No All Star Game in Atlanta This Season?

"targeting innocents"

that is a stretch to say the least

"innocents" will be collateral damage to any type of protest

How is it a stretch? Moving the All Star game hurts Kemp and the Georgia General Assembly pretty much not at all. It does hurt lots of people who would have made difference making money to them.

So this is either a protest with decisions being made by the dumbest people alive or they're targeting innocent people to try to make their point.

Punishing people who were innocent in this is a sickening tactic. Calling it "collateral damage" is simply lying.
 
I don’t think moving the game was productive and I think it will backfire, but I aldo have nothing but disgust for the law. I wish there was something that would hit its supporters but hitting rural areas is kind of like attacking the Vietcong by bombing the jungle. They’re hard to target. It’s the hicks who need to be made to pay not metro Atlanta business people.
 
I don’t think moving the game was productive and I think it will backfire, but I aldo have nothing but disgust for the law. I wish there was something that would hit its supporters but hitting rural areas is kind of like attacking the Vietcong by bombing the jungle. They’re hard to target. It’s the hicks who need to be made to pay not metro Atlanta business people.

This guy can’t tell us one reason why the law is bad.

Low information voters.
 
I don’t think moving the game was productive and I think it will backfire, but I aldo have nothing but disgust for the law. I wish there was something that would hit its supporters but hitting rural areas is kind of like attacking the Vietcong by bombing the jungle. They’re hard to target. It’s the hicks who need to be made to pay not metro Atlanta business people.

This makes zero sense.

You want to penalize politicians for giving folks more opportunity to vote?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
How is it a stretch? Moving the All Star game hurts Kemp and the Georgia General Assembly pretty much not at all. It does hurt lots of people who would have made difference making money to them.

So this is either a protest with decisions being made by the dumbest people alive or they're targeting innocent people to try to make their point.

Punishing people who were innocent in this is a sickening tactic. Calling it "collateral damage" is simply lying.

Literally every protest ever affects people’s money

It’s the point

You’re also bot stating none of this happens if any of the laws weren’t signed into cause republicans wanted to protect the ego of a loser
 
Literally every protest ever affects people’s money

It’s the point

You’re also bot stating none of this happens if any of the laws weren’t signed into cause republicans wanted to protect the ego of a loser

Let's say your brother is a cop who gave me a ticket that I think I'd bogus. I'm also your boss. I have no power over your cop brother but I do have power over you. I "protest" the ticket by firing you.

You did nothing wrong but get punished for someone else's actions. Are you just collateral damage? Or am I a terrible person for targeting an innocent person in my "protest"?

By your logic you could justify hostage taking as a valid means of protest.
 
Let's say your brother is a cop who gave me a ticket that I think I'd bogus. I'm also your boss. I have no power over your cop brother but I do have power over you. I "protest" the ticket by firing you.

You did nothing wrong but get punished for someone else's actions. Are you just collateral damage? Or am I a terrible person for targeting an innocent person in my "protest"?

By your logic you could justify hostage taking as a valid means of protest.

The worst part is goldy is too stupid to know why the bill doesn't do what his masters told him it does

So the pritest makes no sense in general
 
Let's say your brother is a cop who gave me a ticket that I think I'd bogus. I'm also your boss. I have no power over your cop brother but I do have power over you. I "protest" the ticket by firing you.

You did nothing wrong but get punished for someone else's actions. Are you just collateral damage? Or am I a terrible person for targeting an innocent person in my "protest"?

By your logic you could justify hostage taking as a valid means of protest.

This example is like comparing someone’s office job to athletes

Much less individual actions aren’t a good example of protest for widespread change


The big lie is A

B is changing voting laws for no good reason

C is the market saying they don’t want to be part of it

C never happens without B going a long with A

C is not the problem of it
 
One thing that's incredibly sad in all this is how virtually no legitimate journalism has been done on this story. It's a complete echo chamber of generalities and virtue signaling.

There's no spine in journalism to stand up to the mob.

Dude...HAWK thanked this post! Where the heck has he been?
 
Dude...HAWK thanked this post! Where the heck has he been?

He was tired from early stage owning of the lefty clowns on this forum. He leveled up and can no longer gain experience on these forums.
 
This example is like comparing someone’s office job to athletes

Much less individual actions aren’t a good example of protest for widespread change


The big lie is A

B is changing voting laws for no good reason

C is the market saying they don’t want to be part of it

C never happens without B going a long with A

C is not the problem of it

The laws were never changed constitutionally so everything they changed in 2020 was irrelevant.
 
Are you chief justice thethe now? We have a court system. Trump sued BEFORE the election and lost. The courts are how we determine constitutionality. Theres plenty of **** I dont agree with the way the court ruled. Suing after the election for **** you already lost on BEFORE the election is going to get thrown out every single time. Any allegations of fraud have to be backed up by evidence. Just saying "well 10 thousand dead people voted so I want 10k votes taken away from my opponet" isnt evidence. Even if you could prove that many dead people voted they would have to individually go through and see who they voted for. What your boy was doing was making claims and asking for discovery so they could go to find something. That's now how this works. That's not how anything works.
 
Last edited:
Texas governor decides to announce he voluntarily wants to **** over possible small business people to “own the libs” if given the chance
 
The Coke boycott lasted all of never

Just playing to the stupid cult

[tw] 1379170568562434050[/tw]
 
Man, if republicans are true to their word on boycotts

They aren’t gonna be getting on any plane soon

[tw]1379090217521590279[/tw]
 
Man, if republicans are true to their word on boycotts

They aren’t gonna be getting on any plane soon

[tw]1379090217521590279[/tw]

It's sad so many people can't see these things for what these are, corporate virtue signaling that doesn't greatly impact finances.

Calling out China for genocide would cost these companies a lot of money. Can't have that. So instead they have to pander to the left with meaningless statements on wildly distorted issues. The left should be horrified but instead they revel in it.

It would be funny if it wasn't having real world impacts.
 
It would be funny if it wasn't having real world impacts.

Hopefully Texas and other states are watching. Those who would pander to the BIG LIE have been duly warned. And no I don't mind virtue signaling one bit when it comes to participatory democracy. There are many things state legislators can do that I disagree with and wouldn't support a boycott over. Voting rights aint one of those.
 
Back
Top