To put some truth here, Colorado does not have more restrictive voting laws than Georgia. They have fewer early voting days but that's largely because they're unnecessary. Colorado mails ballots to every registered voter without the need to request them. Colorado has a much larger percentage of people vote by mail and so doesn't have the need for as much in person voting. Colorado also has automatic voter registration which is one of the few voting laws that actually increases participation. I'll guarantee this system is why lily white Denver was chosen.
The issue is the belief that Georgia's new law is somehow out of line with the rest of the country in term of voter suppression. It's not.
The requirement to put an ID number on absentee ballots is required in, I think, 4 other states and a whole list of states (including Colorado) verify signatures on absentee ballots. Signature verification has its own list of problems as it results in a large number of ballots being excluded. These ballots are almost all valid, they're just the result of people have inconsistent signatures or a signature that has changed. So each system of verification has its own issues and it's not clear if one is superior.
Georgia's requires 17 early voting days and allows 2 more if counties wish to use them (most will) so you're really looking at 19 days. The national average is 19. New York now famously has 9.
Georgia law didn't allow for ballot drop boxes before Covid but they were allowed under emergency rules so people could vote while socially distanced. The new law actually made the drop boxes permanent (though reduced their number). Had this law not been passed the drop boxes would have disappeared when the emergency rules ended.
As for food and water in line, many states (including Colorado and New York) have placing restrictions on this practice. The type of restrictions vary, for example New York allows food and drink with a retail value under $1 to be passed out without identifying the source. Georgia's law allows for unattended, self-serve water stations to be set up. Ultimately these laws have virtually no impact on voting.
The other provisions of the bill (changing the head of the state elections committee, allowing the state to fire local officials, etc) are administrative and do not directly impact people's ability to vote. Since MLB's decision was based on the idea the law suppresses people's right to vote in some extraordinary way, I wont break these down.
So it's quite clear that Georgia's law does not put up unique, extraordinary obstacles to voting. While the truth is the Colorado's voting laws are less restrictive, the characterization of Georgia's law has been incredibly misleading.