bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
Ozzie’s fault. He blocked the best view. We should bench him. But seriously. It is over. We need to move on.
Ozzie’s fault. He blocked the best view. We should bench him. But seriously. It is over. We need to move on.
Seems like folks agitate against the way closers are used and then the first time they blow up want to put the next guy they perceive as the best pitcher right back in the same role.
I can live with Viz closing so long as he is mostly effective. Winkler may be more valuable matching up when he's needed and putting out fires than he would be starting clean innings with leads.
Even my wife who has a basic understanding of safe and out saw it as safe. Just absurd that 'professionals' didn't see this.
Agree. Plus one more front end starter.To be a serious WS contender we’ll have to acquire a legit closer bc we don’t have one on the roster imo.
Agree. Plus one more front end starter.
Not listen to anything you have to say.And what would you suggest the Braves would have to pay to acquire a "front end starter"?
Why are people complaining about Viz? I mean he's not Kimbrel, but he's hardly a bum.
If you have a chance to add Kimbrel for pretty cheap, you do it. but I don't think Boston will be sellers and I don't think he'd be cheap. I'd much rather just ride Viz.
Some people are saying he was tagged on the helmet before the shoulder and that's what made him out. They say his helmet seemed to flap down when Montgomery's glove went by it and that proves he tagged his helmet. I thought the helmet went down because he did the belly flopped slide.
Some people are saying he was tagged on the helmet before the shoulder and that's what made him out. They say his helmet seemed to flap down when Montgomery's glove went by it and that proves he tagged his helmet. I thought the helmet went down because he did the belly flopped slide.
Not listen to anything you have to say.
Been around since Shanks’ board, but thanks!Random guy thinks Braves should acquire TOR SP, then offers no suggestions on how to make it happen. Thanks!
I kept focusing on the pitcher's glove to see if it deformed on the tag. I couldn't really tell, but a helmet tag is the only thing that makes the out call even remotely
plausible.
But then you have the issue of there not being overwhelming evidence. Any way you look at it, it was a terrible call.
I’d like to hear an explanation by the league office.
Been around since Shanks’ board, but thanks!
Anyone else asks, sure I’d give an explanation. You? Waste of time.
Overwhelming evidence is required to overturn a call, not uphold it.
If we can't tell for sure he didn't tag the helmet, there is no overwhelming evidence that he didn't. There is no angle that shows the glove clearly missing the helmet with air between them. Therefore, play stands.