Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Julio3000 said:
So an adversarial foreign power makes a multi-faceted incursion into a presidential election, including a several-pronged approach to one campaign. Several principals of this campaign are in touch with, and subsequently lie about, their contact with said adversarial foreign power. Why, again, is this not worthy of thorough investigation?
Click to expand...

RE: The instinct to mislead.

"I didn't do it because there was so much hysteria and because I didn't know what Ken Starr was going to do to anybody. I thought the American people almost always get it right, if they're given enough time and enough information. There was just this madness. Everybody was saying 'Clinton's dead meat.'"

Many people told him that telling the truth would have cost him the White House, Clinton says.

"I will never know what would have happened, but I can only tell you this," Clinton said. "I have not talked to a single person who was there then, who knew what was going on, who believes that I would survive as president if I had said that. Not one. Not any one."
 
Krgrecw said:
No one cares. If someone on trumps team unmasked a person a day the country would be in an uproar
Click to expand...

It's the classic 'look over here' move that's being eexcited by the left. To think, the abuse of civil rights that was being peretrated by Obama team and the left who used to be privacys biggest defender now perfectly willing to abandon their own beliefs just to chortle the 'Gods' balls. Disgraceful.
 
thethe said:
It's the classic 'look over here' move that's being eexcited by the left. To think, the abuse of civil rights that was being peretrated by Obama team and the left who used to be privacys biggest defender now perfectly willing to abandon their own beliefs just to chortle the 'Gods' balls. Disgraceful.
Click to expand...

the irony of your post isn't lost on me
 
you want me to act like you care about corruption while your boy is using the office for personal gain?

that is me overlooking what silly things you think was corruption i'm sure

but your cries fall on deaf ears after seeing your actions of present
 
goldfly said:
you want me to act like you care about corruption while your boy is using the office for personal gain?

that is me overlooking what silly things you think was corruption i'm sure

but your cries fall on deaf ears after seeing your actions of present
Click to expand...

Can you please share what Trump has personally profited from? I'd love to hear some numbers.

Either way, I am not a fanboy for Trump as the left is for Obama. I've critcized Trump on several occasions already in the first year of his presidency.

However, the Obama administration basically **** all over the 4th amendment as well as completely disregarded the privacy foundations that our country was built on. He weaponize the executive branch to spy on on opposing parties presidential nomination in order to increase their own power to take over our great nation. I understand you don't care because he is the God but what happened under the Obama presidency was unprecedented and is the precursor to many tyrannical regimes.
 
Hawk said:
RE: The instinct to mislead.

"I didn't do it because there was so much hysteria and because I didn't know what Ken Starr was going to do to anybody. I thought the American people almost always get it right, if they're given enough time and enough information. There was just this madness. Everybody was saying 'Clinton's dead meat.'"

Many people told him that telling the truth would have cost him the White House, Clinton says.

"I will never know what would have happened, but I can only tell you this," Clinton said. "I have not talked to a single person who was there then, who knew what was going on, who believes that I would survive as president if I had said that. Not one. Not any one."
Click to expand...

That's a compelling point. And it contributed to seven years of looking under every mossy stone from Little Rock to the White House.

My point of view is, and has always been, that there is enough smoke and suspicious behavior here to warrant an investigation. So if, say, Jared Kushner avoids disclosing meetings with foreign nationals that he is obligated by law to disclose, why shouldn't it be subject to scrutiny? Perhaps it goes nowhere. Why not shine some light on it? Unless your point of you is that the Clintons deserved a political colonoscopy for an Arkansas land deal but the Trump family should be immune to scrutiny for a bit of "oppo" and "due diligence" with an adversarial foreign power.
 
Russian sponsered Jill Stein Facebook campaign ads. She was unaware

Russian sponsered Facebook ads for Sen Sanders write in campaign during general election. He too was unaware

Russian sponsered Facebook campaign for Texas secession.
 
E-mail exchange between Depodesta and COO of facebook saying that he looks forward to working with her to elect the first woman president of the US. Sandberg replies 'I am thrilled at the progress Hillary is making'.

Please, tell me about the Russia collusion....
 
I suspect this will also be ignored.

How many more times must we find evidence of collusion between Democrats and major institutions before it becomes a thing? All of this is 'ok'?
 
57Brave said:
Russian sponsered Jill Stein Facebook campaign ads. She was unaware

Russian sponsered Facebook ads for Sen Sanders write in campaign during general election. He too was unaware

Russian sponsered Facebook campaign for Texas secession.
Click to expand...

but...but...but...what about Vince Foster
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top