If I get the virus, then I will do my part by not going around coughing on people. I'm a man of the people tulu
Moron, you do realize that first you're contagious before symptoms show. Studies think you're most contagious 24-48 before showing symptoms.
Also you realize that morons like you not getting vaccinated can lead us to not kick this in the rear and the virus to mutate and perhaps those mutations will be able to sneak past vaccine protections.
Of course I know that I'm talking to a literal wall. So it will fall on deaf ears.
So you think herd immunity is the answer?
Welcome to April, 2020.
So you think herd immunity is the answer?
Welcome to April, 2020.
You clearly don't understand how that is achieved.
Your entire argument was based on the assumption that "everyone would get" so why delay the inevitable by sinking the economy.
I literally explained it you then, that purpose of lockdowns and containing the spread was to buy time until a viable treatment option or vaccine could be developed that would drastically reduce the death rate. Now 8 months later as the percentage of those vaccinated with at least 1 dose quickly approaches 20% of the population, it is overwhelmingly clear that your plan would have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans for nothing.
You clearly don't understand how that is achieved.
BTW, your entire argument from April-May 2020 was based on the assumption that "everyone would get it eventually so why delay the inevitable while sinking the economy."
I literally explained it you then, that purpose of lockdowns and containing the spread was to buy time until a viable treatment option or vaccine could be developed that would drastically reduce the death rate. Now 10 months later as the percentage of those vaccinated with at least 1 dose quickly approaches 20% of the population, it is overwhelmingly clear that your plan would have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans for nothing.
The states who locked down the hardest had the worst outcomes.
It is true that states and other jurisdictions that locked down the hardest had the worst outcomes.
A little knowledge about causal inference can go a long way. Here is a tutorial:
https://delphi.cmu.edu/blog/2021/01/19/causal-inference-for-social-mobility-and-covid-19/
cliff notes summary: Estimating causal effects is tricky. We all know that “correlation isn’t causation.” For example, mask usage and cases could both increase over time. But that doesn’t mean that masks cause more cases to occur. Activation of “Buckle your seatbelt” signs on airplanes is correlated with turbulence. But activating the sign does not cause turbulence.
This btw is why "natural experiments" where all but one variables are kept under control are useful for inferring efficacy. Hence my fondness for the North Dakota/South Dakota mask mandate experiment, and the experiment involving 3 similar neighboring Arizona counties, one with a mask mandate and two without.
You can never control all but one variable.
You should understand that clearly.
[Tw]1370379207482642434[/tw]
you're right...none of the examples i cite are dispositive...it's pretty rare in a situation this complicated to find an experiment that can settle a question like this...the only way to do it is to gather an enormous amount of data from many jurisdictions and do a multivariate analysis...both the data gathering and the statistical analysis are heavy lifts
Even if your number of hundreds of thousands which is highly unlikely were true that’s just one side of the ledger.
You guys never seem to understand that basic concept and have tunnel vision because you were instructed to so that the oranage man would lose.