Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

AerchAngel said:
If said Law Enforcement, would got a thanks

Rule of the law? The Dems are just are bad or even worse and hide it. Hypocrites.
Click to expand...

Nobody is more hypocritical than the right. All they do is preach values and adherence to a very strict idea of right and wrong. Yet they support a man who has skirted the law for years, lies everyday, and wouldn't know decency if it bit him in the backside. But the worse part for me is this, if Trump had a "d" behind his name the same defend him or else crowd would be calling for his hide.
 
VirginiaBrave said:
Nobody is more hypocritical than the right. All they do is preach values and adherence to a very strict idea of right and wrong. Yet they support a man who has skirted the law for years, lies everyday, and wouldn't know decency if it bit him in the backside. But the worse part for me is this, if Trump had a "d" behind his name the same defend him or else crowd would be calling for his hide.
Click to expand...



And if Trump had a D beside his name; the liberals of the board would stick up for him and make every excuse for him
 
Hawk said:
You can indict anyone who actually commits a crime.

Now, the **** you fantasize about acts as a great example of an instance where no indictments are going to materialize.
Click to expand...

Whoa there buddy. There's been a long standing policy of the Justice Department (by my quick research since 1973) not to indict or convict a sitting president.

Also, Manafort indicted 34 people, a lot of them with ties to Trump.

Stone - Campaign Advisor
Cohen - Personal Lawyer
Manafort - Campaign Chair
Papadopoulous - Campaign Aide.
Flynn - Former National Security Advisor
Gates - Campaign Aide
and plenty more.

Just because Trump or his family wasn't indicted doesn't mean he was innocent. As Trump wouldn't be indicted and I don't think Mueller would risk the political backlash of indicting his family. Barr won't release the report because I bet Congress will press him to indict either Junior or Kushner.
 
Most of those were process crimes. You and the rest of the leftist army can continue to scream, "LOOK AT THE INDICTMENTS" but those have nothing to do with collusion/conspiracy and if not for an illegal investigation started by the Obama administration nobody would be in jail.

It was a fraud and you all fell for it.
 
Krgrecw said:
And if Trump had a D beside his name; the liberals of the board would stick up for him and make every excuse for him
Click to expand...
If Trump had a D beside his name he would be out to pasture like John Edwards and Al Franken. He never would've made it past the Access Hollywood tape.
 
thethe said:
Most of those were process crimes. You and the rest of the leftist army can continue to scream, "LOOK AT THE INDICTMENTS" but those have nothing to do with collusion/conspiracy and if not for an illegal investigation started by the Obama administration nobody would be in jail.

It was a fraud and you all fell for it.
Click to expand...

How is it illegal?
 
If the report really did fully exonerate the President, William Barr and Mitch McConnell would release it in a heartbeat. Clearly there are some things in the report they'd rather not have to defend. So, the lies continue.
 
Runnin said:
If the report really did fully exonerate the President, William Barr and Mitch McConnell would release it in a heartbeat. Clearly there are some things in the report they'd rather not have to defend. So, the lies continue.
Click to expand...

So you think the Mueller would allow Barr to mischaracterize something he spent almost 2 years working on?

Come on now...
 
thethe said:
The investigation started in 2016 with defrauding the FISA courts. End of discussion.
Click to expand...

What you're referring to I'm assuming is the FBI using the Steele Dossier to continue the FISA warrant to monitor Carter Page. What you're not acknowledging is that Carter Page had a FISA warrant before any of this because of his shady ties to Russia. I don't understand how you're making the leap that you're making.

Also you're quick to dump on the Steele Dossier but how much of it has been proven patently false. Most outright statements of "I never was in such and such place" were later proven wrong either by failure to corroborate or testimony. SO care to explain why it shouldn't be used as a avenue for intelligence gathering?
 
zitothebrave said:
What you're referring to I'm assuming is the FBI using the Steele Dossier to continue the FISA warrant to monitor Carter Page. What you're not acknowledging is that Carter Page had a FISA warrant before any of this because of his shady ties to Russia. I don't understand how you're making the leap that you're making.

Also you're quick to dump on the Steele Dossier but how much of it has been proven patently false. Most outright statements of "I never was in such and such place" were later proven wrong either by failure to corroborate or testimony. SO care to explain why it shouldn't be used as a avenue for intelligence gathering?
Click to expand...

Because there was no factual basis to substantiate the need to spy on an American citizen? They purposely obfuscated the fact that is bought and paid for research by Hillary.


And those 'Shady' ties to Russia is complete bunk which ended up being another weak link that led to absolute zero convictions.

To be so comfortable with this obvious abuse of power is sickening.
 
thethe said:
So you think the Mueller would allow Barr to mischaracterize something he spent almost 2 years working on?

Come on now...
Click to expand...

Mischaracterize is a weird choice of words. I think Mueller took his job seriously. I think he also knows what grounds he had to do the things he could and couldn't do. I think he also wouldn't mind at some point in the future being head of the FBI again.
 
thethe said:
Because there was no factual basis to substantiate the need to spy on an American citizen? They purposely obfuscated the fact that is bought and paid for research by Hillary.


And those 'Shady' ties to Russia is complete bunk which ended up being another weak link that led to absolute zero convictions.

To be so comfortable with this obvious abuse of power is sickening.
Click to expand...

This shows you have no clue to what you're talking about. You just believe whatever is said by Trump and his cronies.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/defau...attachments/2015/01/26/buryakov-complaint.pdf

http://time.com/5132126/carter-page-russia-2013-letter/

"Page now acknowledges that he was “Male-1."
 
thethe said:
To be so comfortable with this obvious abuse of power is sickening.
Click to expand...

I find this irony hysterical as you support the man who declared a national emergency to attempt to get his stupid wall built. Someone who literally pulled his pants down and took a dump on the constitution in what can only be described as a power grab. I fear what the manchild will do if he loses re-election. I feel like he'd declare a state of emergency and hold onto the power like a tyrant as he hasn't shown any signs that he wouldn't take a step that far.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top