Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

sturg33 said:
I legitimately feel sad for people who think tonight's news is bad for Trump

Yall are embarrassing yourselves even further which is nearly unimaginable that that is possible
Click to expand...


It's not like the phrase "this does not exonerate the President from having committed a crime." appears in the report or anything. But I guess not all investigations can live up the high standards like the Bengahzi investigation which was done purely out of patriotism and in no way was to undermine who they thought might be the next president.
 
cajunrevenge said:
It's not like the phrase "this does not exonerate the President from having committed a crime." appears in the report or anything. But I guess not all investigations can live up the high standards like the Bengahzi investigation which was done purely out of patriotism and in no way was to undermine who they thought might be the next president.
Click to expand...

He was exonerated on conspiracy/coordination which was what this whole thing was about.
 
And he was not exonerated on obstruction charges. If Republicans want to make it not a crime to obstruct investigations as long as you aren't guilty of the crime they are investigating I am all for it.
 
Mimi Rocah
‏Verified account @Mimirocah1
15h15 hours ago

Martha Stewart must be quite confused right now

as she was prosecuted and went to prison for lying

during investigation of an underlying crime that

was not established.
 
cajunrevenge said:
And he was not exonerated on obstruction charges. If Republicans want to make it not a crime to obstruct investigations as long as you aren't guilty of the crime they are investigating I am all for it.
Click to expand...

The obsession here is weird.

1. Mueller specifically said there was no evidence for obstruction.

2. The massive conspiracy and what the entire clownshow was all about was collusion, to which Mueller completely exonerated him for

I get it that the left has no choice but to pivot and cling to this desperately, but any logic or common sense should show that the whole accusations were complete bs and the idiots in this country who fell for it should be embrarrassed.

This is worse than birther, worse than 9/11, etc.


Really wish nsacpi would re post his list for us to review
 
sturg33 said:
The obsession here is weird.

1. Mueller specifically said there was no evidence for obstruction.

2. The massive conspiracy and what the entire clownshow was all about was collusion, to which Mueller completely exonerated him for

I get it that the left has no choice but to pivot and cling to this desperately, but any logic or common sense should show that the whole accusations were complete bs and the idiots in this country who fell for it should be embrarrassed.

This is worse than birther, worse than 9/11, etc.


Really wish nsacpi would re post his list for us to review
Click to expand...

You don't know what Mueller specifically said unless you've read the report.
 
Runnin said:
You don't know what Mueller specifically said unless you've read the report.
Click to expand...

Goodness....

Keep the hope alive! At least the New York Times is moving on

[TW]1110123997805666304[/TW]

Yall could save a little face here by admitting you were lied to a fell for a massive conspiracy with no evidence over nothing but partisanship. You could say you want to hold our media more accountable moving forward.

But nah, we must wait for the full report bc obviously there must be a missing bombshell in there that required 0 indictments!
 
TMW2019-03-27color.png
 
cajunrevenge said:
And he was not exonerated on obstruction charges. If Republicans want to make it not a crime to obstruct investigations as long as you aren't guilty of the crime they are investigating I am all for it.
Click to expand...

Well, that’s a great relief, you know, because he hasn’t been ****ing charged with any.
 
If it’s kosher with the victory lap police, I’m going to continue the same route I’ve been running since November 2016.

Morons.
 
He can't indict a sitting president and he left it up to Congress. AG Barr was selected because he had an extremely favorable position that a President can't obstruct justice. Impeachment isn't going to happen unless a bunch of Republicans want it because it takes 60 votes in the Senate to convict.



When he leaves office he most definitely will face charges and they won't even bother pursuing obstruction charges. He has been a con man his whole life and becoming President was his biggest mistake
 
cajunrevenge said:
He can't indict a sitting president and he left it up to Congress. AG Barr was selected because he had an extremely favorable position that a President can't obstruct justice. Impeachment isn't going to happen unless a bunch of Republicans want it because it takes 60 votes in the Senate to convict.



When he leaves office he most definitely will face charges and they won't even bother pursuing obstruction charges. He has been a con man his whole life and becoming President was his biggest mistake
Click to expand...


Lol
 
You can indict anyone who actually commits a crime.

Now, the **** you fantasize about acts as a great example of an instance where no indictments are going to materialize.
 
A crack analysis by one of our resident McCarthyists a few pages ago claimed that the next “THIS IS BIG” moment was going to involve Roger Stone’s testimony.
 
The butt hurt by the Left is comical.

The bragging of Right is kind of, well, not as much, since they are brains in this part of the forum.

Please check Runnin and 57, they might come down with symptoms, like aneurysm.

I said at the very beginning, this is one fight you don't want to do, we lost, we deal with it and I know it is to an oaf, buffoon, or other names I called the orange one. It happens, deal with it and move on and make sure he is four years and not another.

But the way you are doing this is not guaranteeing you the next president, it is helping him.

Stop.

I want him gone but the right way, not some vengeful way you are thinking. It emboldens the Right when you do this.
 
Also The NY Times: “In The New York Times Opinion Section: Neal K. Katyal, who drafted the special counsel regulations under which Robert Mueller was appointed, writes, "The special counsel regulations were written to provide the public with confidence that justice was done. It is impossible for the public to reach that determination without knowing two things. First, what did the Mueller report conclude, and what was the evidence on obstruction of justice? And second, how could Mr. Barr have reached his conclusion so quickly?"”


I just want the thing released in full
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top