Race

Yes, but that doesn't answer my question. Why was he having trouble breathing before the altercation and why didn't the doctor mention that?

I guess no one thought it was relevant. When did he say I can't breathe. I remember him saying he was claustrophobic when they were trying to get him in the car. I don't remember him saying I cant breathe until he was on the ground. Maybe covid killed him. His defense attorney is suggesting all sorts of possibilities. Why not covid. A lot of people have suffered damage to their lungs from covid.
 
Last edited:
I guess no one thought it was relevant. When did he say I can't breathe. I remember him saying he was claustrophobic when they were trying to get him in the car.

How in the world is that not relevant? Yes, it's in one of the videos.
 
"Floyd tells the officers several times that he cannot breathe and says he wants to lay on the ground. Prior to getting Floyd to the ground, he says he cannot breathe multiple times."
 
Except the autopsy said it. I've posted it twice in the last 2 days, not doing it again, do the minimum amount of research please.

According to an article I read the first(preliminary) autopsy had all his internal organs intact and the vessels in his body were not already cut up. That one says no asphyxiation. Further autopsies were done with a more mutilated body. Which one do I believe especially with public opinion in the case? Doing a 180 on this is suspicious as hell. I'm willing to believe the first.
 
This was from the preliminary autopsy. Read this and explain to me how all of this changed in subsequent autopsies?

Eyd41gTW8AMXLH8
 
This was from the preliminary autopsy. Read this and explain to me how all of this changed in subsequent autopsies?

Eyd41gTW8AMXLH8

You may as well give it up. They’re just going to argue whatever point fits thier narrative and they’ll never concede that they are/were wrong.
 
Last edited:
It’s weird how some of the same people that think the deep state controls everything


Totally just believe the whole justice system when they make a report lol
 
This was from the preliminary autopsy. Read this and explain to me how all of this changed in subsequent autopsies?

Eyd41gTW8AMXLH8

Here, since you won't do even the tiniest amount of research and are just trying to prove your point.

What that is talking about is he didn't have a broken neck, he wasn't beaten within an inch of his life, etc. You ignored the first part which mentions

https://www.fox9.com/news/hennepin-county-medical-examiner-declares-george-floyd-death-homicide

The updated report states that on May 25, George Floyd experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by law enforcement officer(s).
 
Here, since you won't do even the tiniest amount of research and are just trying to prove your point.

What that is talking about is he didn't have a broken neck, he wasn't beaten within an inch of his life, etc. You ignored the first part which mentions

https://www.fox9.com/news/hennepin-county-medical-examiner-declares-george-floyd-death-homicide

The updated report states that on May 25, George Floyd experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by law enforcement officer(s).

If you did any research you would know the county did two different autopsies done with two different results. The first(preliminary) one was the one above that was posted where there was nothing found wrong. The first one makes it clear there was no occult injury to the neck, shoulders, etc.. That is in black and white. Read it.

There was an additional autopsy (Updated report) done by the county where everything was changed and now ruled a homicide.

How does an autopsy go from showing absolutely no physical trauma on the body on the preliminary to homicide on the follow up? If he was given enough pressure on his neck for him to go into cardiopulmonary pressure there would be noticeable trauma to the neck and back. It's never mentioned in the preliminary.
 
Last edited:
The defense will put up their own experts saying Floyd died of a drug overdose. It comes down to who you believe which is probably influenced by what you're predisposed to believe.

I remind everyone that the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. It's not what is most likely true. The prosecution must disprove any reasonable alternatives. That's a tall burden here.
 
Back
Top