Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Yeah ... you’ve got to make a better case than an isolated 233% jump in hashtag activity over a 48 hour period to assert that “Russian operatives” are working to “boost” Trump. That kind of blatant action would support your ‘sow discord’ theory, or a theory that Wikileaks traffics in the grey web to get viral traction.
I've honestly made my peace with Donald Trump not going down in flames over this from the beginning. My hope is that enough of his associates go down and are removed from the federal government, and that it gets close enough to Trump so as to help reduce his influence via the 2018 and 2020 elections.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
don't completely agree but this is an excellent article
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
The Russian lawyer in the Trump Tower meeting has been named in a Swiss court case involving allegations of bribery, violating secrecy laws and "unauthorized clandestine behavior."
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Buried in an NBC report is Trump considering possibility of asking Sessions to prosecute Mueller.
Nothing to see.
Nothing to see.
Second Dossier announced.
This one also mentions Trump being compromised at Russian Hotel. Pee Tape.
This one also mentions Trump being compromised at Russian Hotel. Pee Tape.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
witch hunting is a crime
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Something something Comey
57Brave
Well-known member
Fresno Bee:
Nunes of Tulare is sheltered in a relatively safe Republican district, and may believe he will pay no political price for unfairly attacking law enforcement and protecting Trump. But his performance as chairman of the highly sensitive House Intelligence Committee has been nothing short of embarrassing.
Read more here: https://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/editorials/article196633904.html#storylink=cpy
Nunes of Tulare is sheltered in a relatively safe Republican district, and may believe he will pay no political price for unfairly attacking law enforcement and protecting Trump. But his performance as chairman of the highly sensitive House Intelligence Committee has been nothing short of embarrassing.
Read more here: https://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/editorials/article196633904.html#storylink=cpy
'Considering possibly of asking'
Who makes up this language and what type of source would have the knowledge to make this claim?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2018/01/30/report-fbi-officials-find-no-inaccuracies-in-controversial-gop-memo-n2441862
Some seem to believe that there is nothing factually inaccurate about the GOP memo.
Some seem to believe that there is nothing factually inaccurate about the GOP memo.
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
And many others believe there are factual inaccuracies.
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Citing the Washington Post's latest story
Adam Serwer
Adam Serwer
bravesnumberone
Well-known member
Seth Abramson
The Inspector General's report could be the turning of the tide Trump critics have waited for, as it should show what I've long said—there's proof (audio, video, tweets, emails) Flynn, Bannon, Prince, Giuliani and Don Jr. plotted to coerce Comey into re-opening Clinton's case.
I recommend that you read any attempt to paint McCabe as the villain here, and agents in New York as conscientious, as a preemptive strike against what the IG is likely to have found—which is the opposite. Comey was convinced the problem was not McCabe but the New York office.
Likewise, any claim the FBI sat on these emails to aid Clinton has it hilariously backward—throughout October, FBI agents in the NYC office (and NYPD) were leaking to Giuliani and Prince so they could *weaponize* these emails under the pretext they were new and incriminating.
The Inspector General's report could be the turning of the tide Trump critics have waited for, as it should show what I've long said—there's proof (audio, video, tweets, emails) Flynn, Bannon, Prince, Giuliani and Don Jr. plotted to coerce Comey into re-opening Clinton's case.
I recommend that you read any attempt to paint McCabe as the villain here, and agents in New York as conscientious, as a preemptive strike against what the IG is likely to have found—which is the opposite. Comey was convinced the problem was not McCabe but the New York office.
Likewise, any claim the FBI sat on these emails to aid Clinton has it hilariously backward—throughout October, FBI agents in the NYC office (and NYPD) were leaking to Giuliani and Prince so they could *weaponize* these emails under the pretext they were new and incriminating.