No, you're singing a different tune about the import of the Strzok texts.
I think it's funny that one of the texts that you're waving around now is the dude saying he doesn't want to be part of the SC investigation. I get that it is potentially a statement about the quality of the case that was there, and that's a worthwhile point, but it completely undermines your fundamental idea that there is a cabal of FBI baddies champing at the bit to take Trump down.
FWIW, it's easy to understand not being jazzed about being on the investigation if you were a careerist. Way too much downside, especially if you didn't think the case was strong enough.
And you once again blew past the point of the Mills/Abedin thing. There is no such evidence.
Mills/Abedin made factually inaccurate statements in the FBI. Do you need to be reminded of those?
When I spoke of the texts it was to show a deep bias against Trump and clear favortsm towards HRC. This fevered rage to 'get' Trump was pervasive throughout the top levels of the FBI and Obamas DOJ. That is why unmaskings spiked exponentially at the end of Obamas term before the inauguration. They wanted to find something wrong but really more nefariously they needed to find something wrong.
The bias was clearly on the team when you denied its obvious genesis of campaign donations. You are trying to wordsmith your way out of this. There was no collusion. There never was. You ate it up happily and now you have egg on your face.