

The possible “deal”—a term used by Mr. Rohrabacher during the Wednesday phone call—would involve a pardon of Mr. Assange or “something like that,” Mr. Rohrabacher said. In exchange, Mr. Assange would probably present a computer drive or other data-storage device that Mr. Rohrabacher said would exonerate Russia in the long-running controversy about who was the source of hacked and stolen material aimed at embarrassing the Democratic Party during the 2016 election.
 
Isn't Rohrabacher the guy even his colleagues make fun of for being an agent of the Kremlin with how Pro-Russia he is in everything?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top