The Coronavirus, not the beer

Maybe because Chinese aren't the only people that carried the virus to America.

It is factual we lowered seed infections by stopping travel from china. There population was in more advanced stages because it originated there.

Of course other seed infections traveled here from all.over thenworld but at a lower potential infection rate

This is so easy to understand I'm not sure what's taking you so long.

The main reason the US is not italy right now aside from the aged population is we stopped travel from.china.
 
I meant to edit the post. 100k to 200k. Basically exactly what I said 5 days ago.

Care to comment on that?

For one, your comment mentioned he said we 'could' see 100k deaths. He clearly said we WILL see 100k deaths. Secondly, that quote has zero bearing on what he believes the death rate actually is. 100 million people would have to contract COVID-19 for your .1 percent prediction to be accurate with 100k thousand deaths.
 
For one, your comment mentioned he said we 'could' see 100k deaths. He clearly said we WILL see 100k deaths. Secondly, that quote has zero bearing on what he believes the death rate actually is. 100 million people would have to contract COVID-19 for your .1 percent prediction to be accurate with 100k thousand deaths.

Oh we all have it. It's been here for months.

And like I said...I meant to edit the post. Its consistent with what I've been saying for a while now.
 
It is factual we lowered seed infections by stopping travel from china. There population was in more advanced stages because it originated there.

Of course other seed infections traveled here from all.over thenworld but at a lower potential infection rate

This is so easy to understand I'm not sure what's taking you so long.

The main reason the US is not italy right now aside from the aged population is we stopped travel from.china.

You literally said "We stopped the flow of new seed infections on January 31st." That is a blatant lie. You're pulling pages out of Trump's handbook now, speaking half truths and protraying them as facts.
 
Cuomo reported that rate of hospitalization and ICUs have gone down consistently. And we havent even been fully impacted by social distancing measures yet.
 
You literally said "We stopped the flow of new seed infections on January 31st." That is a blatant lie. You're pulling pages out of Trump's handbook now, speaking half truths and protraying them as facts.

Semantics...whateve. yiu first said that wiuldnt matter.

Yes, we should have stopped all travel but if you cant understand how important it was to stop travel with china I dont know how to get you to there.

Its blatantly obvious how important a move that was.
 
Oh we all have it. It's been here for months.

And like I said...I meant to edit the post. Its consistent with what I've been saying for a while now.

Again, that link isn't indicative of anything you said. Fauci could easily be assuming 10-50 million get infected. In fact, he's probably assuming closer to 10 million, since I've seen nothing he's changed his original stance of about 1 percent.
 
Again, that link isn't indicative of anything you said. Fauci could easily be assuming 10-50 million get infected. In fact, he's probably assuming closer to 10 million, since I've seen nothing he's changed his original stance of about 1 percent.

Based on what we have learned about the virus transmission its highly unlikely that only 10m in the country have it considering it's been here since November at the latest.

Every major population center probably has a 30-40% infection rate.
 
Semantics...whateve. yiu first said that wiuldnt matter.

Yes, we should have stopped all travel but if you cant understand how important it was to stop travel with china I dont know how to get you to there.

Its blatantly obvious how important a move that was.

How is that semantics? What you said was literally not true.
 
How is that semantics? What you said was literally not true.

Stop...the spirit of what I said was true.

We stopped a massive influx of seed infections.

Italy didn't.

How did that work out?

Do you still think stopping travel with China had no impact?
 
Maybe because Chinese aren't the only people that carried the virus to America.

Americans and Chinese meet up all over the world. And sometimes the transmission was indirect. Eg. Chinese to Arab to American. It is not fully understood by most people the extent to which people from China (and I'm not talking about the Chinese diaspora) have significant a significant presence all over the world now. They work in many fields and travel a lot.
 
Americans and Chinese meet up all over the world. And sometimes the transmission was indirect. Eg. Chinese to Arab to American. It is not fully understood by most people the extent to which people from China (and I'm not talking about the Chinese diaspora) have significant populations all over the world now. They work in many fields and travel a lot.

That's why the spread is all over the globe.

The areas with larger commercial trade deals and other interconnections got hit first due to the number of seed infections and when they came.
 
Based on what we have learned about the virus transmission its highly unlikely that only 10m in the country have it considering it's been here since November at the latest.

Every major population center probably has a 30-40% infection rate.

So roughly 3 million people in NYC have it currently? If that were true, according to your "math" we should see death tolls of about 3k in NYC alone.
 
So roughly 3 million people in NYC have it currently? If that were true, according to your "math" we should see death tolls of about 3k in NYC alone.

I actually could see the infection rate being much higher in NYC. If you ever visited during the week and walked around or took a subway in the 5 boroughs then you'll understand.

I expect 10k in NYC and long island to die.
 
[tw]1244320570315018240[/tw]

the tweets of a deeply disturbed man

at the same time chosen one is so bad at presidenting i would rather he spend his time doing stuff like this or playing golf than involving himself in matters of government

this is the sad state of affairs we find ourselves in, where the president not attending to his duties is a relief
 
On a serious note... that tweet is very disturbing.

I'm sure sturg will just say we have TDS and thethe will find a way to say trump is using that tweet to play 4D chess with China.
 
On a serious note... that tweet is very disturbing.

I'm sure sturg will just say we have TDS and thethe will find a way to say trump is using that tweet to play 4D chess with China.

No, but its important to continually highlight how biased the MSM is.

Itll get him more independent and bernie voters
 
Back
Top