The Coronavirus, not the beer

I wonder....when the deaths are less than a flu season what will Schiff's investigation be about?

How it could have been less if they didnt fight the treatment options?
 
[Tw]1247095107888615429[/tw]

Chna just playing games but the TDS fools will parrot this when trump makes the decision to open it all up after this week.
 
There will be good after this virus.

Decoupling with China
Strong borders
End of EU

Great times
 
source.gif
 
Liberal news is so predictable.

We will see endless coverage of 'what went wrong' for something that kills less than the flu.

Jesus...never give these people power.
 
And now joe Scarborough pushing thenabsurd claim that virus deaths are understated when its clearly the opposite
 
Please breathe.

I'm not a proofreader. I don't like typing on a phone.

I'm on a PC now so if you would like to engage in a conversation why the models were so wrong I can help you there.

If you want a hint....Its the date of the original infection into the US.
 
I'm not a proofreader. I don't like typing on a phone.

I'm on a PC now so if you would like to engage in a conversation why the models were so wrong I can help you there.

If you want a hint....Its the date of the original infection into the US.

I have zero interest in "engaging in conversation with you." You do not have discussions in good faith. For example, I clearly said I have no idea when the first infection was, so the idea that I was "wrong" about that is just you being an insane person.

You were wrong. You in your infinite intellect and higher education cant critically think.

It's rather sad.

How bout we play a game. You find me a quote from me in this thread making a prediction that has turned out wrong. If you can do this, I will admit I was wrong to make that prediction. I am wrong all the time, so honestly this should be doable.

If you can't find a quote, however, you agree to make no more than one post in a row in this thread. This means you agree to allowing me to enforce this by figuring out how my admin powers work and deleting offending post vomit. Honestly I think this would be good for you. This stream of consciousness posting you are doing has me worried.

Deal?
 
[tw]1247116093048709120[/tw]

Nobody will be talking about ventilators in a week.

Our experts keep getting it wrong.
 
I have zero interest in "engaging in conversation with you." You do not have discussions in good faith. For example, I clearly said I have no idea when the first infection was, so the idea that I was "wrong" about that is just you being an insane person.



How bout we play a game. You find me a quote from me in this thread making a prediction that has turned out wrong. If you can do this, I will admit I was wrong to make that prediction. I am wrong all the time, so honestly this should be doable.

If you can't find a quote, however, you agree to make no more than one post in a row in this thread. This means you agree to allowing me to enforce this by figuring out how my admin powers work and deleting offending post vomit. Honestly I think this would be good for you. This stream of consciousness posting you are doing has me worried.

Deal?

First off I will never agree to a restriction on my speech. If the moderators on this board want to silence one of the only opposition voices to make it a true echo chamber then so be it. THats easier for you guys than admitting that you have gotten almost everything wrong since Trump took office.

You guys laughed endlessly when 10 days ago I tried to sound the alarm that things looked wrong to me. You coudln't even imagine that after expert after expert was telling you hundreds of thousands would die that I could be right. So, while in your lawyerly ways, you are trying to find a loophole into how you weren't embarssingly stupid throughout this disaster and I'm not falling into it.

You absolutely scoffed at the idea the infection was here when I said. SOmething to the extent of, "They were hiding deaths" was your argument.

But whatever makes you feel happy inside. Just know that yet again I was right about this and you were all wrong. Believe it or not in real life that means very little to me but you guys are such arrogant pricks about everyrhing and you'll never admit when you were wrong. (Still waiting on you Julio).

But whatever, do what you want. Removing me from this forum is the last stake in the ground that you guys don't know what you are talking about
 
Anti-body test development seems rocky.

https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/amp/Article/2020-04-05-trouble-in-testing-land

Sadly, the tests we have looked at to date have not performed well. We see many false negatives (tests where no antibody is detected despite the fact we know it is there) and we also see false positives. None of the tests we have validated would meet the criteria for a good test as agreed with the MHRA. This is not a good result for test suppliers or for us.
 
Back
Top