Still wondering why not a single judge has been impressed by the "evidence" presented in the 50+ cases that have been adjudicated so far.
Any other feedback on this?
Attorneys and election officials were able to examine 1,526 additional ballots on Wednesday. And the results didn’t bode well for Ward’s attempt to show that improperly duplicated ballots may have cost Trump the race in Arizona.
Nine of the 1,626 duplicate ballots examined had errors — seven of which cost Trump votes and two that took votes from Biden. Scott Jarrett, Maricopa County’s director of election day voting, testified on Thursday that if that error rate were applied to the nearly 28,000 total duplicated ballots cast in the county, Trump would gain a mere 103 votes.
Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes.
More Rupar from Goldy.
I'm stunned
https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/03...lot-errors-didnt-affect-presidential-outcome/
Yeah, I’m not convinced.
You know the answer to this already.
Your questions are a big tell on your overall sentiment.
Nsacpi, maybe you’d like to opine on the 11% improper acceptance rate on the Arizona mail in ballot sample?
https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/03...lot-errors-didnt-affect-presidential-outcome/
Yeah, I’m not convinced.
if you could provide a link from a reliable source i'd be happy to read up on it and share my reaction
Still wondering why not a single judge has been impressed by the "evidence" presented in the 50+ cases that have been adjudicated so far.
Haven't you heard? That's irrelevant.
It’s a video clip, so I’m not sure why it matters who tweeted it.
OH goldy assures. Me he has no. Idea who this guy is yet pushes his posts on here multiple times per week.
Rupar is a king of fake news
apparently i know the reason why and am feigning obtuseness